1. The court itself was set up by mafiosi, the Clintons.
    (Ataman, 1 December 2017 15:27)

    According to the UN, the court was set up in 1993 after it was proposed by Russia, it was approved by Russia and all judges between 1993 and 2017 were approved by Russia, some more than once.

    You might want to stop your obsession with the Clintons as it is not good for your mental health :)
    (icj1, 2 December 2017 03:02)

    Soooo? You want me to clap and declare unlimited love to Yeltsin and VVP?
    (Ataman, 2 December 2017 18:25)

    That's up to you... Not sure why should I care whether you clap and declare unlimited love to Yeltsin and VVP or not!
    (icj1, 4 December 2017 04:12)

    # Comment link

  2. According to the UN, the court was set up in 1993 after it was proposed by Russia
    (icj1, 2 December 2017 03:02)

    By Yeltsin, indeed. A communist low-life who destroyed his own country our of revenge. A low-life who could not manage a meeting with Milos or Clint without being drunk.
    A low-life who made a successor worse than himself.

    Soooo? You want me to clap and declare unlimited love to Yeltsin and VVP?

    No way.

    BTW: the way how VVP developed - and people do change - it was not only him, but the stupidity of his partners in the West.
    (Ataman, 2 December 2017 18:25)

    # Comment link

  3. The court itself was set up by mafiosi, the Clintons.
    (Ataman, 1 December 2017 15:27)

    According to the UN, the court was set up in 1993 after it was proposed by Russia, it was approved by Russia and all judges between 1993 and 2017 were approved by Russia, some more than once.

    You might want to stop your obsession with the Clintons as it is not good for your mental health :)
    (icj1, 2 December 2017 03:02)

    # Comment link

  4. The court itself was set up by mafiosi, the Clintons.

    Praljak would be released very soon because he already spent over 2/3 of his sentence.

    What Praljak wanted is to demonstrate to everyone, the court has no legitimacy.

    And he had the only choice to do so.

    He could be indeed guilty and realistically if we look at others like Mladic or Milosevic - the last two are plain psychopaths.

    But Clinton is not in position to try some random psycho, no matter how bad is that psycho.

    Personally, I have no problem with even harder sentence... but not by THAT court.

    Personally, I do not like Trump at all. But I am really happy, the old harpy hag did not made it into presidency. May she and her rotten husband stay in hell forever... to bad, there is no hell.

    BTW: economically her or her billy hubby are probably better for us than Trump, but I can't recall, whom I do despise more in politics than Clintons.
    (Ataman, 1 December 2017 15:27)

    # Comment link

  5. I hope he didn't die..... Quickly!
    (Practice, 1 December 2017 02:36)

    # Comment link

  6. So, it was deadly chemical?
    And he took it? He drank it , not inject it, right?
    It was found in a container? Was that a container?

    Please, miss Obvious, form a panel of experts that can hold a press conference later and answer all the questions we already have answers to.
    (Sreten, 30 November 2017 16:20)

    # Comment link