DimTuc
pre 18 godina
Pity about all the attacks on Acko, I guess some Serbs simply can't imagine that some other Serbs might think all the bluster about continuing to rule Kosova is a waste of time and energy for Serbia and does nothing to help (the contrary in fact) the K Serbs. Get real guys; there are Israelis who support self-determination for Palestine, there are Americans who oppose the occupation of Iraq and there are Serbs who oppose the reoccupation of Kosova. It is actually a mark of a relatively civilised society.
Second, we read "How can I trust NATO or KFOR for that matter after event in March 2004. How KFOR can be trusted when they are incapable of protecting small Serbian community from the assaults that happen on the daily basis."
Well I'm no fan of the idea that foreign armies or protectorates are the way to go anywhere, let alone that they should be "trusted," but in the circumstances you can offer no alternative. Why spice it up by talking about "daily" attacks when you know the frequency is nothing remotely like that. Yes a lack of security continues, and needs to be addressed, but no there are not anything like "daily" attacks and in many areas there is relative normality (and in others still appalling situations, eg Orachovac). It is a process of re-building bridges which can not be rebuilt as long as Serbia, and some minority leaders, continue to insist that the majority be stuffed back under Serb rule.
As for march 2004, yes NATO performed poorly re protecting property, but in reality put protecting lives ahead of protecting property: of 19 killed, 8 tragically were Serbs, while the other 11 were Albanians shot dead by NATO troops while trying to attack Serbs. Thus Acko is right that Kfor has done "something" (not enough) to protect K Serbs while Serbia has done nothing (but make it worse for them).
Finally, the Serb posters saying that Kfor troops should leave if the country they comes from recognises unilateral declaration of independence. I'm afraid this merely shows your callousness towards the Serb minority. The Albanians do not need NATO there, much as they may love NATO; NATO troops are there primarily to protect the K Serbs from the unfortunate extremist streak that continues exist among pockets of Albanians. And tensions will most likely be hightened by a unilateral declaration by Pristina, and a similar unilateral declaration by north Mitrovica. Do you really want no, or reduced, Kfor troops to protect the smaller Serb enclaves in such a situation? Or do you imagine the Serbian army swarming through 2 million Albanians to reach Gracanica?
23 Komentari
Sortiraj po: