Matthew
pre 18 godina
As a member of the nobility whose family had all our property taken by the communists I actually support retaining the communist symbols as a part of the building's history. Its easy enough to remove them sometime in the future if needed, but you can never put them back once they're gone. It represents our history, and that is what it is. I personally do not agree with destroying monuments of previous ruling classes. Too much history has been lost in the past to that kind of thinking. The Library of Alexandria is the most extreme example of this kind of action.
"not as if there is much difference between Nazism and Communism, with oppression of people, specific economic models, and GULAG's/prisons/camps for so many of the dissidents and/or innocents"
However, I am going to have to disagree a bit with Stevo and some of the others here. Yes, Stalin's version of Communism was incredibly brutal, probably even worse in many ways to the Nazi's. However, while I don't agree with a lot of Tito's policies, he wasn't a monster on the level of Stalin or Hitler. Yes, he did commit some horrible crimes, but his victims do not number in the 10's of millions like Stalin or Hitler.
Like it or not, life under Tito for the average Yugoslav was a sort of Golden Age for our people. In no other period of our history was the standard of living so good.
15 Komentari
Sortiraj po: