Croatia's marked as aggressor, they can't sue - Dacic

Time has come for Serbia to sue Croatia for ww1 and ww2 crimes that they committed against Serbian population.Forget what EU wants just sue Croatia and make them pay big.

dragan

I have better idea. How about Croatia,Bosnia,and Kosova sue serbia for ethnic cleansing and aggression committed towards defenseless civilians that never did anything towards servs. 90% of all war crimes were committed by serbian pig farmers who wanted greater servia. You are the ones who should pay billions for compensation and the ones who started the wars

I have better idea. How about Croatia,Bosnia,and Kosova sue serbia for ethnic cleansing and aggression committed towards defenseless civilians that never did anything towards servs. 90% of all war crimes were committed by serbian pig farmers who wanted greater servia. You are the ones who should pay billions for compensation and the ones who started the wars
(Victory1999, 14 December 2017 13:08

Vicki, Vicki, Vicki, my sweet little Cro Facist. Unless you live under a rock, everyone knows that the largest group to get ethnically cleansed was 250,000 Krajina Serbs from Croatia - I suppose you forgot this one. Of course with the help of US/NATO - we know you couldn't of done it yourselves. Any thoughts on this one Stipe???

"Croatia has been marked as an aggressor. It has been marked in the Tribunal; Serbia has not been marked by any act," he told TV Pink."

No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality.

From icj1 the Serb-Hater: "No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality."

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise and the Croatian army to have ethnically cleansed Muslims in Bosnia and Hercegovina.'

To most logical individuals, those sound like the acts of an 'aggressor.' Don't you think sweetie????

To most logical individuals, those sound like the acts of an 'aggressor.' Don't you think sweetie????
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)
=========================
Look who you're talking to.
Have you ever heard icj make sense?

In the verdict in the trial against Sesjl, 2 out 3 judges ruled that the state of war in Yugoslavia was legitimate due to illegal secession.

Time has come for Serbia to sue Croatia for ww1 and ww2 crimes that they committed against Serbian population.
(dragan, 14 December 2017 12:32)

Who are the criminals that you want Serbia to sue, dear?!

Serbia should sue Croatia for Battle of Waterloo and the invasion of the Falkland islands.

Little Sloba did it again. How many times has Serbia been marked as an aggressor? When somebody accuses Serbs of this they come up with news ideas.

Good point Peggy.

Slobo was acquitted of all charges.
(ChiTown, 15 December 2017 16:09)

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?

No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality.
(icj1, 14 December 2017 14:36)

Wrong, They did just that. The Tribunal named Franjo Tudjman as the person who ordered Croatian troops into Bosnia and those 6, now less one, were part of those troops and Tudjman was the President of Croatia then Croatia is the aggressor. They have recordings of Tudjman and the six planning their actions as well as a paper trail.

Unless there is an Albo law that covers this aspect and declares otherwise.

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

You need to educate yourself before posting nonsense!!!!
(ChiTown, 15 December 2017 16:09)

Well, it was the Hague that found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise, not me. If you believe that the Hague's finding is nonsense, feel free to let the UN know about that.

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

There is nothing new about a Serbian leader being blamed since it was all the Serbs fault including the little tiff between the Croats and Bosniaks in Bosnia - Plenkovic mentioned it today. The Tribunal never found a former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise. Milosevic died before any conclusions could be drawn.

What is fascinating is that the Croats were on the side of the west from the start and were protected by the west. In fact the US authorized Croatia to send in Croat regular troops into Bosnia to fight the Serbs. Croatia had 15 brigades in Bosnia.

However, this Appellant court ruling has placed a knife squarely in Croatia's back and then twisted the blade in the wound. Now if they did that to the Croats they can do it even quicker to the Albanians LOL. I warned people that the west is one mean bitch.

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

icjago_f,

Slobo was acquitted of all charges. Too bad he didn't live long enough to laugh at the Tribunal since he was vindicated. You need to educate yourself before posting nonsense!!!!

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!

Have you ever heard icj make sense?
(Peggy, 14 December 2017 20:52)

Yes. For example when icj found that Serbia had not committed genocide and had not conspired to commit genocide in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Don't you agree that the icj finding above makes sense?

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?
(icj1, 16 December 2017 15:28

icj - if you really wanted to find out the truth rather than spewing your venom, you could have looked this up yourself - a little thing called Google. Since you're too lazy to do your own search, I just picked the first, out of thousands, article I saw. From now on, don't post anything without attaching a link, you need to stop being lazy and start proving the nonsense you leave on this forum. Have a nice read.....

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/354362-slobodan-milosevic-exonerated-us-nato/

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?
(icj1, 16 December 2017 15:28

icj - if you really wanted to find out the truth rather than spewing your venom, you could have looked this up yourself - a little thing called Google. Since you're too lazy to do your own search, I just picked the first, out of thousands, article I saw.

[link]/
(ChiTown, 21 December 2017 03:29)

Nice try, but that link is rt.com and that is not ICTY's website. The UNSC has not appointed rt.com to issue judgements for ICTY. So you still have not provided any link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges.

dragan

I have better idea. How about Croatia,Bosnia,and Kosova sue serbia for ethnic cleansing and aggression committed towards defenseless civilians that never did anything towards servs. 90% of all war crimes were committed by serbian pig farmers who wanted greater servia. You are the ones who should pay billions for compensation and the ones who started the wars

Time has come for Serbia to sue Croatia for ww1 and ww2 crimes that they committed against Serbian population.
(dragan, 14 December 2017 12:32)

Who are the criminals that you want Serbia to sue, dear?!

"Croatia has been marked as an aggressor. It has been marked in the Tribunal; Serbia has not been marked by any act," he told TV Pink."

No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality.

Time has come for Serbia to sue Croatia for ww1 and ww2 crimes that they committed against Serbian population.Forget what EU wants just sue Croatia and make them pay big.

I have better idea. How about Croatia,Bosnia,and Kosova sue serbia for ethnic cleansing and aggression committed towards defenseless civilians that never did anything towards servs. 90% of all war crimes were committed by serbian pig farmers who wanted greater servia. You are the ones who should pay billions for compensation and the ones who started the wars
(Victory1999, 14 December 2017 13:08

Vicki, Vicki, Vicki, my sweet little Cro Facist. Unless you live under a rock, everyone knows that the largest group to get ethnically cleansed was 250,000 Krajina Serbs from Croatia - I suppose you forgot this one. Of course with the help of US/NATO - we know you couldn't of done it yourselves. Any thoughts on this one Stipe???

Serbia should sue Croatia for Battle of Waterloo and the invasion of the Falkland islands.

Little Sloba did it again. How many times has Serbia been marked as an aggressor? When somebody accuses Serbs of this they come up with news ideas.

From icj1 the Serb-Hater: "No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality."

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise and the Croatian army to have ethnically cleansed Muslims in Bosnia and Hercegovina.'

To most logical individuals, those sound like the acts of an 'aggressor.' Don't you think sweetie????

In the verdict in the trial against Sesjl, 2 out 3 judges ruled that the state of war in Yugoslavia was legitimate due to illegal secession.

To most logical individuals, those sound like the acts of an 'aggressor.' Don't you think sweetie????
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)
=========================
Look who you're talking to.
Have you ever heard icj make sense?

Good point Peggy.

No Tribunal has marked Croatia as an aggressor. That's a dream that Ivica experienced and he is confusing it with reality.
(icj1, 14 December 2017 14:36)

Wrong, They did just that. The Tribunal named Franjo Tudjman as the person who ordered Croatian troops into Bosnia and those 6, now less one, were part of those troops and Tudjman was the President of Croatia then Croatia is the aggressor. They have recordings of Tudjman and the six planning their actions as well as a paper trail.

Unless there is an Albo law that covers this aspect and declares otherwise.

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!

Have you ever heard icj make sense?
(Peggy, 14 December 2017 20:52)

Yes. For example when icj found that Serbia had not committed genocide and had not conspired to commit genocide in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Don't you agree that the icj finding above makes sense?

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

icjago_f,

Slobo was acquitted of all charges. Too bad he didn't live long enough to laugh at the Tribunal since he was vindicated. You need to educate yourself before posting nonsense!!!!

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

There is nothing new about a Serbian leader being blamed since it was all the Serbs fault including the little tiff between the Croats and Bosniaks in Bosnia - Plenkovic mentioned it today. The Tribunal never found a former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise. Milosevic died before any conclusions could be drawn.

What is fascinating is that the Croats were on the side of the west from the start and were protected by the west. In fact the US authorized Croatia to send in Croat regular troops into Bosnia to fight the Serbs. Croatia had 15 brigades in Bosnia.

However, this Appellant court ruling has placed a knife squarely in Croatia's back and then twisted the blade in the wound. Now if they did that to the Croats they can do it even quicker to the Albanians LOL. I warned people that the west is one mean bitch.

Slobo was acquitted of all charges.
(ChiTown, 15 December 2017 16:09)

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?

The Hague found the former leaders of Croatia to have operated a 'Joint Criminal Enterprise
(njegos, 14 December 2017 17:14)

And the Hague also found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise... So, it's not clear what your point is!
(icj1, 15 December 2017 02:38)

You need to educate yourself before posting nonsense!!!!
(ChiTown, 15 December 2017 16:09)

Well, it was the Hague that found the former leader of Serbia to be a member of a joint criminal enterprise, not me. If you believe that the Hague's finding is nonsense, feel free to let the UN know about that.

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?
(icj1, 16 December 2017 15:28

icj - if you really wanted to find out the truth rather than spewing your venom, you could have looked this up yourself - a little thing called Google. Since you're too lazy to do your own search, I just picked the first, out of thousands, article I saw. From now on, don't post anything without attaching a link, you need to stop being lazy and start proving the nonsense you leave on this forum. Have a nice read.....

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/354362-slobodan-milosevic-exonerated-us-nato/

Can you provide to a link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges?
(icj1, 16 December 2017 15:28

icj - if you really wanted to find out the truth rather than spewing your venom, you could have looked this up yourself - a little thing called Google. Since you're too lazy to do your own search, I just picked the first, out of thousands, article I saw.

[link]/
(ChiTown, 21 December 2017 03:29)

Nice try, but that link is rt.com and that is not ICTY's website. The UNSC has not appointed rt.com to issue judgements for ICTY. So you still have not provided any link to the ICTY judgement that acquitted Slobo of all charges.