Serbia's protest to Croatia: You're rehabilitating fascism

(Sieg Fail, 26 July 2016 17:26)

And mind you, Nedic hasn't even been rehabilitated. General Draza Mihailovich was which was long overdue considering he was posthumously decorated and honored by the United States and France way back in the 50s. How Croatia can rehabilitate this Nazi cleric and not feel any shred of shame is beyond me.

I guess they used Serbia's previous rehabilitation of fascism as an example
(double standards, 26 July 2016 16:02)

Equating the microscopic support Nedic and Ljotic had in the 1940s with the NDH, the biggest Nazi puppet state with open and active collaborators who ran their own extermination camps is a bit of a stretch for you to relativize. Nedic has no business being rehabilitated but he's nowhere near the cult national figure seen as Stepinac is in Croatia, and last I checked, Serbia doesn't rename streets or squares after Ustasha war criminals or give Nazi salutes at football games. Tito did Croatian intelligence a big disservice when he put the Cetniks and Ustashe on the same level. It's the only thing Croats still follow unwavering from him.

I guess they used Serbia's previous rehabilitation of fascism as an example

Croatia's bout with fascism ended in 1945. Serbia's continues today.

Serbia has sent so many protest notes it can be said Serbia is is just barking and doing nothing. The dog that barks doesn't bite, says an old proverb.

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

Are you on ice? Because that can only explain some of your questions.

General Draza Mihailovich was which was long overdue considering he was posthumously decorated and honored by the United States and France way back in the 50s.
(Ari Gold, 26 July 2016 18:50)

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

The role of the U.S. politically in WWII is far different than its role in the last 20 years.

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

The role of the U.S. politically in WWII is far different than its role in the last 20 years.
(Ari Gold, 27 July 2016 10:37)

Of course, nobody questioned that!

The question is whether Serb people should be judged based on what the United States says about them?

Croatia's bout with fascism ended in 1945. Serbia's continues today.

I guess they used Serbia's previous rehabilitation of fascism as an example

Serbia has sent so many protest notes it can be said Serbia is is just barking and doing nothing. The dog that barks doesn't bite, says an old proverb.

I guess they used Serbia's previous rehabilitation of fascism as an example
(double standards, 26 July 2016 16:02)

Equating the microscopic support Nedic and Ljotic had in the 1940s with the NDH, the biggest Nazi puppet state with open and active collaborators who ran their own extermination camps is a bit of a stretch for you to relativize. Nedic has no business being rehabilitated but he's nowhere near the cult national figure seen as Stepinac is in Croatia, and last I checked, Serbia doesn't rename streets or squares after Ustasha war criminals or give Nazi salutes at football games. Tito did Croatian intelligence a big disservice when he put the Cetniks and Ustashe on the same level. It's the only thing Croats still follow unwavering from him.

(Sieg Fail, 26 July 2016 17:26)

And mind you, Nedic hasn't even been rehabilitated. General Draza Mihailovich was which was long overdue considering he was posthumously decorated and honored by the United States and France way back in the 50s. How Croatia can rehabilitate this Nazi cleric and not feel any shred of shame is beyond me.

General Draza Mihailovich was which was long overdue considering he was posthumously decorated and honored by the United States and France way back in the 50s.
(Ari Gold, 26 July 2016 18:50)

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

Are you on ice? Because that can only explain some of your questions.

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

The role of the U.S. politically in WWII is far different than its role in the last 20 years.

So Serbia judges Serb people based on the opinion that the United States has for them?!
(icj1, 27 July 2016 01:19)

The role of the U.S. politically in WWII is far different than its role in the last 20 years.
(Ari Gold, 27 July 2016 10:37)

Of course, nobody questioned that!

The question is whether Serb people should be judged based on what the United States says about them?