icj1
pre 11 godina
You have a learning disability.
(Peggy, 1 August 2012 12:34)
You are absolutely correct dear. I've a disability in seeing things that never happened - like the UNSC voting to reject the A plan.
----------
The reason the A plan was never debated was because it NEVER HAD A CHANCE of passing.
(Peggy, 1 August 2012 12:34)
And I say that you are wrong and you don’t have any evidence (i.e. UNSC vote) that the Ahtisaari plan “never had a change of passing” other then hypothetical scenarios of ifs and thens. Unless, of course, the UN Charter grants to Peggy the right to veto UNSC resolutions, in which case you are correct.
----------
So there was no need to even bring it up.
(Peggy, 1 August 2012 12:34)
Absolutely correct because as already explained with legal evidence, under the terms of UNSCR 1244 the Security Council did not reserve for itself the final determination of the situation in Kosovo.
----------
What is the difference between never debating the plan because it never had a chance of passing or debating it and not passing it? The second one is slightly better because at least there was a chance. In this case option 1 was taken which is far worse for Mr Athisaari.
(Peggy, 1 August 2012 12:34)
I’m not sure why you are asking the above to me… I never said anything about the difference or lack thereof for the things you mentioned. But feel free to provide answers to your own questions :). So can you please stop with making a fool of yourself.
30 Komentari
Sortiraj po: