"Ensure peace and sustainable solutions"

Providing supplies to KFOR and freedom of movement for the international mission constitute an obligation on the basis of the Military Technical Agreement in Kumanovo which Serbia adopted and the UN SC Resolution 1244.
-Tadic

Yes, and under the resolution the international mission must be status neutral. They are not doing so by transporting the "Kosova" customs officers to the checkpoints. Therefore, we don't need to give them freedom of movement if that continues.

Tadic is essentially inciting war.

He say: EULEX can go but without Kosova's custom/police operators. In other words KPS and customs of Kosova should go to gates 1 and 31 alone so they can be attacked by the Serbian criminals.

The answer can be: OK I send my custom and police operators armed to teeth and obliterate any threat that will be addressed to them.

It is obvious that EULEX and KFOR are doing all they can to avoid conflict buy staying between the two parties but also having to respecting their mandate: Kosova is unique customs zone.

If you take off EULEX/KFOR as Tadic is asking then the 2 parties will get in touch and the conflict will erupt in a second. It seems this is exactly what Tadic is asking- now strong with EU candidate status.

First error was accepting NATO occupation
Second error was to accept EULEX which had the political agenda of supporting nation building in favor of secessionists
Third error was to vote for Tadic

Tadic is essentially inciting war.

He say: EULEX can go but without Kosova's custom/police operators. In other words KPS and customs of Kosova should go to gates 1 and 31 alone so they can be attacked by the Serbian criminals.

The answer can be: OK I send my custom and police operators armed to teeth and obliterate any threat that will be addressed to them.

It is obvious that EULEX and KFOR are doing all they can to avoid conflict buy staying between the two parties but also having to respecting their mandate: Kosova is unique customs zone.

If you take off EULEX/KFOR as Tadic is asking then the 2 parties will get in touch and the conflict will erupt in a second. It seems this is exactly what Tadic is asking- now strong with EU candidate status.
(ben, 21 October 2011 20:15)

No dummy. The point is "Kosova's" custom police (terrorists) should NOT be at those gates.

And if a terrorist comes near the Serbs armed to the teeth they will obliterate the threat. Just like the terrorist that opened fire on them a couple months ago.

Indeed Mr Tadic, peace... While the Serbian people are experiencing nothing but peace in Kosovo, rather terrorism from NATO and from some albanians. What a disgrace you are for not acting on this, in years to come when you are gone, nobody will miss you or mourn you.

Yes, and under the resolution the international mission must be status neutral. They are not doing so by transporting the "Kosova" customs officers to the checkpoints. Therefore, we don't need to give them freedom of movement if that continues.
(Steve B., 21 October 2011 21:21)

No where does the word "neutral" appear on Resolution 1244...see for yourself at:

daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/172/89/PDF/N9917289.pdf?OpenElement


Furthermore:

"All United Nations General Assembly resolutions that are not about matters internal to the UN (such as the structure of the UN or the creation of UN agencies) are inherently and explicitly (in the UN Charter) non-binding."

You serbs need to learn that a membership in the UN does not constitute sovereignty or supreme law.
Thanks,

"ensured...they are not transporting members of Priština (Kosovo Albanian) institutions."

To me the messege is clear, Serbia wants divisions/partition of Kosovo, only an idiot can not understand that. It is placed in a crafty way, "compromise", "not use of foce", "no unilateral" moves. Is Serbia prepared to give up Presevo, Bujanovc and Medvagja "for the sake of northern Kosovo"? I personally doubt. Would EU be prepared to also devide Macedonia "for the sake" of Serbia? What it would be if Serbia officially accept independece of Kosovo and the REALLY talks about the rights of Serbs minority in Kosovo including north?

First error was allowing Jugoslavija to collapse.

Second error was allowing it to collapse through brutal wars instead of relatively peacefully (as in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia).

Third error was letting those wars drag on for far too long, rather than taking decisive action to stop them ASAP.

"You serbs need to learn that a membership in the UN does not constitute sovereignty or supreme law. "
(KOSO, 22 October 2011 01:22)

Some Kosovo Albanians need to learn than declaring an UDI means nothing at all and doesn't make a sovereign state.

Tadic is essentially inciting war.

He say: EULEX can go but without Kosova's custom/police operators. In other words KPS and customs of Kosova should go to gates 1 and 31 alone so they can be attacked by the Serbian criminals.

The answer can be: OK I send my custom and police operators armed to teeth and obliterate any threat that will be addressed to them.

It is obvious that EULEX and KFOR are doing all they can to avoid conflict buy staying between the two parties but also having to respecting their mandate: Kosova is unique customs zone.

If you take off EULEX/KFOR as Tadic is asking then the 2 parties will get in touch and the conflict will erupt in a second. It seems this is exactly what Tadic is asking- now strong with EU candidate status.

Tadic is essentially inciting war.

He say: EULEX can go but without Kosova's custom/police operators. In other words KPS and customs of Kosova should go to gates 1 and 31 alone so they can be attacked by the Serbian criminals.

The answer can be: OK I send my custom and police operators armed to teeth and obliterate any threat that will be addressed to them.

It is obvious that EULEX and KFOR are doing all they can to avoid conflict buy staying between the two parties but also having to respecting their mandate: Kosova is unique customs zone.

If you take off EULEX/KFOR as Tadic is asking then the 2 parties will get in touch and the conflict will erupt in a second. It seems this is exactly what Tadic is asking- now strong with EU candidate status.
(ben, 21 October 2011 20:15)

No dummy. The point is "Kosova's" custom police (terrorists) should NOT be at those gates.

And if a terrorist comes near the Serbs armed to the teeth they will obliterate the threat. Just like the terrorist that opened fire on them a couple months ago.

First error was accepting NATO occupation
Second error was to accept EULEX which had the political agenda of supporting nation building in favor of secessionists
Third error was to vote for Tadic

Providing supplies to KFOR and freedom of movement for the international mission constitute an obligation on the basis of the Military Technical Agreement in Kumanovo which Serbia adopted and the UN SC Resolution 1244.
-Tadic

Yes, and under the resolution the international mission must be status neutral. They are not doing so by transporting the "Kosova" customs officers to the checkpoints. Therefore, we don't need to give them freedom of movement if that continues.

Yes, and under the resolution the international mission must be status neutral. They are not doing so by transporting the "Kosova" customs officers to the checkpoints. Therefore, we don't need to give them freedom of movement if that continues.
(Steve B., 21 October 2011 21:21)

No where does the word "neutral" appear on Resolution 1244...see for yourself at:

daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/172/89/PDF/N9917289.pdf?OpenElement


Furthermore:

"All United Nations General Assembly resolutions that are not about matters internal to the UN (such as the structure of the UN or the creation of UN agencies) are inherently and explicitly (in the UN Charter) non-binding."

You serbs need to learn that a membership in the UN does not constitute sovereignty or supreme law.
Thanks,

"ensured...they are not transporting members of Priština (Kosovo Albanian) institutions."

To me the messege is clear, Serbia wants divisions/partition of Kosovo, only an idiot can not understand that. It is placed in a crafty way, "compromise", "not use of foce", "no unilateral" moves. Is Serbia prepared to give up Presevo, Bujanovc and Medvagja "for the sake of northern Kosovo"? I personally doubt. Would EU be prepared to also devide Macedonia "for the sake" of Serbia? What it would be if Serbia officially accept independece of Kosovo and the REALLY talks about the rights of Serbs minority in Kosovo including north?

First error was allowing Jugoslavija to collapse.

Second error was allowing it to collapse through brutal wars instead of relatively peacefully (as in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia).

Third error was letting those wars drag on for far too long, rather than taking decisive action to stop them ASAP.

Indeed Mr Tadic, peace... While the Serbian people are experiencing nothing but peace in Kosovo, rather terrorism from NATO and from some albanians. What a disgrace you are for not acting on this, in years to come when you are gone, nobody will miss you or mourn you.

"You serbs need to learn that a membership in the UN does not constitute sovereignty or supreme law. "
(KOSO, 22 October 2011 01:22)

Some Kosovo Albanians need to learn than declaring an UDI means nothing at all and doesn't make a sovereign state.