Serbs killed in eastern Bosnia on Christmas Day remembered

There must be something deeply wrong with you, Amnisty. With your brain, Amnisty. That's why you can't understand why this crime couldn't be part of the ordinary crimes category, because these crimes were ethnically motivated crimes, Amnisty. Against the Serbs, Amnisty. Who are not claiming that what happened was a genocide, Amnisty. So far so bad, Amnisty.

To Amnesty Yugoslavia,
It was a crime committed against a race of people, not just a crime.It was a crime or genocide that targeted specifically a race of civilian's on their holiest day that murdered them,by the Bosnian Muslim army.Don't forget it happen 2 1/2 years before the war crime of the Bosnian soldiers getting killed in Srebinica.

Bosnia Charges Former Presidency Member With War Crimes
Borislav Paravac, who served as the Serb member of Bosnia's tripartite presidency from 2003 to 2006, is accused of "willing and active" participation in deportation, looting, beatings, torture and killing of non-Serb civilians near the northern towns of Doboj and Teslic, prosecutors said Thursday.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/bosnia-charges-presidency-member-war-crimes-36026957

Why is it so difficult for B92 to categorize this in the crime section of their web site? Miss-labeled as a "Region" piece is inconsistent with the representation of other crimes from the same period.

No sasa P the bosniaks you killed were not soldiers, you killed the most civilians in the war, I even question whether these serbs were civilians given the way you like to lie about stuff like that, ps sasa if the date of the crimeis important lets not forget that you were killeing civilians way back in 1991, so you are still the bad guys who killed mostly civilians and lost mostly soldiers

No sasa, the bosniaks did not invade bosnia as they are natives, the serbs invaded the balkan in the 7th century, those are accepted facts, if you want to go back that far, however going only to modern times serbs were attacking civilians in 1991, were arming themselves in 1989, most serbs killed were soldiers thats a fact, in fact some serb "civilians" had more weaponry than bosnian soldiers. Most bosniaks killed were civilians, thats a fact, and some bosnian "soldiers" were unarmed the fact is mladic was mad that even with an absolute advantage he couldn't win, so out of anger killed many bosnian civilians, which they were doing anyway but at a smaller scale, but you can deny it all you want, your reputation precedes you

To pope f,
You Mussi have been killing the Serb civilians, before 1991.I mean since you invaded Serbia 1389,if for you time is not important.
The 8800 soldiers, why not balloon it to 10,000 and round off the number.All males where fighting or fighters ,and slaughtered around 2000 locals and cilivans 3 years before , the war even fully started.So Mladic pay back,your soldiers in 1995, for what they did 1991-1992.

(sasa.p, 5 January 2016 23:21)

You're seriously trying to compare a massacre of 49 people to a massacre of 8800?

Why is it so difficult for B92 to categorize this in the crime section of their web site? Miss-labeled as a "Region" piece is inconsistent with the representation of other crimes from the same period.

To Amnesty Yugoslavia,
It was a crime committed against a race of people, not just a crime.It was a crime or genocide that targeted specifically a race of civilian's on their holiest day that murdered them,by the Bosnian Muslim army.Don't forget it happen 2 1/2 years before the war crime of the Bosnian soldiers getting killed in Srebinica.

Bosnia Charges Former Presidency Member With War Crimes
Borislav Paravac, who served as the Serb member of Bosnia's tripartite presidency from 2003 to 2006, is accused of "willing and active" participation in deportation, looting, beatings, torture and killing of non-Serb civilians near the northern towns of Doboj and Teslic, prosecutors said Thursday.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/bosnia-charges-presidency-member-war-crimes-36026957

(sasa.p, 5 January 2016 23:21)

You're seriously trying to compare a massacre of 49 people to a massacre of 8800?

There must be something deeply wrong with you, Amnisty. With your brain, Amnisty. That's why you can't understand why this crime couldn't be part of the ordinary crimes category, because these crimes were ethnically motivated crimes, Amnisty. Against the Serbs, Amnisty. Who are not claiming that what happened was a genocide, Amnisty. So far so bad, Amnisty.

No sasa P the bosniaks you killed were not soldiers, you killed the most civilians in the war, I even question whether these serbs were civilians given the way you like to lie about stuff like that, ps sasa if the date of the crimeis important lets not forget that you were killeing civilians way back in 1991, so you are still the bad guys who killed mostly civilians and lost mostly soldiers

To pope f,
You Mussi have been killing the Serb civilians, before 1991.I mean since you invaded Serbia 1389,if for you time is not important.
The 8800 soldiers, why not balloon it to 10,000 and round off the number.All males where fighting or fighters ,and slaughtered around 2000 locals and cilivans 3 years before , the war even fully started.So Mladic pay back,your soldiers in 1995, for what they did 1991-1992.

No sasa, the bosniaks did not invade bosnia as they are natives, the serbs invaded the balkan in the 7th century, those are accepted facts, if you want to go back that far, however going only to modern times serbs were attacking civilians in 1991, were arming themselves in 1989, most serbs killed were soldiers thats a fact, in fact some serb "civilians" had more weaponry than bosnian soldiers. Most bosniaks killed were civilians, thats a fact, and some bosnian "soldiers" were unarmed the fact is mladic was mad that even with an absolute advantage he couldn't win, so out of anger killed many bosnian civilians, which they were doing anyway but at a smaller scale, but you can deny it all you want, your reputation precedes you