"We tested the S-400, US threats are not important"

You have right? No you do not.
But you are the cheeky bastard that no one so far did not found an answer for.
No right to be in Libya, Syria, Greece and other countries either.
You, yourself only give such a right.
Timeyou are stopped in tracks.

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.
(Dan Waller, 23 October 2020 17:36)

Where did you get this piece of BS from? You posterior? Then why are the US and Israel against the Russians selling Iran the S400 if the superior US weaponry can take down anything the Russians have?
If you had a brain you would be dangerous.

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.
(Dan Waller, 23 October 2020 17:36)

dan walleraj - lol, sure, what ever you say, homer. Moscow would love an opportunity to be test that "confidence", LOL

How do idiots like you even come up with this stuff??

(Dan Waller, 25 October 2020 05:51)
Listen carefully dopey. I post only as sj not under any other name. I am not an Albo to hide under dozens of false flags.
You have no clues what you’re talking about so if I was you, I'd avoid posting otherwise you look like a fool, especially when talking about the S400. But out of sear amusement what weaponry does the US have that will go through “Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.”
Perhaps the Patriot system that is only 40% effective under war conditions? You remember the Saudis have lots of Patriots and yet the Houthis from Yemen (fairly primitive people) managed to send drones and partially destroyed Saudi’s largest oil refinery without being detected.
Or maybe the cruise missiles? The ones that were last fired in Syria where of the 52 launched 10 never made it to land; 18 exploded nowhere near the target and 5 just dropped out of the sky? Total cost was $78 million. Are these the weaponry your talking about?

Maybe Erdogan can get to work in eastern Kazakhstan to free the Uighars in neighboring China.

Watcher aka sj,
Can’t you do better in trying not to sound like sj. Most people have known for a long time that you are one and the same person
Everyone that opposes your ideas makes you think they are Albanian.
Peace to all.

Serbs. Do you remember how the albanians kept on yelling to me when I said that Kosovo cannot be independent even if Serbia said yes. You remember?
Well, here is what their own Specialist say about this:
” UN Day, Kosovo in an unfavorable position, without hope for membership (Lajmi)

European integration expert and professor Avni Mazreku said in an interview with the news website that Kosovo’s current relations with the United Nations is unfavorable because of UNSC Resolution 1244.
“Kosovo’s relations with the UN continues to be quite unfavorable as long as Resolution 1244 which recognises Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo is in force. Unfortunately, even though there were special envoys form the United Nations to resolve Kosovo’s status since 2007, namely Ahtisaari, he suggested a new resolution of the Security Council which would replace Resolution 1244. But this was never achieved because of lack of consensus among the permanent member states of the Security Council,” he said.
From the UN standpoint, Kosovo is still treated according to Resolution 1244 as part of Serbia and this puts Kosovo in an unfavorable position and because of this Kosovo must report every three months to the Security Council forever. Kosovo does not have a favorable legal position as long as Resolution 1244 remains in force and is almost impossible to take away”.
Mazreku also said Kosovo has minimal chances of becoming a member of the United Nations.”

(Dan W., 26 October 2020 07:29)
If the US had those modern offensive weapons, they would have used them by now in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. Or do you think the US would not have used them for fear of killing innocent civilians perhaps?
Magazines like Janes weekly are propaganda – they even talk about the high capabilities of the UK military too LOL. What did Janes say about the F35 five years ago? It was the best jet in the world to replace the F22 raptor, and the Russians will have nothing like it for decades. What does it say now?
Most publications now talk about the superiority of the F22 and how that’s the best in the world; no talk about the “technologically” superior F35.
It’s got to the point where anything written by western sources should be treated as BS unless proven otherwise.
Stop reading too much Janes and start thinking.

(Dan W., 26 October 2020 07:29)
If the US had those modern offensive weapons, they would have used them by now in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. Or do you think the US would not have used them for fear of killing innocent civilians perhaps?
Magazines like Janes weekly are propaganda – they even talk about the high capabilities of the UK military too LOL. What did Janes say about the F35 five years ago? It was the best jet in the world to replace the F22 raptor, and the Russians will have nothing like it for decades. What does it say now?
Most publications now talk about the superiority of the F22 and how that’s the best in the world; no talk about the “technologically” superior F35.
It’s got to the point where anything written by western sources should be treated as BS unless proven otherwise.
Stop reading too much Janes and start thinking.

sj,
The Russian S400 is a defensive weapon. Obviously the U.S. is not concerned with taking them down. The point is the S400 is not capable of defending against modern U.S. offensive weapons. You need to start reading Jane’s Weekly.

sj,
Does your statement referring to BS, if not proven otherwise, apply to all your unproven statements as well.

(Dan Waller, 28 October 2020 02:08)

Naturally someone like you would think that the US is so powerful no nation on earth can stand in its way LOL.
The F35 is fact. They have spent a trillion dollars on this albatross and it still has serious problems. Google it yourself; even the New York Times has written about it. Lad, if US Defence News talks about this then you know it’s bad.
Yes, the F35 was supposed to replace the F22 Raptor.
Australia is one country that has been paying to develop that jet and to date only 2 have been delivered and so far, they only do flyovers on special occasions.
That’s the problem with people like yourself, you can’t get your point across because you have little to no knowledge so you rely on Janes weekly to tell you all about the superiority of US weaponry. The sad part is that the US would have used these superior weapons in Afghanistan, Iraq etc, but they have not because they don’t have them. It’s called spin.
Wars like Afghanistan and Iraq is where you test new weaponry.

(Dan Waller, 28 October 2020 02:08)

Naturally someone like you would think that the US is so powerful no nation on earth can stand in its way LOL.
The F35 is fact. They have spent a trillion dollars on this albatross and it still has serious problems. Google it yourself; even the New York Times has written about it. Lad, if US Defence News talks about this then you know it’s bad.
Yes, the F35 was supposed to replace the F22 Raptor.
Australia is one country that has been paying to develop that jet and to date only 2 have been delivered and so far, they only do flyovers on special occasions.
That’s the problem with people like yourself, you can’t get your point across because you have little to no knowledge so you rely on Janes weekly to tell you all about the superiority of US weaponry. The sad part is that the US would have used these superior weapons in Afghanistan, Iraq etc, but they have not because they don’t have them. It’s called spin.
Wars like Afghanistan and Iraq is where you test new weaponry.

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.

You have right? No you do not.
But you are the cheeky bastard that no one so far did not found an answer for.
No right to be in Libya, Syria, Greece and other countries either.
You, yourself only give such a right.
Timeyou are stopped in tracks.

Watcher aka sj,
Can’t you do better in trying not to sound like sj. Most people have known for a long time that you are one and the same person
Everyone that opposes your ideas makes you think they are Albanian.
Peace to all.

sj,
The Russian S400 is a defensive weapon. Obviously the U.S. is not concerned with taking them down. The point is the S400 is not capable of defending against modern U.S. offensive weapons. You need to start reading Jane’s Weekly.

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.
(Dan Waller, 23 October 2020 17:36)

dan walleraj - lol, sure, what ever you say, homer. Moscow would love an opportunity to be test that "confidence", LOL

How do idiots like you even come up with this stuff??

The U.S. has also tested the S-400 against its weapons and is confident Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.
(Dan Waller, 23 October 2020 17:36)

Where did you get this piece of BS from? You posterior? Then why are the US and Israel against the Russians selling Iran the S400 if the superior US weaponry can take down anything the Russians have?
If you had a brain you would be dangerous.

Maybe Erdogan can get to work in eastern Kazakhstan to free the Uighars in neighboring China.

(Dan Waller, 25 October 2020 05:51)
Listen carefully dopey. I post only as sj not under any other name. I am not an Albo to hide under dozens of false flags.
You have no clues what you’re talking about so if I was you, I'd avoid posting otherwise you look like a fool, especially when talking about the S400. But out of sear amusement what weaponry does the US have that will go through “Russia’s defenses are like Swiss cheese.”
Perhaps the Patriot system that is only 40% effective under war conditions? You remember the Saudis have lots of Patriots and yet the Houthis from Yemen (fairly primitive people) managed to send drones and partially destroyed Saudi’s largest oil refinery without being detected.
Or maybe the cruise missiles? The ones that were last fired in Syria where of the 52 launched 10 never made it to land; 18 exploded nowhere near the target and 5 just dropped out of the sky? Total cost was $78 million. Are these the weaponry your talking about?

(Dan Waller, 28 October 2020 02:08)

Naturally someone like you would think that the US is so powerful no nation on earth can stand in its way LOL.
The F35 is fact. They have spent a trillion dollars on this albatross and it still has serious problems. Google it yourself; even the New York Times has written about it. Lad, if US Defence News talks about this then you know it’s bad.
Yes, the F35 was supposed to replace the F22 Raptor.
Australia is one country that has been paying to develop that jet and to date only 2 have been delivered and so far, they only do flyovers on special occasions.
That’s the problem with people like yourself, you can’t get your point across because you have little to no knowledge so you rely on Janes weekly to tell you all about the superiority of US weaponry. The sad part is that the US would have used these superior weapons in Afghanistan, Iraq etc, but they have not because they don’t have them. It’s called spin.
Wars like Afghanistan and Iraq is where you test new weaponry.

Serbs. Do you remember how the albanians kept on yelling to me when I said that Kosovo cannot be independent even if Serbia said yes. You remember?
Well, here is what their own Specialist say about this:
” UN Day, Kosovo in an unfavorable position, without hope for membership (Lajmi)

European integration expert and professor Avni Mazreku said in an interview with the news website that Kosovo’s current relations with the United Nations is unfavorable because of UNSC Resolution 1244.
“Kosovo’s relations with the UN continues to be quite unfavorable as long as Resolution 1244 which recognises Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo is in force. Unfortunately, even though there were special envoys form the United Nations to resolve Kosovo’s status since 2007, namely Ahtisaari, he suggested a new resolution of the Security Council which would replace Resolution 1244. But this was never achieved because of lack of consensus among the permanent member states of the Security Council,” he said.
From the UN standpoint, Kosovo is still treated according to Resolution 1244 as part of Serbia and this puts Kosovo in an unfavorable position and because of this Kosovo must report every three months to the Security Council forever. Kosovo does not have a favorable legal position as long as Resolution 1244 remains in force and is almost impossible to take away”.
Mazreku also said Kosovo has minimal chances of becoming a member of the United Nations.”

(Dan W., 26 October 2020 07:29)
If the US had those modern offensive weapons, they would have used them by now in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. Or do you think the US would not have used them for fear of killing innocent civilians perhaps?
Magazines like Janes weekly are propaganda – they even talk about the high capabilities of the UK military too LOL. What did Janes say about the F35 five years ago? It was the best jet in the world to replace the F22 raptor, and the Russians will have nothing like it for decades. What does it say now?
Most publications now talk about the superiority of the F22 and how that’s the best in the world; no talk about the “technologically” superior F35.
It’s got to the point where anything written by western sources should be treated as BS unless proven otherwise.
Stop reading too much Janes and start thinking.

(Dan W., 26 October 2020 07:29)
If the US had those modern offensive weapons, they would have used them by now in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. Or do you think the US would not have used them for fear of killing innocent civilians perhaps?
Magazines like Janes weekly are propaganda – they even talk about the high capabilities of the UK military too LOL. What did Janes say about the F35 five years ago? It was the best jet in the world to replace the F22 raptor, and the Russians will have nothing like it for decades. What does it say now?
Most publications now talk about the superiority of the F22 and how that’s the best in the world; no talk about the “technologically” superior F35.
It’s got to the point where anything written by western sources should be treated as BS unless proven otherwise.
Stop reading too much Janes and start thinking.

sj,
Does your statement referring to BS, if not proven otherwise, apply to all your unproven statements as well.

(Dan Waller, 28 October 2020 02:08)

Naturally someone like you would think that the US is so powerful no nation on earth can stand in its way LOL.
The F35 is fact. They have spent a trillion dollars on this albatross and it still has serious problems. Google it yourself; even the New York Times has written about it. Lad, if US Defence News talks about this then you know it’s bad.
Yes, the F35 was supposed to replace the F22 Raptor.
Australia is one country that has been paying to develop that jet and to date only 2 have been delivered and so far, they only do flyovers on special occasions.
That’s the problem with people like yourself, you can’t get your point across because you have little to no knowledge so you rely on Janes weekly to tell you all about the superiority of US weaponry. The sad part is that the US would have used these superior weapons in Afghanistan, Iraq etc, but they have not because they don’t have them. It’s called spin.
Wars like Afghanistan and Iraq is where you test new weaponry.