24

Tuesday, 30.06.2015.

09:03

Russian resolution condemns all crimes, supports Dayton

A draft Russian resolution on Bosnia strongly condemns and deplores the most serious crimes committed during the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia.

Izvor: Tanjug

Russian resolution condemns all crimes, supports Dayton IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

24 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

point of clarification

pre 8 godina

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”
(rote kapelle, 1 July 2015 15:56)
You are not quite accurate, Jews, Christians and Muslims believe in the same God but only those who believe Jesus is the Son of God are Christians and they are considered 3 distinct religions. So while there may be no contradiction, a point of clarification is totally appropriate.
Don't know if the person is really who he says he is but then again is anyone on this site REAL?

j

pre 8 godina

Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children.

-- Peggy, Hitler allowed women and children to get on trains and leave. There's footage of that as well. The problem is to find out what happened after the footage ends and what happened on the way and in the final station.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

This is why the british draft must be adopted, serbs massacred civilians and claim they killed enemy soldiers without any casualties on their side. But hey at least they didn't kill women, they were sent to slave camps and raped, but hey rapists are among the most noble serb heroes.

factman

pre 8 godina

Answer to Nenad and Bob:

Because 3500 Bosniak soldiers were retreating through the forest to escape to Tuzla. The Serbs ambushed them and trapped them in the forest. That's why you don't hear of Serb casualties. There were none. It was very one-sided.

Grizzly scene and ugly? Yes. Very much so. The word inhumane comes to mind.

Genocide? No.

rote kapelle

pre 8 godina

"Christian pastor named abdullah"

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”

factman

pre 8 godina

Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide.

Everywhere genocide. Its a wonder that anyone is still alive?!?! You have so cheapened the word genocide in Bosnia that you should be imprisoned for a crime against humanity.

Peggy

pre 8 godina

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.
(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)
=================================
Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children. Now if Muslims give 14 year old boys guns to fight in their army it's their problem. They obviously don't consider them children.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

I'm still waiting for russia to recognize that all sides are guilty for the massacres in russia after the nazi invasion, oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.

ida

pre 8 godina

People ignore the genocide of Serbs in Srebrenica who were killed and cleansed at the beginning of the war, then the Bosnian Muslims raided and destroyed scores of Serbian villages all around Srebrenica. They kept expanding in a greater radius until the Serb forces got organized and started beating Naser Oric's forces back.
The Muslim Srebrenica dead are virtually all soldiers who died throughout the war - and including many who were never in Srebrenica.
They are collecting dead Muslim soldiers from all of eastern Bosnia and claiming they were killed during the fall when many were not.

There was also some running battles during the escape from Srebrenica - the Bosnian Muslim army was ordered to walk out the day/night before the fall and they had to go through many miles of Serb-held territory.

The Serbs became alarmed at these large columns of Muslim soldiers and men moving through their territory and there were fights.

Robert

pre 8 godina

You people are forgetting that Srebrenica is not the only genocide that happened in Bosnia. The genocide and war crime occurred in Prijedor, Sanski Most, Bijeljina, Sarajevo, Zvornik, BanjaLuka, Kljuc, etc. So for you who deny that genocide ever happened in Stebrenica, cannot deny the scale of atrocities elsewhere in Bosnia.

gwiz

pre 8 godina

nenad, this one statement alone renders your comment moot:
Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense
officials from those countries routinely turn a blind eye to the mass slaughter of unarmed civilians. these countries are also responsible for the mass extinction of a significant number of unarmed civilians all over the world. so, yes they will turn a blind eye if it fits their political pictures.
it is estimated that in the United war (that is United States and United Kingdom) against iraq has left in its wake 500,000 dead, or seriously injured unarmed civilians. this is on their heads, like it or not. They invaded iraq, bombed iraq, forcibly removed the government or iraq and yet somehow there are still people who believe that are a bringers of peace.
russia ain't no angel, but to think any other internationally powerful country is, is just fooling yourself into complacency.

sasa.p

pre 8 godina

People are missing the point,only 2000 odd soldiers got killed on Muslim side,and that 1000 and more Serb cilivians where killed in June/ July 1992 ,theat Oric and his cronies killed poor villages that is not mention buy the worse mass murder's the British in History, how dare the British out of all countries with they history write.They should have a look at their own history.

fact man

pre 8 godina

"Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this."

That's true. But so is this British trash that was written to achieve geo-political re-alignment in the Balkans. It is not worth the toilet paper it was written on. Serbia rejects it. And without Serbia, you have no Balkans. Period.

Serbs saw first hand how guns were smuggled into safe zones and mixed in with food. Say one thing diplomatically, do another in deed. Classic British two-facedness.

Tell them to return the Elgin marbles to Greece, then maybe someone will listen.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)

Who says I am shifting blame? That is your assumption.
We know who killed these people there. Question is, could it have been prevented? Why was it not prevented? Even the Dutch minister at that time now says that close air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. 9 times they asked for air support so the Dutch commanders and government were willing to take risks but the international partners apparently not. Why was air support denied? According to files in the Clinton library there was agreement between the US, the UK and FR to deny air support. So an ally -NL- was left hung out to dry while they tried to stop Mladic and his men. They were betrayed by their own partners.

Nenad

pre 8 godina

Edwin's comment about Serbs not having to massacre civilians - regardless of whether they had the green light from NATO and/or the UN to enter Srebrenica - is worth noting. For years, we've seen conspiracy theories about how the West tacitly agreed to let the Serbs re-take Srebrenica for the sake of a final territorial settlement. Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense.

Of course, the other conspiracy theory we always hear is that the victims were mainly ABiH soldiers. OK, if true, who are the 6,000+ that have been gradually identified and laid to rest over the past 20 years? And why don't we ever hear about Serb casualties in the alleged battles fought with these ABiH soldiers? Ever hear of infantry battles in which only one side takes losses?

I think the Russians should be busy writing a resolution about how they should apologize for their invasion of Ukraine. They've already proudly admitted to their role in Crimea, and no one doubts that they are driving the conflict currently raging in the east. Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Again there is no evidence eve if i believe it might have happened. If journalists have evidence then why arent they showing it? Or send it to wikileaks? Dutch goverment has gotten the blame for Srebrenica and it isnt shocking that theyd want that blame to go to someone else aswell.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.

factman

pre 8 godina

Here is aome text that you can copy and paste below into your comments:

What a horrible draft. It should be rejected by Sarajevo and her Western supporters. How dare those damn Russians write something that is politically motivated and unjust towards the dead who suffered so much at the hands of the nazi serb aggressors. This goes against the main script we agreed to many years ago. We wont get any press coverage with this draft. It really messes. up our post-war agenda to reverse the losses we sustained on the battlefield.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 11:52)

Actually, documentation pointing to this supposed secret agreement has been found in the Clinton library by Dutch journalists. I did not see the documentary myself so I only quote the Dutch news sites. Here is one link. Scroll down for English:
http://www.vpro.nl/lees/nieuws/2015/Srebrenica---Amerikanen-hielden-luchtsteun-tegen.html

Here link to documentary: http://www.npo.nl/2doc/29-06-2015/VPWON_1234537
(I think you need Silverlight for that. I can't get it to work)

According to the journalist, there was a secret agreement between the US, the UK and FR about withholding air support. That information was not shared with the Dutch Government.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

This isnt new news. This is old news in fact. I hear this first from my father but USA and Britain had nothing to do with it. It was a french commander who controlled the airforce who said they should not venture out but to stay put. The french have always supported serbs in some way. The same group made deals with the serbs during the war aswell.

This all might be conspiracy or not beacuse there isnt any factual evidence, only talks.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

Documentary broadcast last night on Dutch television revealed that the US, Britain and France had a secret agreement to withhold air support to Dutchbat that was stationed at Srebrenica. That air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. Air support was used in Grozde so why not in Srebenica and why was this kept secret? Dutchbat and the people of Srebrenica were abandoned. Why?

Nenad

pre 8 godina

Edwin's comment about Serbs not having to massacre civilians - regardless of whether they had the green light from NATO and/or the UN to enter Srebrenica - is worth noting. For years, we've seen conspiracy theories about how the West tacitly agreed to let the Serbs re-take Srebrenica for the sake of a final territorial settlement. Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense.

Of course, the other conspiracy theory we always hear is that the victims were mainly ABiH soldiers. OK, if true, who are the 6,000+ that have been gradually identified and laid to rest over the past 20 years? And why don't we ever hear about Serb casualties in the alleged battles fought with these ABiH soldiers? Ever hear of infantry battles in which only one side takes losses?

I think the Russians should be busy writing a resolution about how they should apologize for their invasion of Ukraine. They've already proudly admitted to their role in Crimea, and no one doubts that they are driving the conflict currently raging in the east. Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this.

Robert

pre 8 godina

You people are forgetting that Srebrenica is not the only genocide that happened in Bosnia. The genocide and war crime occurred in Prijedor, Sanski Most, Bijeljina, Sarajevo, Zvornik, BanjaLuka, Kljuc, etc. So for you who deny that genocide ever happened in Stebrenica, cannot deny the scale of atrocities elsewhere in Bosnia.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.

fact man

pre 8 godina

"Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this."

That's true. But so is this British trash that was written to achieve geo-political re-alignment in the Balkans. It is not worth the toilet paper it was written on. Serbia rejects it. And without Serbia, you have no Balkans. Period.

Serbs saw first hand how guns were smuggled into safe zones and mixed in with food. Say one thing diplomatically, do another in deed. Classic British two-facedness.

Tell them to return the Elgin marbles to Greece, then maybe someone will listen.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

Documentary broadcast last night on Dutch television revealed that the US, Britain and France had a secret agreement to withhold air support to Dutchbat that was stationed at Srebrenica. That air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. Air support was used in Grozde so why not in Srebenica and why was this kept secret? Dutchbat and the people of Srebrenica were abandoned. Why?

factman

pre 8 godina

Here is aome text that you can copy and paste below into your comments:

What a horrible draft. It should be rejected by Sarajevo and her Western supporters. How dare those damn Russians write something that is politically motivated and unjust towards the dead who suffered so much at the hands of the nazi serb aggressors. This goes against the main script we agreed to many years ago. We wont get any press coverage with this draft. It really messes. up our post-war agenda to reverse the losses we sustained on the battlefield.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)

Who says I am shifting blame? That is your assumption.
We know who killed these people there. Question is, could it have been prevented? Why was it not prevented? Even the Dutch minister at that time now says that close air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. 9 times they asked for air support so the Dutch commanders and government were willing to take risks but the international partners apparently not. Why was air support denied? According to files in the Clinton library there was agreement between the US, the UK and FR to deny air support. So an ally -NL- was left hung out to dry while they tried to stop Mladic and his men. They were betrayed by their own partners.

sasa.p

pre 8 godina

People are missing the point,only 2000 odd soldiers got killed on Muslim side,and that 1000 and more Serb cilivians where killed in June/ July 1992 ,theat Oric and his cronies killed poor villages that is not mention buy the worse mass murder's the British in History, how dare the British out of all countries with they history write.They should have a look at their own history.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

This isnt new news. This is old news in fact. I hear this first from my father but USA and Britain had nothing to do with it. It was a french commander who controlled the airforce who said they should not venture out but to stay put. The french have always supported serbs in some way. The same group made deals with the serbs during the war aswell.

