"We angered both EU and Russia - we're doing it right"

Serbia considers Crimea part of Ukraine... fantastic Serbia wants to join the EU... great, Serbia doesn't want to join NATO, okay... Serbia doesn't impose sanctions against Russia, that's fine.... oh sorry you have to when you become an EU member.

No one left to anger, no one left to please!!!

You cannot enter the same water twice ///// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9ARcLTcqoA

This current Serbian goverment is F-up our only survival is with Mother Russia !

Walter nobody in Serbia except Vucic wants to join the EU it's finished and Serbia is right nobody helped us in 1999 or later

The two issues have nothing to do with each other in that way at all. Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia. And, at the same time, Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Furthermore, there is nothing to brag about diplomatically when you anger two powers vying for your attention at the same time. That Russia is a friend to Serbia is obvious to anyone who cares to look and to see that the EU is hostile is equally obvious.

If Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Rome

Or, if Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Ukraine, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Feel free to pick,the first or the second option.... but you can't have your cake and eat it throw :)
(icj1, 1 December 2016 14:49)

Do you know what Oxymoron means? Maybe you can explain that moronic statement above?

Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia. And, at the same time, Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.
(Paul, 30 November 2016 19:31)

If Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Rome

Or, if Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Ukraine, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Feel free to pick,the first or the second option.... but you can't have your cake and eat it throw :)

wow, the best apples to bricks comparison ever

option 1 sounds good.
since rome (as a nation no longer exists) default kosovo clause to option 2.

by the way... before rome greece was in charge... its greek and since greece exists to take ownership, that would be the prudent approach (don't you think)

Serbia considers Crimea part of Ukraine... fantastic Serbia wants to join the EU... great, Serbia doesn't want to join NATO, okay... Serbia doesn't impose sanctions against Russia, that's fine.... oh sorry you have to when you become an EU member.

This current Serbian goverment is F-up our only survival is with Mother Russia !

Walter nobody in Serbia except Vucic wants to join the EU it's finished and Serbia is right nobody helped us in 1999 or later

You cannot enter the same water twice ///// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9ARcLTcqoA

No one left to anger, no one left to please!!!

The two issues have nothing to do with each other in that way at all. Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia. And, at the same time, Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Furthermore, there is nothing to brag about diplomatically when you anger two powers vying for your attention at the same time. That Russia is a friend to Serbia is obvious to anyone who cares to look and to see that the EU is hostile is equally obvious.

Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia. And, at the same time, Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.
(Paul, 30 November 2016 19:31)

If Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Rome

Or, if Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Ukraine, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Feel free to pick,the first or the second option.... but you can't have your cake and eat it throw :)

If Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Russia, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Rome

Or, if Crimea is properly and historically a legitimate part of Ukraine, then Kosovo is properly and historically a legitimate part of Serbia.

Feel free to pick,the first or the second option.... but you can't have your cake and eat it throw :)
(icj1, 1 December 2016 14:49)

Do you know what Oxymoron means? Maybe you can explain that moronic statement above?

wow, the best apples to bricks comparison ever

option 1 sounds good.
since rome (as a nation no longer exists) default kosovo clause to option 2.

by the way... before rome greece was in charge... its greek and since greece exists to take ownership, that would be the prudent approach (don't you think)