1. Questioner

    about as plausible as believing we came from Siciliy. according to Wikipedia however, most scholars do consider Albanians to have descended from a people of the pre-historic Balkans, so wither Dacians, Thracians or Illyrians. so if you have a problem, take it up with them.
    (Nikolle, 1 July 2013 10:06)

    # Comment link

  2. From what I've read on B92, Bulgar, Albanians come from Sicily, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Arabia...I'm going to believe that we come from South Africa, it seems as plausible as your nonsense theory.
    (Nikolle, 28 June 2013 15:08)

    Yes, many nonsense unproven theories to read here. Some even believe Albanians are descendants of Illyrians! Funny, eh? Though there is not much evidence found to prove for that crude theory.
    (Questioner, 30 June 2013 12:11)

    # Comment link

  3. i have no idea what you're on about Bulgar and I'm sure that you don't know either
    (Nikolle, 30 June 2013 01:14)

    # Comment link

  4. (Nikolle, 28 June 2013 15:08)

    For your reference with my comment before I'm very clear, ( April 1042 city Durer) Albos see Balkan 1-st time. Last building what Geroge Maniaces build was Maniaces Castle (1032-1037)city Siracuse in Sicily.
    Very nise looking castle, even today this is bigest tourist atraction.
    ''it seems not plausible as your nonsense theory for Milos Obilic'',
    but by pass own leader Maniaces with proof for albo bigest monument today in Siracuse.
    Please don't go arround to confuse other reader what I don't indicated,like adding 4-5 place for albos location.
    For your reference visit "SIRACUSE CASTLE" and be positive with your
    comment please.
    (Bugar from Skoplje, 29 June 2013 05:37)

    # Comment link

  5. From what I've read on B92, Bulgar, Albanians come from Sicily, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Arabia...I'm going to believe that we come from South Africa, it seems as plausible as your nonsense theory.
    (Nikolle, 28 June 2013 15:08)

    # Comment link

  6. "commemorating a battle that historians know nothing about. zero evidence for Milos Obilic's existence, zero evidence for the so called defection of Brankovic, but then, a people who have a habit of commemorating defeats don't really need evidence, poetry written 300 years after the event took place is proof enough."
    (Nikolle, 28 June 2013 13:33)
    Here is comparation for negative comment with evidence for longer time:
    Not Commemorating a Ohrid battle in April 1042 yr. that historians know evrithing 100% with evidence for George Maniakes existence, but his own people wanted to destroy all evidence for the so called defection of Sicilian Maniakes, but then, a people who have a habit to not commemorating 1-st visit to the Balkan and don't really count evidence, also poetry is not written for 971 years after the event took place is proof for new Balkan people is not found itself in new area for 1000 yr.
    (Bugar from Skoplje, 28 June 2013 14:41)

    # Comment link

  7. commemorating a battle that historians know nothing about. zero evidence for Milos Obilic's existence, zero evidence for the so called defection of Brankovic, but then, a people who have a habit of commemorating defeats don't really need evidence, poetry written 300 years after the event took place is proof enough.
    (Nikolle, 28 June 2013 13:33)

    # Comment link