Skifteri
pre 11 godina
First of all, both American Indians and Aborigines were documented as being on the land when explorers arrived. Albanians were not documented anywhere.
Second, they do have physical proof of being there before the white man. There are cave paintings at least, what do the Albanians have? Zilch, nothing.
C'mon, give us something, anything. A cave painting will do.
(Peggy, 13 February 2013 00:39)
_______________________________________________________________________
Yes, Albanians are indeed mentioned by the Romans in 150AD. That still 3 and a 1/2 centuries before Barbarian, than slav invasions. (Look up Albani tribe) Albanopolis is mentioned way before that by Ptoleme.
You'd have to study the evidence and form on indirect theory since no direct evidance exists. The absence of Illyrian cultural monumenst/documents is also charateristic of Albanians which did not have a writing system since the 19th century. No migration exists. No relative of Shqip language can be found.
Since you what a tangible proof, we can conclude that Albanians are living artifacts of Illyrians.
96 Komentari
Sortiraj po: