NATO agrees to extend Libya campaign

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments

I wonder if Nato will continue the bombardement when the fundamentalist Al-Qaida troops that they are now supporting starts to turn the weapons around at themselves and others?

To those who that are celebrating Gaddafi’s downfall, me thinks you are too early for the fireworks and partying. You see currently there is a great debate amongst the so called rebels over who should hold which ministry etc. I say debate because its much more pleasant word that what is really going on.
Part of those rebels are Al-Qaida groups; in fact the man who is leading the military part of this rebellion was an Al-Qaida operative who was captured and tortured by the US in Egypt. You see Al Qaida hates Gaddafi and has obviously lured the US into helping it into removing the only man capable of keeping the peace, much like Sad am Hussein in Iraq.
Watch as Libya falls into civil war and the west does not get a drop of Libyan oil. Oh by the time the free press from the west reports any of this the fighting will be in full swing.

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Still crying for your idole Gaddafi?
(Joe, 22 September 2011 18:49)

Your argument is really poor, You couldnt find anything wrong in my words so you had to make up some of your own. If you look through the archives of this site you'll find not a single pro-gaddafi comment (you shall find a few anti-gaddafi ones though). The fact that you've supported members of the Nazi party turns your comment from a poor one to something truly ironic.

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Where in UNSC Resolution 1977 or 1973 (which I think you meant) does it say that the Security Council has to do that? and where does it say NATO can't do that?

I look forwards to your response.

P.S.

Good luck with the Rugby.

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Still crying for your idole Gaddafi?

NATO, always finding their next excuse to try out their newest toys

Unseemly Scrabble for Libya’s Post-Gaddafi Oil Assets Underway

http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Unseemly-Scrabble-for-Libyas-Post-Gaddafi-Oil-Assets-Underway.html

Libya: Time of change, or oil discounts?

http://rt.com/news/libya-oil-france-conference/

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Still crying for your idole Gaddafi?

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Where in UNSC Resolution 1977 or 1973 (which I think you meant) does it say that the Security Council has to do that? and where does it say NATO can't do that?

I look forwards to your response.

P.S.

Good luck with the Rugby.

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments

I wonder if Nato will continue the bombardement when the fundamentalist Al-Qaida troops that they are now supporting starts to turn the weapons around at themselves and others?

NATO, always finding their next excuse to try out their newest toys

Unseemly Scrabble for Libya’s Post-Gaddafi Oil Assets Underway

http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Unseemly-Scrabble-for-Libyas-Post-Gaddafi-Oil-Assets-Underway.html

Libya: Time of change, or oil discounts?

http://rt.com/news/libya-oil-france-conference/

To those who that are celebrating Gaddafi’s downfall, me thinks you are too early for the fireworks and partying. You see currently there is a great debate amongst the so called rebels over who should hold which ministry etc. I say debate because its much more pleasant word that what is really going on.
Part of those rebels are Al-Qaida groups; in fact the man who is leading the military part of this rebellion was an Al-Qaida operative who was captured and tortured by the US in Egypt. You see Al Qaida hates Gaddafi and has obviously lured the US into helping it into removing the only man capable of keeping the peace, much like Sad am Hussein in Iraq.
Watch as Libya falls into civil war and the west does not get a drop of Libyan oil. Oh by the time the free press from the west reports any of this the fighting will be in full swing.

Its not up to Nato to extend the campaign past the date set by UNSC resolution 1977, that is up to the UN Security Council, this has not happened, so as of now, it is an illegal war and Obama, along with the current generation of Nato leaders are in effect war criminals, if not for double standards, we'd be expecting some indictments
(New Zealander, 22 September 2011 11:01)

Still crying for your idole Gaddafi?
(Joe, 22 September 2011 18:49)

Your argument is really poor, You couldnt find anything wrong in my words so you had to make up some of your own. If you look through the archives of this site you'll find not a single pro-gaddafi comment (you shall find a few anti-gaddafi ones though). The fact that you've supported members of the Nazi party turns your comment from a poor one to something truly ironic.