icj1
pre 5 godina
The "damage" I'm talking about is the damage to NATO's reputation and historical legacy...
(Watcher, 7 May 2018 17:44)
Few people, if any, are aware of this "damage to NATO's reputation and historical legacy" that you dreamed about, dear. That's because NATO's intervention forced the forces under the control of the FRY and Serbian authorities to withdraw from Kosovo since, according to the UN, it was the deliberate actions of those forces that caused the departure of at least 700000 Kosovo Albanians from Kosovo in the short period of time between the end of March and beginning of June 1999.
----------
NATO had to do something...like agree to Res.1244...
(Watcher, 7 May 2018 17:44)
According to the UN, it was Serbia that was forced to agree to Res. 1244, not NATO.
----------
which leaves BG with an opening to "legaly" win this whole fiasco by bringing World Opinion into it...
(Watcher, 7 May 2018 17:44)
Res. 1244 (which was adopted over Serbia's vehement opposition) is not a fiasco dear; Res. 1244 represents the World Opinion, whether Serbia or you like it or not.
----------
Again, BG has to yield to superior forces, but it doesn't have to give color to it...and it won't!
(Watcher, 7 May 2018 17:44)
That's good... All the superior forces cared about was to force BG to yield. As for the colors, that's your and BG's business; the superior forces could not care less :)
19 Komentari
Sortiraj po: