Peter Sudyka
pre 16 godina
"I fail to see what Serbia is bargaining. They offered more than autonomy and less than independence. This is what they are trumpeting as a compromise. I fail to see where the bargain is since they want to get exactly what they offer. I fail to also see the bargain because for all practical purposes Kosova/o is now functioning as an independent state, supervised by the UN. This is exactly how they want to be internationally recognized but with EU replacing the UN. Under the Serb plan Kosova/o will not be practically independent but dependent on Serbia. Kosova/o under the Serbian plan will lose a lot of the privileges it has now. I fail to see were the bargain comes from the Serbian side.
How can you call the Serbian plan a bargain when what it is offering is less than what Kosova/o already has.
You cannot call a bargain a status based on an inequality of less then or more then ( the less and the more depending on Belgrade's wishes). Nobody in their right mind would base their future and their children's future on an inequality.
(johny, 26. September 2007 06:25)"
The only thing that I am saying is that Serbia is at least trying to propose something different from their initial stand, whilst the Kosovo Albanians are not being flexible at all.
The fundamental, underlining question is how both sides accept the outcome on December the 10th. An outcome favoring the one side will more than likely cause an unfavorable reaction from the other.
And that is a fact!
There has to be an outcome that will not cause a negative reaction from either side... except one where both lose something, and both win something.
I am a Pan-Europeanist and I do not wish for either people to suffer. It may seem like stupid blabbering from a neutral party for someone who lives there, but it is the only way for peace! I think that the US and Russia should have no say in this matter at all!
26 Komentari
Sortiraj po: