President to miss Srebrenica commemoration

Of course he won't attend, at the time when this massacre of 8000 civilians happened he was one of Vojislav Seseljs lapdogs, the same Vojislav that sent many of his own paramilitary units to participate in that evil deed! Yet, when invited to attend a victory parade in Russia something he wasn't even alive for, he runs there as a world class sprinter? Maybe its for the vodka & some pipeline payouts? A true trickster in a bad disguise, a rat by my definition!!!

"The article said that Bosnian Serb forces overran the enclave in eastern Bosnia 20 years ago killing about 8,000 Muslims, mostly men and young men, and that this was the biggest crime in Europe since WW2 for which Ratko Mladic is on trial at the Hague Tribunal."

Great reporting, B92. What do you want to tell the readers? That only 'the article' says so? And you think that the Srebrenica massacre (which was without a doubt the greatest massacre in Europe since WW2) didn't happen? Shame on you.

And yes, it's not surprising that former radical Nicolic who still denies the Srebrenica genocide (though the ICJ ruled so) won't attend.
And his stupid nonsense idea to visit to Serb graves as well.

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.

He won't go to Srebrenica, but he'll go to Moscow?

Those killed were killed in combat and not in some concentration camp. Do you not see the difference?
(Peggy, 20 May 2015 14:36)

It would be more like the Katyn massacre than Hitlers camps. They were not killed in combat. It was the organised execution of about 8000 unarmed prisoners. These people were murdered and the bodies bulldozed into large pits.
Yes they let the women go, many of them were raped first.

"Did you forget about him?
(Peggy, 20 May 2015 14:36)"

Oric was acquitted for war crimes, so your only left with typical conspiracy theories of anti-Serb bias and/or propaganda.

How Kitarovic of him to miss the commemoration.

Just like he had to "travel" to Moscow when Edi Rama visited Belgrade (and he ended up watching him from his TV). This guy is a shameless coward...

From Rocky: "the same Vojislav that sent many of his own paramilitary units to participate in that evil deed!"

Hey Rocky - Is this the same Vojislav Sesilj who was on trial for 11 years and not convicted of anything?

Perhaps you have some evidence that didn't make it to the Hague. Why don't you testify since you seem to be sure that he is guilty of war crimes. Cowards like you never come forward though, they just blow smoke annonomously from behind your keybord.

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 12:40)
----------------------------------
No, it wouldn't be anything like it. Those killed were killed in combat and not in some concentration camp. Do you not see the difference?
Women and children were allowed to leave. Were Jewish women and children allowed to leave any camp?
Those men and young men were trying to kill Serbs and were killing Serbs in surrounding villages.
Comparing the two is not only immoral but a great insult to the victims of Nazis and Serbian victims of Oric. Did you forget about him?

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 12:40)

Unless these Serbs actually took part in killing Bosnians, this is a poor comparison. You're almost always on the mark with your comments, but this time you're just plain wrong.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)
I have searched through a lot on google and very interested in where you found an official report of the youngest being 13-14. I did find claims of children as young as 5. I was going to keep digging and thought the easiest way would be to ask for your sources.

After reading all the comments I could only come to one conclusion and that is anyone who defends the actions at Srebrenica whether male or female have as much blood on their hands as the men issueing the orders and those who fired the shots. But what is worse is that they live in other countries such as Australia and they and their offspring will infect the areas with their vile hatred for many many years.

Are you actually saying that these males were civilians?
Don't forget that Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks. So much evidence out there proving that. So to kill the people who were murdering Serbs in surrounding villages is not a crime? We should be commemorating that?
(Peggy, 21 May 2015 01:22)

But did those specific 13/14 year old boys who were executed actually attack or kill anybody?!!! According to your logic above, every Muslim boy alive should be mssacred, because there is evidence that "Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks"!!!!!!!!!!

And, even if they did, you still don't execute a 13/14 year old boy!!! To be honest mate, I think it's very useful to have you write stuff like the above - there is no better way to discredit what some monsters did in the name of Serbs then reading your sickening comments trying to justify a massacre of 13/14 year old boys in the middle of Europe at the end of the 20th century!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S. In case you did not notice, I did not say "what Serbs did", because I'm sure that the vast majority of Serbs are not monsters to massacre 13/14 year old boys, regardless of what they might have done, if they had done anything at all.

"Unless these Serbs actually took part in killing Bosnians, this is a poor comparison. You're almost always on the mark with your comments, but this time you're just plain wrong."
(Balkan Anthropologist, 20 May 2015 16:58)

Why? The Srebrenica massacre commemoration is not like laying wrests for killed soldiers, but to commemorate victims of the worst massacre in Europe since WW2 - so I still think it's comparable.

And it's not a good sign not to attend. It says a lot that Tadic was the last high official of Serbia that participated in that commemoration.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.

Good, because we don't want him and the other chetnik fascists to come...

Why? The Srebrenica massacre commemoration is not like laying wrests for killed soldiers, but to commemorate victims of the worst massacre in Europe since WW2 - so I still think it's comparable.

And it's not a good sign not to attend. It says a lot that Tadic was the last high official of Serbia that participated in that commemoration.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)
==========================================
Are you actually saying that these males were civilians?
Don't forget that Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks. So much evidence out there proving that. So to kill the people who were murdering Serbs in surrounding villages is not a crime? We should be commemorating that?
Are any Bosniaks going to commemorate the deaths of thousands of Serbs at the hands of thse "innocent civilians" (women and children included) in that area? If not, why not? Didn't happen?

Serbia's where swell killed in 1993 which cause fighting I'm that area ,which resulted from winning in 1992 to defaet in 1995 . What comes around goes around ,get it Muslim's.

Oric was acquitted for war crimes, so your only left with typical conspiracy theories of anti-Serb bias and/or propaganda.
(LK, 20 May 2015 15:52)
==================
Sure, just live Gotovina was innocent.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)

Of course, 13/14 years old could have posed a risk of attacking a Serb when they grew up... Since Serbs are God's chosen, anybody who might even remotely even thing to threaten their security must be anihilited, even if 13/14 years old!

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 12:40)
----------------------------------
No, it wouldn't be anything like it. Those killed were killed in combat and not in some concentration camp. Do you not see the difference?
Women and children were allowed to leave. Were Jewish women and children allowed to leave any camp?
Those men and young men were trying to kill Serbs and were killing Serbs in surrounding villages.
Comparing the two is not only immoral but a great insult to the victims of Nazis and Serbian victims of Oric. Did you forget about him?

Of course he won't attend, at the time when this massacre of 8000 civilians happened he was one of Vojislav Seseljs lapdogs, the same Vojislav that sent many of his own paramilitary units to participate in that evil deed! Yet, when invited to attend a victory parade in Russia something he wasn't even alive for, he runs there as a world class sprinter? Maybe its for the vodka & some pipeline payouts? A true trickster in a bad disguise, a rat by my definition!!!

"The article said that Bosnian Serb forces overran the enclave in eastern Bosnia 20 years ago killing about 8,000 Muslims, mostly men and young men, and that this was the biggest crime in Europe since WW2 for which Ratko Mladic is on trial at the Hague Tribunal."

Great reporting, B92. What do you want to tell the readers? That only 'the article' says so? And you think that the Srebrenica massacre (which was without a doubt the greatest massacre in Europe since WW2) didn't happen? Shame on you.

And yes, it's not surprising that former radical Nicolic who still denies the Srebrenica genocide (though the ICJ ruled so) won't attend.
And his stupid nonsense idea to visit to Serb graves as well.

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.

"Did you forget about him?
(Peggy, 20 May 2015 14:36)"

Oric was acquitted for war crimes, so your only left with typical conspiracy theories of anti-Serb bias and/or propaganda.

Those killed were killed in combat and not in some concentration camp. Do you not see the difference?
(Peggy, 20 May 2015 14:36)

It would be more like the Katyn massacre than Hitlers camps. They were not killed in combat. It was the organised execution of about 8000 unarmed prisoners. These people were murdered and the bodies bulldozed into large pits.
Yes they let the women go, many of them were raped first.

It would be like the German president suggesting the Polish president to visit graves of killed German soldiers as well when going to Auschwitz to commemorate the holocaust. This president is a shame.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 12:40)

Unless these Serbs actually took part in killing Bosnians, this is a poor comparison. You're almost always on the mark with your comments, but this time you're just plain wrong.

Good, because we don't want him and the other chetnik fascists to come...

From Rocky: "the same Vojislav that sent many of his own paramilitary units to participate in that evil deed!"

Hey Rocky - Is this the same Vojislav Sesilj who was on trial for 11 years and not convicted of anything?

Perhaps you have some evidence that didn't make it to the Hague. Why don't you testify since you seem to be sure that he is guilty of war crimes. Cowards like you never come forward though, they just blow smoke annonomously from behind your keybord.

Just like he had to "travel" to Moscow when Edi Rama visited Belgrade (and he ended up watching him from his TV). This guy is a shameless coward...

"Unless these Serbs actually took part in killing Bosnians, this is a poor comparison. You're almost always on the mark with your comments, but this time you're just plain wrong."
(Balkan Anthropologist, 20 May 2015 16:58)

Why? The Srebrenica massacre commemoration is not like laying wrests for killed soldiers, but to commemorate victims of the worst massacre in Europe since WW2 - so I still think it's comparable.

And it's not a good sign not to attend. It says a lot that Tadic was the last high official of Serbia that participated in that commemoration.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.

He won't go to Srebrenica, but he'll go to Moscow?

Why? The Srebrenica massacre commemoration is not like laying wrests for killed soldiers, but to commemorate victims of the worst massacre in Europe since WW2 - so I still think it's comparable.

And it's not a good sign not to attend. It says a lot that Tadic was the last high official of Serbia that participated in that commemoration.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)
==========================================
Are you actually saying that these males were civilians?
Don't forget that Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks. So much evidence out there proving that. So to kill the people who were murdering Serbs in surrounding villages is not a crime? We should be commemorating that?
Are any Bosniaks going to commemorate the deaths of thousands of Serbs at the hands of thse "innocent civilians" (women and children included) in that area? If not, why not? Didn't happen?

Oric was acquitted for war crimes, so your only left with typical conspiracy theories of anti-Serb bias and/or propaganda.
(LK, 20 May 2015 15:52)
==================
Sure, just live Gotovina was innocent.

Are you actually saying that these males were civilians?
Don't forget that Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks. So much evidence out there proving that. So to kill the people who were murdering Serbs in surrounding villages is not a crime? We should be commemorating that?
(Peggy, 21 May 2015 01:22)

But did those specific 13/14 year old boys who were executed actually attack or kill anybody?!!! According to your logic above, every Muslim boy alive should be mssacred, because there is evidence that "Muslims use boys as young as 13 or 14 to carry out attacks"!!!!!!!!!!

And, even if they did, you still don't execute a 13/14 year old boy!!! To be honest mate, I think it's very useful to have you write stuff like the above - there is no better way to discredit what some monsters did in the name of Serbs then reading your sickening comments trying to justify a massacre of 13/14 year old boys in the middle of Europe at the end of the 20th century!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S. In case you did not notice, I did not say "what Serbs did", because I'm sure that the vast majority of Serbs are not monsters to massacre 13/14 year old boys, regardless of what they might have done, if they had done anything at all.

Serbia's where swell killed in 1993 which cause fighting I'm that area ,which resulted from winning in 1992 to defaet in 1995 . What comes around goes around ,get it Muslim's.

How Kitarovic of him to miss the commemoration.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)
I have searched through a lot on google and very interested in where you found an official report of the youngest being 13-14. I did find claims of children as young as 5. I was going to keep digging and thought the easiest way would be to ask for your sources.

After reading all the comments I could only come to one conclusion and that is anyone who defends the actions at Srebrenica whether male or female have as much blood on their hands as the men issueing the orders and those who fired the shots. But what is worse is that they live in other countries such as Australia and they and their offspring will infect the areas with their vile hatred for many many years.

And I don't comment to Peggy who seems to think that all male people must be killed because they could be fighters. P.S: The youngest male killed by Mladic's butchers was 13 or 14 years old.
(Comm. Parrisson, 20 May 2015 19:50)

Of course, 13/14 years old could have posed a risk of attacking a Serb when they grew up... Since Serbs are God's chosen, anybody who might even remotely even thing to threaten their security must be anihilited, even if 13/14 years old!