Complaint against massacre case decision

The Bosnian Prospectors conclusion that this was a "legitimate military target" is perfect. The RS Serbs should use this same defense over Srebrenica, which was an armed camp from which numerous raids were conducted against Serbian civilians. Funny how when a Serb is murdered or killed, its always "legitimate" But when a Croat or Muslim is killed, its a war crime.

The ICTY, the Austrians, the UK and now the BIH legal system all dismissed this as not a war crime. While the entire world recognizes Srebrenica as a genocide. Why is that? well the JNA being a foreign power on Bosnian territory makes it a legitimate target of attack. Why is Srebrenica different? because their were thousands of civilians in Srebrenica that were systematically murdered or deported in hopes of creating ethnically clean Serbian land. Terrible reasoning from a intellectual light weight like Michael doesn't make this equal one bit of the killing of 6 JNA soldiers who were there to lay siege of Sarajevo which lost 10,000 people. Again the only thing Dobrovoljacka proves is that a foreign force was in Bosnia and this is really bad for Serbia as it recognizes that this is not a civil war but a international conflict.

@What? As I remember JNA was in Bosnia to fight terrorists which Alija brought from Middle East. JNA was legit army in Yugoslavia and B&H was Yugoslavia until Alija wanted independent Bosnia-even if as big as "baking pan", or did you conveniently forgotten all that. By agreement, army was retreating and not attacking anybody when your "innocent" friends killed them. By the way, there are too many unanswered question about Srebrenica as who, how and how many.

The convoy was not a legitimate military target since an agreement was made to allow them to retreat. That agreement was violated. Therefore, this is a warcrime.

The JNA can hardly be considered a foreign force considering it was in what was until a few weeks earlier its own country. Bosnia may have declared its independence, but it obviously had to allow the JNA a reasonable amount of time to withdraw.

For example Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania became independent in 1991, but Soviet/Russian stayed until 1994.

Attacking an army that is out of combat is against article 3 of the 3rd Geneva Convention.

"What?" appears to be the intellectual flyweight here.

The ICTY, the Austrians, the UK and now the BIH legal system all dismissed this as not a war crime. While the entire world recognizes Srebrenica as a genocide. Why is that? well the JNA being a foreign power on Bosnian territory makes it a legitimate target of attack. Why is Srebrenica different? because their were thousands of civilians in Srebrenica that were systematically murdered or deported in hopes of creating ethnically clean Serbian land. Terrible reasoning from a intellectual light weight like Michael doesn't make this equal one bit of the killing of 6 JNA soldiers who were there to lay siege of Sarajevo which lost 10,000 people. Again the only thing Dobrovoljacka proves is that a foreign force was in Bosnia and this is really bad for Serbia as it recognizes that this is not a civil war but a international conflict.

@What? As I remember JNA was in Bosnia to fight terrorists which Alija brought from Middle East. JNA was legit army in Yugoslavia and B&H was Yugoslavia until Alija wanted independent Bosnia-even if as big as "baking pan", or did you conveniently forgotten all that. By agreement, army was retreating and not attacking anybody when your "innocent" friends killed them. By the way, there are too many unanswered question about Srebrenica as who, how and how many.

The Bosnian Prospectors conclusion that this was a "legitimate military target" is perfect. The RS Serbs should use this same defense over Srebrenica, which was an armed camp from which numerous raids were conducted against Serbian civilians. Funny how when a Serb is murdered or killed, its always "legitimate" But when a Croat or Muslim is killed, its a war crime.

The convoy was not a legitimate military target since an agreement was made to allow them to retreat. That agreement was violated. Therefore, this is a warcrime.

The JNA can hardly be considered a foreign force considering it was in what was until a few weeks earlier its own country. Bosnia may have declared its independence, but it obviously had to allow the JNA a reasonable amount of time to withdraw.

For example Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania became independent in 1991, but Soviet/Russian stayed until 1994.

Attacking an army that is out of combat is against article 3 of the 3rd Geneva Convention.

"What?" appears to be the intellectual flyweight here.