Željka Cvijanović has said that any possible changes in Bosnia-Herzegovina "must be the result of an agreement between the three peoples and two entities."
"Changes in Bosnia only if all sides agree" = no changes. RS won't agree to a single country, Federation won't agree to separation and the Muslims and Serbs won't agree to a Croat entity; next discussion?
Yes Bader Bos Serbs are part of the country and as such need to support the progress of the country they have been part of. Time for reform; electoral, constitutional, administrative, political, financial. Enough of the rot.
Why should the Serbian entity have any say or oppinion,
in a croatian indipendence or separation from Bosnia-Herzegovina ?
==============================
Didn't Croatia say they will defend Bosnia if Serbs tried to split?
Why should they have any say?
They have even less say because they are not within border of Bosnia.
Arn: Yes you have misunderstood. They're referring to the creation of a third entiry, such as Republika Srpska and the Federation, withing BiH. Not the secession of the Croats from the country.
I suppose the closest thing in Sweden to the different constitutional people in BiH is the Sami people (Samer), all though they're a self-governing minority and the constitutional people in BiH live on different terms as specified by the Dayton agreement. The difference is that Serbs aren't a minority in BiH they've lived there since the creation of the country and by constituional law have the same rights as the other 2 ethnicities.
The post-war Bosnia is made up of the RS and the Muslim-Croat entity, the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina (FBiH). Asked what stance she would take in the event a separate Croat entity were formed, Cvijanović stressed that "any changes, especially constitutional changes" must be the result of an agreement between the three peoples and two entities, "and cannot happen at the expense of the interests of the RS."
Comment - "In the event a separate croat entity where formed".
Arn: Yes you have misunderstood. They're referring to the creation of a third entiry, such as Republika Srpska and the Federation, withing BiH. Not the secession of the Croats from the country.
I suppose the closest thing in Sweden to the different constitutional people in BiH is the Sami people (Samer), all though they're a self-governing minority and the constitutional people in BiH live on different terms as specified by the Dayton agreement. The difference is that Serbs aren't a minority in BiH they've lived there since the creation of the country and by constituional law have the same rights as the other 2 ethnicities.
Yes Bader Bos Serbs are part of the country and as such need to support the progress of the country they have been part of. Time for reform; electoral, constitutional, administrative, political, financial. Enough of the rot.
The post-war Bosnia is made up of the RS and the Muslim-Croat entity, the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina (FBiH). Asked what stance she would take in the event a separate Croat entity were formed, Cvijanović stressed that "any changes, especially constitutional changes" must be the result of an agreement between the three peoples and two entities, "and cannot happen at the expense of the interests of the RS."
Comment - "In the event a separate croat entity where formed".
"Changes in Bosnia only if all sides agree" = no changes. RS won't agree to a single country, Federation won't agree to separation and the Muslims and Serbs won't agree to a Croat entity; next discussion?
Why should the Serbian entity have any say or oppinion,
in a croatian indipendence or separation from Bosnia-Herzegovina ?
==============================
Didn't Croatia say they will defend Bosnia if Serbs tried to split?
Why should they have any say?
They have even less say because they are not within border of Bosnia.
Arn: Yes you have misunderstood. They're referring to the creation of a third entiry, such as Republika Srpska and the Federation, withing BiH. Not the secession of the Croats from the country.
I suppose the closest thing in Sweden to the different constitutional people in BiH is the Sami people (Samer), all though they're a self-governing minority and the constitutional people in BiH live on different terms as specified by the Dayton agreement. The difference is that Serbs aren't a minority in BiH they've lived there since the creation of the country and by constituional law have the same rights as the other 2 ethnicities.
Why should the Serbian entity have any say or oppinion,
in a croatian indipendence or separation from Bosnia-Herzegovina ?
==============================
Didn't Croatia say they will defend Bosnia if Serbs tried to split?
Why should they have any say?
They have even less say because they are not within border of Bosnia.
The post-war Bosnia is made up of the RS and the Muslim-Croat entity, the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina (FBiH). Asked what stance she would take in the event a separate Croat entity were formed, Cvijanović stressed that "any changes, especially constitutional changes" must be the result of an agreement between the three peoples and two entities, "and cannot happen at the expense of the interests of the RS."
Comment - "In the event a separate croat entity where formed".
Yes Bader Bos Serbs are part of the country and as such need to support the progress of the country they have been part of. Time for reform; electoral, constitutional, administrative, political, financial. Enough of the rot.
"Changes in Bosnia only if all sides agree" = no changes. RS won't agree to a single country, Federation won't agree to separation and the Muslims and Serbs won't agree to a Croat entity; next discussion?
IMAGE SOURCE
8 Komentari
Sortiraj po: