Members of Serbian Interior Ministry (MUP) and police special units stood behind Stefanovic as he spoke about a tabloid's allegations about Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic and his subsequent decision to take polygraph test. The presence of masked and armed police provided "an usual backdrop" to a news conference, NGO representatives said a day later.
Thus Sonja Stojanovic-Gajic of the Belgrade Center for Security Policy says the statements made by politicians "point out that they, too, are conducting the police's operative work, instead of leaving it to the professionals" - and that it is "wrong when these professionals are presented in public merely as the decoration for the minister."
The message sent in this way, she said, is that "the minister's safety is endangered, too, and we all should be afraid of something - but does not say what the state is doing to protect citizens."
Dragan Popovic from the Center for Practical Policy thinks the goal of the display was to "intimidate citizens":
"I cannot see any other reason for people with rifles, with masks on their faces to stand behind the police minister in a Serbian government building. Therefore it is completely inappropriate and has never happened before."
Popovic remarked that such scenes have not been seen in Serbia even when during states of emergency in the past, and that the armed police were "clearly not there to provide answers" during the news conference:
"In other words, you can ask them nothing, they look sort of grotesque, in full war gear and with rifles."
What emerged as the main story are the accusations that two Belgrade-based tabloids have been trading for some days. The story about "a suspicious person who observed the PM's apartment and could represent a potential threat" disappeared into the background.
"As for information about the alleged attacker on the prime minister, we received very scarce information, we don't know if this is in some way connected. We don't know anything about that case, I would simply like to hear from the prosecutor or somebody conducting the investigation, not from the police (interior) minister, not from politicians, to tell us all the details of this potentially fairly dangerous scenario," said Popovic.
Stojanovic-Gajic, meanwhile, thinks that both accusations - that the prime minister's security is in danger, and about "potential corruption" - are equally serious and should be seriously investigated - "but by professionals":
"Public should be informed during the investigation about the measures, not the expected outcome, especially not in a phase where, as we are finding out, only one investigative measure, and that is the polygraph (test), has been implemented."
Meanwhile, the police remained silent when asked why the minister's news conference yesterday was attended by numerous uniformed and armed policemen.
The posts on social networks about the same happening in other countries have not provided an adequate answer.
I wouldn't worry to much about what some NGOs have to say...
The NED the national endowment for democracy has just be banned in Russia due to security concerns... its not just the NED which has been banned, but at least ten other NGOs which are being used by countries such as america as foreign policy tools...
When an NGO makes a statement, it is usually in accordance with foreign policy objectives of a particular country. These statements are made by foreigners which try to influence the country which they operate in... these statements hold the interest of people abroad, not necessarily the interests of the target country in which they operate.
We must be cautious and carefully analyze the statements of NGOs as they do not represent the interests of the country or the people where they operate. Some perfectly legitimate police in masks as a backdrop is legal, these people are law enforcement and there is nothing sinister about this as some NGOs would have you believe...
When there is something illegal, maybe some outlaws in the background holding guns, then this may be questioned, but as far as masked police in the background goes, this is perfectly legal and does not constitute any political, social or economic threat...
(Nikola Novakovic, 1 December 2015 05:55)
I wouldn't worry to much about what some NGOs have to say...
The NED the national endowment for democracy has just be banned in Russia due to security concerns... its not just the NED which has been banned, but at least ten other NGOs which are being used by countries such as america as foreign policy tools...
When an NGO makes a statement, it is usually in accordance with foreign policy objectives of a particular country. These statements are made by foreigners which try to influence the country which they operate in... these statements hold the interest of people abroad, not necessarily the interests of the target country in which they operate.
We must be cautious and carefully analyze the statements of NGOs as they do not represent the interests of the country or the people where they operate. Some perfectly legitimate police in masks as a backdrop is legal, these people are law enforcement and there is nothing sinister about this as some NGOs would have you believe...
When there is something illegal, maybe some outlaws in the background holding guns, then this may be questioned, but as far as masked police in the background goes, this is perfectly legal and does not constitute any political, social or economic threat...
(Nikola Novakovic, 1 December 2015 05:55)
I wouldn't worry to much about what some NGOs have to say...
The NED the national endowment for democracy has just be banned in Russia due to security concerns... its not just the NED which has been banned, but at least ten other NGOs which are being used by countries such as america as foreign policy tools...
When an NGO makes a statement, it is usually in accordance with foreign policy objectives of a particular country. These statements are made by foreigners which try to influence the country which they operate in... these statements hold the interest of people abroad, not necessarily the interests of the target country in which they operate.
We must be cautious and carefully analyze the statements of NGOs as they do not represent the interests of the country or the people where they operate. Some perfectly legitimate police in masks as a backdrop is legal, these people are law enforcement and there is nothing sinister about this as some NGOs would have you believe...
When there is something illegal, maybe some outlaws in the background holding guns, then this may be questioned, but as far as masked police in the background goes, this is perfectly legal and does not constitute any political, social or economic threat...
(Nikola Novakovic, 1 December 2015 05:55)