Mobilni B92
 
           
   
  Insight | Gallery | Travel | Blog | Music | Marketing
 
 
Politics | Business & Economy | Crime & War crimes | Society | Region | World B92 live TV | Radio
Follow us on
 
           
 
All news
Latest news
Comments
Newsletter

SUBTOPICS
Headlines
Politics
Business & Economy
Crime & War crimes
Society
Region
World

Dictionary and Translation software by Babylon

 
B92 News Comments
Pročitajte vest Former Bosnian army chief to face trial
  4 July 2007

Send your comment

Comments: 7

  1. The British and US were responsible for a lot of the recruitment of mujahedin in Bosnia, but somehow I don't think that they are going to end up in the Hague for rounding up Bin Laden's comrades and sending them to Bosnia to commit war crimes. The 'karma' viewpoint is: look a Iraq and Afghanistan to see the payback for this. Not Britain's or America's buddies any more, are they? Depends on who the mujahedin are killing at some give point in time, I suppose.
    (Stevo, 4 July 2007 15:26)
    Number of recommendations 0
  2. a token punishment of one or two years so that the myth can be perpetuated that the serbs were the aggressors.

    that's geopolitics for you.
    (PB, 4 July 2007 15:36)
    Number of recommendations 0
  3. ITis really Izetbegovic,silajdzic and Ganic who invited these Arabs into Bosnia and whilst Izet is now gone the other two should be in the hague with long prison sentances hanging over them.
    (ray, 4 July 2007 17:47)
    Number of recommendations 0
  4. The guy is going to walk out free or at best get 6 months jail. What a Joke this court is and they have the nerve to demand Mladic! Its no wonder the Serbian government is not so quick to give him up. Bosnians and Albanians better start paying the price for their war crimes if the Hague ever hopes to get Mladic.
    (Canadien, 4 July 2007 21:48)
    Number of recommendations 0
  5. Where are the comments here from the supposed true humanatarians on this site who decry war crimes again and again? The El Mujahid unit is accused of torture, decapitation, rape and murder. Why no mention of the Kamenica Camp and the crimes committed there? Rasim Delic was the adviser to the Bosniak member of Bosnia and Herzegovina's (BiH) tripartite presidency when he was initially indited.
    Your silence is hypocritical and supports my argument that you lack objectivity and your cause for justice is one-sided!
    (Roger7, 4 July 2007 22:52)
    Number of recommendations 0
  6. There were some atrocities committed by foreign fighters on the muslim, croat and serb side (yes Serbs came from Serbia to fight in B&H). This is known.

    However, look at the civilian casulaties. Which side sustained the largest number of civilian casulaties? - the muslims. 83% of civilian deaths according to the new report (Book of the Dead) were muslim. 15% serb and croat combined. Now ask yourselves, which sides had a bunch of criminals as leaders. While Izetbegovic was calling for a unified Bosnian state Karadzic (Milosevic, Mladic, Arkan etc) and Tudman and Boban on the Croat side were ordering execution of civilians to cleanse land for a "Greater Serbia or Croatia". There was systematic rape of women, there was destruction of places of worship. How Christian is that?

    Serbs and Croats need to wake up and see what slaughtering was done in their name. The sad thing is that these intelligent criminals really didn't want the best for their people only to satisfy their own instincts for power.

    And don't keep talking about foreign fighters on the muslim side, there were foreign fighters on every side.
    (Slavko, 5 July 2007 06:36)
    Number of recommendations 0
  7. The Muslims count many fighters as civilians. This has actually been found out through researching the names. I think many have still slipped by the researchers.

    And they are counting "missing" in the latest numbers STILL. Since the Muslims claimed as dead have been found alive - including after trying Serbs for their murder and making them confess under torture - I say the death toll (even though it has been found a lot lower than the Muslims claimed) is even lower.

    Additionally the dead are 89% men. This shows no one was really after the women and children, and that they were in collateral damage numbers less than other wars.

    Additionally, since they are counting "children" as those under 18, this means that 16 and 17-year-olds (the armies recruited at 16 from all sides) would be claimed as children.

    Mostly soldiers died and to kill soldiers generally means an opposing army had to do it. Unarmed civilians can't really kill army members.

    The book of the dead shows most killed were military, and many civilians weren't really civilians if they were genuinely so-called "armed civilians".
    (ida, 5 July 2007 20:34)
    Number of recommendations 0

 
Wednesday, 4 July 2007
Print page Send page


 In focus
Serbian patriarch dies
Kosovo status
Economic crisis in Serbia
Vojvodina statute
Hague cooperation
Euro-Atlantic integration
Swine flu outbreak
Poll

Should Kosovo Serbs take part in the local elections?







Beyond Berlin: Next 20 years
Timophy Garton Ash
"You don't need to have any sentimental attachment to Europe whatsoever to understand that to tackle these problems we need the scale and clout that only Europe gives. This has nothing at all do ...


Appropriate Mourning, November 21, 2009
Chris Farmer

Where does the line get drawn? The passing of Patriarch Pavle, for whom all the respect paid to his memory was and is well deserved, allowed for some rather questionable decisions on the side of the government ...



 
© 1995 - 2009, B92 | Contact | About us | Impressum | Rules of use

 

Write us B92 Wap RSS news service

Radovan Karadzic on Trial: Follow news and in-depth coverage on