Serb member of presidency "won't allow" revision of lawsuit

OK, game over. Now lets move onto something a little more entertaining, like CIA-backed terrorists and Pentagon-backed terrorists fighting each other in Syria. Check -> https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337646-syrian-showdown-pentagon-rebels

"Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!"
1) This is not true. ISIS are not at any peace talks.
2) The peace that Assad wants is for everyone except him to stop killing so it will likely be a false peace.
3) NATO brought warring parties in Serbia to the peace table in 3 months, did it make you happy?
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 18:03)

To Dwight,
No, NATO took 3 years in Bosnia ,and 10 years in Kosovo. What would have made me happy, is no war in the Balkans (like Czech - Slovakia ).and no blood spill at all.I am a believer of compromise would be the way to go.
But the Balkans people are the most stubborn in the world, and war's had to be.
P's Islamic State, would never exist if no void was left when USA overthrew
governments on lies like in Iraq,Libya etc.

The Pentagon is supporting the SDF Kurds in NE Syria who are fighting ISIS.
The SDF in NW Syria who are fighting rebels are a different group and these have recently been supported by Russia
The USA do not support the SDF where SDF are fighting rebels

They are under the same umbrella organisation, so I can see why RT would use the opportunity to score points.


Similarly Russia/Assad is supporting Afrin SDF to fight rebels, also supporting ISIS to fight rebels and also directly fighting against ISIS.
They do not support ISIS or SDF where ISIS or SDF are fighting Assad

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.

I am not a fan of what Russia is doing in Syria because they are supporting Assad who is the biggest terrorist of all.
Their other ally is Iran who are the biggest supporters of terrorism in the world, they probably do more interfering in other countries than USA/CHina/Russia combined and it is probably going to get worse now that they are getting access to frozen assets and world markets.

Assad could have fought ISIS for 10 years but has instead encouraged them, now he wants to be seen as some sort of anti-ISIS leader? Would be funny if so many people were not dead. He has killed more people (both civilians and fighters) in Syria than anyone else. B4 the rebellion, Assad allowed ISIS to use Syria as a base to attack Iraq. They were trained in Syria and injured fighters rested in Syria (to a much greater extent that what Russia accuses Turkey of doing).
Under pressure Assad reduced this but when the rebellion started, Assad released ISIS terrorists from jail and put protesters in.

Russia says it is fighting ISIS yet only fights them as necessary to support Assad. I guess they may eventually fight ISIS full-on, but only when it suits.
The peace talks are a joke. Through the use of bombs, NATO brought peace in a matter of months to Serbia but you still moan about that, so why do you find it acceptable in Syria?
Russia has killed an estimated 2000 civilians so far in Syria compared to NATO's 500 in Serbia, again why is this ok but the deaths from NATO bombs are not?

The Pentagon is supporting the SDF Kurds in NE Syria who are fighting ISIS.
The SDF in NW Syria who are fighting rebels are a different group and these have recently been supported by Russia
The USA do not support the SDF where SDF are fighting rebels

They are under the same umbrella organisation, so I can see why RT would use the opportunity to score points.


Similarly Russia/Assad is supporting Afrin SDF to fight rebels, also supporting ISIS to fight rebels and also directly fighting against ISIS.
They do not support ISIS or SDF where ISIS or SDF are fighting Assad

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 13:50)

To Dwight,
All I know is that,who secretly USA is supporting in the conflicts in the Middle East (Iraq,Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc,etc),"doesn't smell,feel,and taste nice"!.
Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!.
P's too,too much CNN, and BBC propaganda, not good for your soul!.

(sasa.p from Jagodina, Serbia, 30 March 2016 16:52)

"All I know is that,who secretly USA is supporting in the conflicts in the Middle East (Iraq,Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc,etc),"doesn't smell,feel,and taste nice"!"

WHo is the USA secretly supporting in ME and if it is a secret, how do you know about it?

"Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!"
1) This is not true. ISIS are not at any peace talks.
2) The peace that Assad wants is for everyone except him to stop killing so it will likely be a false peace.
3) NATO brought warring parties in Serbia to the peace table in 3 months, did it make you happy?

Dwight, your brain is fried by CNN/BBC I'm afraid. There was no war in Serbia until NATO started bombing. There were OSCE observers reporting mainly of terrorist activity by the KLA. You should read the reports, might enlighten you slightly. Racak was a hoax and shown to be at the NATO court (i.e bullet holes did not match clothing).

As for Syria, the fighting has stopped except for anti-terrorist activity. Thanks to Russia, there is a chance for real peace now. As for your opinion about key figures, irrelevant. It is up to the people of Syria to decide.

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 13:50)
--
Why wouldn't you be a fan of what Russia has done in Syria? After years of war, Russia has brought peace after a matter of months but continues to target terrorists. Now the warring factions are in peace talks. I'd say that is progress in the right direction regardless of news source, however, the western press have been quite mute regarding Russia's success.

I obviously read more than I link but the propaganda coming from western sources is just too obvious to digest.

Through the use of bombs, NATO brought peace in a matter of months to Serbia but you still moan about that, so why do you find it acceptable in Syria?
Russia has killed an estimated 2000 civilians so far in Syria compared to NATO's 500 in Serbia, again why is this ok but the deaths from NATO bombs are not?
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 16:45) # Comment

Pure rubbish and you are talking about others and news sources.

The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 was tearing apart the NATO coalition, Greece did not participate, Italian, German and English public opinion were swaying against the illegal bombing of a sovereign country. What eventually brought a stalemate was Russian intervention first with Primakov and then later with Russian Envoy Victor Cheromydin who eventually brokered UN resolution 1244. What will bring future conflict is the complete disregard of UN resolution 1244 by the EU and Albanian proxies.

Over 1 thousand Yugoslav civilians were killed not the 500 you quote from you mickey mouse research of Wilkpedia.

(Jugoslavija, 30 March 2016 21:10)

My 500 civilian estimate is from HRW which is also the source for wikipedia.
The serbian gov says 1500-1900 plus 630 soldiers, NATO says 5000 soldiers plus civilians but neither provide any data to back this up

You call Wikipedia mickey-mouse but at least half of your comments are just copy pasted from there?!!!
Are you Zoran in disguise, he slates BBC and then quotes their journalists when it suits?

(Jugoslavija, 30 March 2016 21:10)

My 500 civilian estimate is from HRW which is also the source for wikipedia.
The serbian gov says 1500-1900 plus 630 soldiers, NATO says 5000 soldiers plus civilians but neither provide any data to back this up

You call Wikipedia mickey-mouse but at least half of your comments are just copy pasted from there?!!!
Are you Zoran in disguise, he slates BBC and then quotes their journalists when it suits?
(Dwight, 31 March 2016 12:56)

Sorry, unlike yourself, I don't articles from an encyclopedia.

Maybe you should direct those other comments to Zoran, no idea what sources he uses.

OK, game over. Now lets move onto something a little more entertaining, like CIA-backed terrorists and Pentagon-backed terrorists fighting each other in Syria. Check -> https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337646-syrian-showdown-pentagon-rebels

I am not a fan of what Russia is doing in Syria because they are supporting Assad who is the biggest terrorist of all.
Their other ally is Iran who are the biggest supporters of terrorism in the world, they probably do more interfering in other countries than USA/CHina/Russia combined and it is probably going to get worse now that they are getting access to frozen assets and world markets.

Assad could have fought ISIS for 10 years but has instead encouraged them, now he wants to be seen as some sort of anti-ISIS leader? Would be funny if so many people were not dead. He has killed more people (both civilians and fighters) in Syria than anyone else. B4 the rebellion, Assad allowed ISIS to use Syria as a base to attack Iraq. They were trained in Syria and injured fighters rested in Syria (to a much greater extent that what Russia accuses Turkey of doing).
Under pressure Assad reduced this but when the rebellion started, Assad released ISIS terrorists from jail and put protesters in.

Russia says it is fighting ISIS yet only fights them as necessary to support Assad. I guess they may eventually fight ISIS full-on, but only when it suits.
The peace talks are a joke. Through the use of bombs, NATO brought peace in a matter of months to Serbia but you still moan about that, so why do you find it acceptable in Syria?
Russia has killed an estimated 2000 civilians so far in Syria compared to NATO's 500 in Serbia, again why is this ok but the deaths from NATO bombs are not?

"Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!"
1) This is not true. ISIS are not at any peace talks.
2) The peace that Assad wants is for everyone except him to stop killing so it will likely be a false peace.
3) NATO brought warring parties in Serbia to the peace table in 3 months, did it make you happy?
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 18:03)

To Dwight,
No, NATO took 3 years in Bosnia ,and 10 years in Kosovo. What would have made me happy, is no war in the Balkans (like Czech - Slovakia ).and no blood spill at all.I am a believer of compromise would be the way to go.
But the Balkans people are the most stubborn in the world, and war's had to be.
P's Islamic State, would never exist if no void was left when USA overthrew
governments on lies like in Iraq,Libya etc.

(sasa.p from Jagodina, Serbia, 30 March 2016 16:52)

"All I know is that,who secretly USA is supporting in the conflicts in the Middle East (Iraq,Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc,etc),"doesn't smell,feel,and taste nice"!"

WHo is the USA secretly supporting in ME and if it is a secret, how do you know about it?

"Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!"
1) This is not true. ISIS are not at any peace talks.
2) The peace that Assad wants is for everyone except him to stop killing so it will likely be a false peace.
3) NATO brought warring parties in Serbia to the peace table in 3 months, did it make you happy?

Dwight, your brain is fried by CNN/BBC I'm afraid. There was no war in Serbia until NATO started bombing. There were OSCE observers reporting mainly of terrorist activity by the KLA. You should read the reports, might enlighten you slightly. Racak was a hoax and shown to be at the NATO court (i.e bullet holes did not match clothing).

As for Syria, the fighting has stopped except for anti-terrorist activity. Thanks to Russia, there is a chance for real peace now. As for your opinion about key figures, irrelevant. It is up to the people of Syria to decide.

The Pentagon is supporting the SDF Kurds in NE Syria who are fighting ISIS.
The SDF in NW Syria who are fighting rebels are a different group and these have recently been supported by Russia
The USA do not support the SDF where SDF are fighting rebels

They are under the same umbrella organisation, so I can see why RT would use the opportunity to score points.


Similarly Russia/Assad is supporting Afrin SDF to fight rebels, also supporting ISIS to fight rebels and also directly fighting against ISIS.
They do not support ISIS or SDF where ISIS or SDF are fighting Assad

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.

The Pentagon is supporting the SDF Kurds in NE Syria who are fighting ISIS.
The SDF in NW Syria who are fighting rebels are a different group and these have recently been supported by Russia
The USA do not support the SDF where SDF are fighting rebels

They are under the same umbrella organisation, so I can see why RT would use the opportunity to score points.


Similarly Russia/Assad is supporting Afrin SDF to fight rebels, also supporting ISIS to fight rebels and also directly fighting against ISIS.
They do not support ISIS or SDF where ISIS or SDF are fighting Assad

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 13:50)

To Dwight,
All I know is that,who secretly USA is supporting in the conflicts in the Middle East (Iraq,Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc,etc),"doesn't smell,feel,and taste nice"!.
Russia on the other hand has brought all warring parties to the peace table within 6 month's!. Get the difference!!.
P's too,too much CNN, and BBC propaganda, not good for your soul!.

Through the use of bombs, NATO brought peace in a matter of months to Serbia but you still moan about that, so why do you find it acceptable in Syria?
Russia has killed an estimated 2000 civilians so far in Syria compared to NATO's 500 in Serbia, again why is this ok but the deaths from NATO bombs are not?
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 16:45) # Comment

Pure rubbish and you are talking about others and news sources.

The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 was tearing apart the NATO coalition, Greece did not participate, Italian, German and English public opinion were swaying against the illegal bombing of a sovereign country. What eventually brought a stalemate was Russian intervention first with Primakov and then later with Russian Envoy Victor Cheromydin who eventually brokered UN resolution 1244. What will bring future conflict is the complete disregard of UN resolution 1244 by the EU and Albanian proxies.

Over 1 thousand Yugoslav civilians were killed not the 500 you quote from you mickey mouse research of Wilkpedia.

Zoran , I am not a fan of what USA or what anyone in Syria is doing, but you seriously need to change the sites where you get your information.
If RT was renamed to Kremlin-Info-Wars it might be less confusing.
(Dwight, 30 March 2016 13:50)
--
Why wouldn't you be a fan of what Russia has done in Syria? After years of war, Russia has brought peace after a matter of months but continues to target terrorists. Now the warring factions are in peace talks. I'd say that is progress in the right direction regardless of news source, however, the western press have been quite mute regarding Russia's success.

I obviously read more than I link but the propaganda coming from western sources is just too obvious to digest.

(Jugoslavija, 30 March 2016 21:10)

My 500 civilian estimate is from HRW which is also the source for wikipedia.
The serbian gov says 1500-1900 plus 630 soldiers, NATO says 5000 soldiers plus civilians but neither provide any data to back this up

You call Wikipedia mickey-mouse but at least half of your comments are just copy pasted from there?!!!
Are you Zoran in disguise, he slates BBC and then quotes their journalists when it suits?

(Jugoslavija, 30 March 2016 21:10)

My 500 civilian estimate is from HRW which is also the source for wikipedia.
The serbian gov says 1500-1900 plus 630 soldiers, NATO says 5000 soldiers plus civilians but neither provide any data to back this up

You call Wikipedia mickey-mouse but at least half of your comments are just copy pasted from there?!!!
Are you Zoran in disguise, he slates BBC and then quotes their journalists when it suits?
(Dwight, 31 March 2016 12:56)

Sorry, unlike yourself, I don't articles from an encyclopedia.

Maybe you should direct those other comments to Zoran, no idea what sources he uses.