Draft resolution on "genocide" in Kosovo assembly

Listen up Serbs, we don't give a damn whether Serbs want to participate in Kosovas assembly or not. Srpska lost does not even make a difference so get that through your head.
Secondly, Serbia made made genocide happen in Kosova in the name of greater Serbia, so don't try to draw attention involving a special court. Kosovas assembky will pass whatever resolution is necessary whether Srpska list likes it or not.
Srpska list is there just to be there and collect their paycheck, they know damn well they have no credebility.

Might as well try to get this passed before a good portion of Kosovo's top leadership are indicted for war crimes.

This proposed lawsuit is actually quite serious, and it is long overdue. There will be much more to come, so b92 needs to stay tuned...

Srpska list is there just to be there and collect their paycheck, they know damn well they have no credebility.
(Albanian, 3 April 2015 16:12)

So in other words, they're like every other MP in the Kosovo parliament. For a minute there, I thought you were trying to suggest they were somehow unique to Kosovo's internationally controlled political system. Good thing I read your comment all the way to the end.

Serbia seems very afraid of this bill.
"That's a pamphlet - third year law students learn that only a state can be a party in front of the International Court of Justice, and Kosovo is neither a state, nor a UN member."
I remember Serbia tried to prove, in the ICJ, that Kosovo broke international law by declaring independence.
BTW the ICJ sided with Kosovo in saying independence was legal, so it does not contridict 1244.
No wonder Serbia does not want to go to court, the hague is full of Serb criminals, Serbia knows that they can't win in any court. They should be scared.
Kosovo shows evidence, Serbia only has accusations. Like with Hajradinaj, how many trials does the former PM of Kosovo need before Serbs accept that he is innocent? They make up new claims about Thaci, they can't even get a trial. It's pathetic. No wonder no one takes Serbia serious any more, they're all talk and no proof.

Oh no, not once again: Wrong! The ICJ ruled the DECLARATION of independence was legal, and the (only) reason why it doesn't contradict UN1244 was that it was made by so-called 'people of Kosovo' and not by officials of the then Kosovo interim government (who would have violated UN1244 by doing so)
(Comm. Parrisson, 6 April 2015 20:39)

C.P,
It is interesting, like all Serbian outhouse lawyers, you are playing with words, yet in the end you agree that the declaration of independence does not violate 1244. If Serbia really believes Kosovo is not independent, why not go back to the ICJ and ask the appropriate question. However, we all know Serbia is not willing to take the risk of looking foolish yet again. Or, could it be that Serbia can't afford the legal fees. For that matter, your Russian buddies can't help either since they are also broke.

The word genocide here is used as a political tool - it feels very separate from the actual sufferings of actual people.

Grubby political plays should not be associated with the issues of murder - for that the police and judiciary should be at work.

Using the word genocide for 'yar boo- sucks' divisive politics is wrong. If they are really interested in the issues of death and suffering, stop trying to force the word genocide (which is of debatable usage in this context anyway) and instead deal directly with the word murder if or when it applies.

The word genocide here is used as a political tool - it feels very separate from the actual sufferings of actual people.

Grubby political plays should not be associated with the issues of murder - for that the police and judiciary should be at work.

Using the word genocide for 'yar boo- sucks' divisive politics is wrong. If they are really interested in the issues of death and suffering, stop trying to force the word genocide (which is of debatable usage in this context anyway) and instead deal directly with the word murder if or when it applies.
(Bob, 4 April 2015 04:40)

I agree with this. Instead, the Hague's Tribunal mission should have been extended. There's still people that need to face justice; international justice. Once that's done, then sue for property damages if there is a case for that. This lawsuit is not going to achieve anything other than politicians acting like they're doing something.

"BTW the ICJ sided with Kosovo in saying independence was legal, so it does not contridict 1244. "
(Valon, 5 April 2015 14:38)

Oh no, not once again: Wrong! The ICJ ruled the DECLARATION of independence was legal, and the (only) reason why it doesn't contradict UN1244 was that it was made by so-called 'people of Kosovo' and not by officials of the then Kosovo interim government (who would have violated UN1244 by doing so)

Might as well try to get this passed before a good portion of Kosovo's top leadership are indicted for war crimes.

Srpska list is there just to be there and collect their paycheck, they know damn well they have no credebility.
(Albanian, 3 April 2015 16:12)

So in other words, they're like every other MP in the Kosovo parliament. For a minute there, I thought you were trying to suggest they were somehow unique to Kosovo's internationally controlled political system. Good thing I read your comment all the way to the end.

Listen up Serbs, we don't give a damn whether Serbs want to participate in Kosovas assembly or not. Srpska lost does not even make a difference so get that through your head.
Secondly, Serbia made made genocide happen in Kosova in the name of greater Serbia, so don't try to draw attention involving a special court. Kosovas assembky will pass whatever resolution is necessary whether Srpska list likes it or not.
Srpska list is there just to be there and collect their paycheck, they know damn well they have no credebility.

The word genocide here is used as a political tool - it feels very separate from the actual sufferings of actual people.

Grubby political plays should not be associated with the issues of murder - for that the police and judiciary should be at work.

Using the word genocide for 'yar boo- sucks' divisive politics is wrong. If they are really interested in the issues of death and suffering, stop trying to force the word genocide (which is of debatable usage in this context anyway) and instead deal directly with the word murder if or when it applies.

This proposed lawsuit is actually quite serious, and it is long overdue. There will be much more to come, so b92 needs to stay tuned...

"BTW the ICJ sided with Kosovo in saying independence was legal, so it does not contridict 1244. "
(Valon, 5 April 2015 14:38)

Oh no, not once again: Wrong! The ICJ ruled the DECLARATION of independence was legal, and the (only) reason why it doesn't contradict UN1244 was that it was made by so-called 'people of Kosovo' and not by officials of the then Kosovo interim government (who would have violated UN1244 by doing so)

The word genocide here is used as a political tool - it feels very separate from the actual sufferings of actual people.

Grubby political plays should not be associated with the issues of murder - for that the police and judiciary should be at work.

Using the word genocide for 'yar boo- sucks' divisive politics is wrong. If they are really interested in the issues of death and suffering, stop trying to force the word genocide (which is of debatable usage in this context anyway) and instead deal directly with the word murder if or when it applies.
(Bob, 4 April 2015 04:40)

I agree with this. Instead, the Hague's Tribunal mission should have been extended. There's still people that need to face justice; international justice. Once that's done, then sue for property damages if there is a case for that. This lawsuit is not going to achieve anything other than politicians acting like they're doing something.

Serbia seems very afraid of this bill.
"That's a pamphlet - third year law students learn that only a state can be a party in front of the International Court of Justice, and Kosovo is neither a state, nor a UN member."
I remember Serbia tried to prove, in the ICJ, that Kosovo broke international law by declaring independence.
BTW the ICJ sided with Kosovo in saying independence was legal, so it does not contridict 1244.
No wonder Serbia does not want to go to court, the hague is full of Serb criminals, Serbia knows that they can't win in any court. They should be scared.
Kosovo shows evidence, Serbia only has accusations. Like with Hajradinaj, how many trials does the former PM of Kosovo need before Serbs accept that he is innocent? They make up new claims about Thaci, they can't even get a trial. It's pathetic. No wonder no one takes Serbia serious any more, they're all talk and no proof.

Oh no, not once again: Wrong! The ICJ ruled the DECLARATION of independence was legal, and the (only) reason why it doesn't contradict UN1244 was that it was made by so-called 'people of Kosovo' and not by officials of the then Kosovo interim government (who would have violated UN1244 by doing so)
(Comm. Parrisson, 6 April 2015 20:39)

C.P,
It is interesting, like all Serbian outhouse lawyers, you are playing with words, yet in the end you agree that the declaration of independence does not violate 1244. If Serbia really believes Kosovo is not independent, why not go back to the ICJ and ask the appropriate question. However, we all know Serbia is not willing to take the risk of looking foolish yet again. Or, could it be that Serbia can't afford the legal fees. For that matter, your Russian buddies can't help either since they are also broke.