4

Thursday, 01.09.2016.

09:10

Dodik: Serb Republic is state, Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing

A day after the Peace Implementation Council said it was advising the RS not to hold a planned referendum, a strong response arrived from Banja Luka.

Izvor: B92

Dodik: Serb Republic is state, Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

4 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

Comm. Parrisson

pre 7 godina

Dodik: Serb Republic is state, Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing

Funny guy. The typical Serb politician. So, the whole world knows that Bosnia-Herzegovina is a state, teh Serb Republic is an entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina. If he doesn't have a clue, he should have asked Mr. Vucic.

Paul

pre 7 godina

Yes, Bosnia is nothing. Remember again what won the peace and is keeping the peace.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has a bicameral legislature and a three-member Presidency composed of a member of each major ethnic group. However, the central government's power is highly limited, as the country is largely decentralized and comprises two autonomous entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska, ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

Let RS have its day, nobody is injured. The FB&H part of B&H is confusing itself with Bosnia itself, a poor mistake to make in the interest of peace.

rogaroga

pre 7 godina

peter the rock, why would you think that? aren't people allowed the right to self determination in your view point? didn't the whole break up of jugoslavia hinge upon this notion of the right to self determination, and that right trumping all other geo-political realities?
you may considering mentioning dayton: a political agreement.
you may consider un resolutions (specifically 1244 -- as you're aware of it): a political agreement.
you may consider the geo-political map of the the balkan, europe and the world as a whole circa 1990, when jugoslavia existed and their constitution which didn't allow for referendum and rights of self determination.
you'll notice that in cases where there was a political agreement that fell out of favour later in the future, it was no longer recognized, in favour of recognizing a self-determination movement.
now, are you suggesting that rs doesn't have that same right, that others had? what would be the specific justifications, that are different from those that would have held jugoslavia together, and kosovo within serbia? remember that jugoslav disintegration and political acceptance happened well before any physical warring started.
i'd be interested in hear your opinion on the matter, not just your predictions.

Peter the Rocky

pre 7 godina

Looks like the radical Serbs in banja Luka with the main nest of pests in Belgrade in full support, are intent with re-igniting Southern Europe in yet
another inferno!
Serbia will soon yell out ouch!!!

Peter the Rocky

pre 7 godina

Looks like the radical Serbs in banja Luka with the main nest of pests in Belgrade in full support, are intent with re-igniting Southern Europe in yet
another inferno!
Serbia will soon yell out ouch!!!

rogaroga

pre 7 godina

peter the rock, why would you think that? aren't people allowed the right to self determination in your view point? didn't the whole break up of jugoslavia hinge upon this notion of the right to self determination, and that right trumping all other geo-political realities?
you may considering mentioning dayton: a political agreement.
you may consider un resolutions (specifically 1244 -- as you're aware of it): a political agreement.
you may consider the geo-political map of the the balkan, europe and the world as a whole circa 1990, when jugoslavia existed and their constitution which didn't allow for referendum and rights of self determination.
you'll notice that in cases where there was a political agreement that fell out of favour later in the future, it was no longer recognized, in favour of recognizing a self-determination movement.
now, are you suggesting that rs doesn't have that same right, that others had? what would be the specific justifications, that are different from those that would have held jugoslavia together, and kosovo within serbia? remember that jugoslav disintegration and political acceptance happened well before any physical warring started.
i'd be interested in hear your opinion on the matter, not just your predictions.

Paul

pre 7 godina

Yes, Bosnia is nothing. Remember again what won the peace and is keeping the peace.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has a bicameral legislature and a three-member Presidency composed of a member of each major ethnic group. However, the central government's power is highly limited, as the country is largely decentralized and comprises two autonomous entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska, ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

Let RS have its day, nobody is injured. The FB&H part of B&H is confusing itself with Bosnia itself, a poor mistake to make in the interest of peace.

Comm. Parrisson

pre 7 godina

Dodik: Serb Republic is state, Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing

Funny guy. The typical Serb politician. So, the whole world knows that Bosnia-Herzegovina is a state, teh Serb Republic is an entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina. If he doesn't have a clue, he should have asked Mr. Vucic.

Peter the Rocky

pre 7 godina

Looks like the radical Serbs in banja Luka with the main nest of pests in Belgrade in full support, are intent with re-igniting Southern Europe in yet
another inferno!
Serbia will soon yell out ouch!!!

rogaroga

pre 7 godina

peter the rock, why would you think that? aren't people allowed the right to self determination in your view point? didn't the whole break up of jugoslavia hinge upon this notion of the right to self determination, and that right trumping all other geo-political realities?
you may considering mentioning dayton: a political agreement.
you may consider un resolutions (specifically 1244 -- as you're aware of it): a political agreement.
you may consider the geo-political map of the the balkan, europe and the world as a whole circa 1990, when jugoslavia existed and their constitution which didn't allow for referendum and rights of self determination.
you'll notice that in cases where there was a political agreement that fell out of favour later in the future, it was no longer recognized, in favour of recognizing a self-determination movement.
now, are you suggesting that rs doesn't have that same right, that others had? what would be the specific justifications, that are different from those that would have held jugoslavia together, and kosovo within serbia? remember that jugoslav disintegration and political acceptance happened well before any physical warring started.
i'd be interested in hear your opinion on the matter, not just your predictions.

Paul

pre 7 godina

Yes, Bosnia is nothing. Remember again what won the peace and is keeping the peace.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has a bicameral legislature and a three-member Presidency composed of a member of each major ethnic group. However, the central government's power is highly limited, as the country is largely decentralized and comprises two autonomous entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska, ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

Let RS have its day, nobody is injured. The FB&H part of B&H is confusing itself with Bosnia itself, a poor mistake to make in the interest of peace.

Comm. Parrisson

pre 7 godina

Dodik: Serb Republic is state, Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing

Funny guy. The typical Serb politician. So, the whole world knows that Bosnia-Herzegovina is a state, teh Serb Republic is an entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina. If he doesn't have a clue, he should have asked Mr. Vucic.