This all might be conspiracy or not beacuse there isnt any factual evidence, only talks.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

I'm still waiting for russia to recognize that all sides are guilty for the massacres in russia after the nazi invasion, oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Again there is no evidence eve if i believe it might have happened. If journalists have evidence then why arent they showing it? Or send it to wikileaks? Dutch goverment has gotten the blame for Srebrenica and it isnt shocking that theyd want that blame to go to someone else aswell.

gwiz

pre 8 godina

nenad, this one statement alone renders your comment moot:
Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense
officials from those countries routinely turn a blind eye to the mass slaughter of unarmed civilians. these countries are also responsible for the mass extinction of a significant number of unarmed civilians all over the world. so, yes they will turn a blind eye if it fits their political pictures.
it is estimated that in the United war (that is United States and United Kingdom) against iraq has left in its wake 500,000 dead, or seriously injured unarmed civilians. this is on their heads, like it or not. They invaded iraq, bombed iraq, forcibly removed the government or iraq and yet somehow there are still people who believe that are a bringers of peace.
russia ain't no angel, but to think any other internationally powerful country is, is just fooling yourself into complacency.

ida

pre 8 godina

People ignore the genocide of Serbs in Srebrenica who were killed and cleansed at the beginning of the war, then the Bosnian Muslims raided and destroyed scores of Serbian villages all around Srebrenica. They kept expanding in a greater radius until the Serb forces got organized and started beating Naser Oric's forces back.
The Muslim Srebrenica dead are virtually all soldiers who died throughout the war - and including many who were never in Srebrenica.
They are collecting dead Muslim soldiers from all of eastern Bosnia and claiming they were killed during the fall when many were not.

There was also some running battles during the escape from Srebrenica - the Bosnian Muslim army was ordered to walk out the day/night before the fall and they had to go through many miles of Serb-held territory.

The Serbs became alarmed at these large columns of Muslim soldiers and men moving through their territory and there were fights.

Peggy

pre 8 godina

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.
(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)
=================================
Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children. Now if Muslims give 14 year old boys guns to fight in their army it's their problem. They obviously don't consider them children.

factman

pre 8 godina

Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide.

Everywhere genocide. Its a wonder that anyone is still alive?!?! You have so cheapened the word genocide in Bosnia that you should be imprisoned for a crime against humanity.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

This is why the british draft must be adopted, serbs massacred civilians and claim they killed enemy soldiers without any casualties on their side. But hey at least they didn't kill women, they were sent to slave camps and raped, but hey rapists are among the most noble serb heroes.

j

pre 8 godina

Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children.

-- Peggy, Hitler allowed women and children to get on trains and leave. There's footage of that as well. The problem is to find out what happened after the footage ends and what happened on the way and in the final station.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 11:52)

Actually, documentation pointing to this supposed secret agreement has been found in the Clinton library by Dutch journalists. I did not see the documentary myself so I only quote the Dutch news sites. Here is one link. Scroll down for English:
http://www.vpro.nl/lees/nieuws/2015/Srebrenica---Amerikanen-hielden-luchtsteun-tegen.html

Here link to documentary: http://www.npo.nl/2doc/29-06-2015/VPWON_1234537
(I think you need Silverlight for that. I can't get it to work)

According to the journalist, there was a secret agreement between the US, the UK and FR about withholding air support. That information was not shared with the Dutch Government.

rote kapelle

pre 8 godina

"Christian pastor named abdullah"

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”

factman

pre 8 godina

Answer to Nenad and Bob:

Because 3500 Bosniak soldiers were retreating through the forest to escape to Tuzla. The Serbs ambushed them and trapped them in the forest. That's why you don't hear of Serb casualties. There were none. It was very one-sided.

Grizzly scene and ugly? Yes. Very much so. The word inhumane comes to mind.

Genocide? No.

point of clarification

pre 8 godina

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”
(rote kapelle, 1 July 2015 15:56)
You are not quite accurate, Jews, Christians and Muslims believe in the same God but only those who believe Jesus is the Son of God are Christians and they are considered 3 distinct religions. So while there may be no contradiction, a point of clarification is totally appropriate.
Don't know if the person is really who he says he is but then again is anyone on this site REAL?

factman

pre 8 godina

Here is aome text that you can copy and paste below into your comments:

What a horrible draft. It should be rejected by Sarajevo and her Western supporters. How dare those damn Russians write something that is politically motivated and unjust towards the dead who suffered so much at the hands of the nazi serb aggressors. This goes against the main script we agreed to many years ago. We wont get any press coverage with this draft. It really messes. up our post-war agenda to reverse the losses we sustained on the battlefield.

Nenad

pre 8 godina

Edwin's comment about Serbs not having to massacre civilians - regardless of whether they had the green light from NATO and/or the UN to enter Srebrenica - is worth noting. For years, we've seen conspiracy theories about how the West tacitly agreed to let the Serbs re-take Srebrenica for the sake of a final territorial settlement. Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense.

Of course, the other conspiracy theory we always hear is that the victims were mainly ABiH soldiers. OK, if true, who are the 6,000+ that have been gradually identified and laid to rest over the past 20 years? And why don't we ever hear about Serb casualties in the alleged battles fought with these ABiH soldiers? Ever hear of infantry battles in which only one side takes losses?

I think the Russians should be busy writing a resolution about how they should apologize for their invasion of Ukraine. They've already proudly admitted to their role in Crimea, and no one doubts that they are driving the conflict currently raging in the east. Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

Documentary broadcast last night on Dutch television revealed that the US, Britain and France had a secret agreement to withhold air support to Dutchbat that was stationed at Srebrenica. That air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. Air support was used in Grozde so why not in Srebenica and why was this kept secret? Dutchbat and the people of Srebrenica were abandoned. Why?

fact man

pre 8 godina

"Their credibility with the rest of the world is so low that one has to wonder why they would even bother wasting the ink on a document such as this."

That's true. But so is this British trash that was written to achieve geo-political re-alignment in the Balkans. It is not worth the toilet paper it was written on. Serbia rejects it. And without Serbia, you have no Balkans. Period.

Serbs saw first hand how guns were smuggled into safe zones and mixed in with food. Say one thing diplomatically, do another in deed. Classic British two-facedness.

Tell them to return the Elgin marbles to Greece, then maybe someone will listen.

sasa.p

pre 8 godina

People are missing the point,only 2000 odd soldiers got killed on Muslim side,and that 1000 and more Serb cilivians where killed in June/ July 1992 ,theat Oric and his cronies killed poor villages that is not mention buy the worse mass murder's the British in History, how dare the British out of all countries with they history write.They should have a look at their own history.

Peggy

pre 8 godina

Furthermore even if it is all true neither Britain, USA or Netherlands kill all those muslims. Serbs didnt have to kill them. Serbs didnt have to kill children amongst them. Serbs didnt have to kill those old people. You can try to blame someone else for it but in the end serbs have the blood on their hands and not anyone else for the massacere in Srebrenica.
(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)
=================================
Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children. Now if Muslims give 14 year old boys guns to fight in their army it's their problem. They obviously don't consider them children.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 15:37)

Who says I am shifting blame? That is your assumption.
We know who killed these people there. Question is, could it have been prevented? Why was it not prevented? Even the Dutch minister at that time now says that close air support could have prevented the enclave from falling. 9 times they asked for air support so the Dutch commanders and government were willing to take risks but the international partners apparently not. Why was air support denied? According to files in the Clinton library there was agreement between the US, the UK and FR to deny air support. So an ally -NL- was left hung out to dry while they tried to stop Mladic and his men. They were betrayed by their own partners.

ida

pre 8 godina

People ignore the genocide of Serbs in Srebrenica who were killed and cleansed at the beginning of the war, then the Bosnian Muslims raided and destroyed scores of Serbian villages all around Srebrenica. They kept expanding in a greater radius until the Serb forces got organized and started beating Naser Oric's forces back.
The Muslim Srebrenica dead are virtually all soldiers who died throughout the war - and including many who were never in Srebrenica.
They are collecting dead Muslim soldiers from all of eastern Bosnia and claiming they were killed during the fall when many were not.

There was also some running battles during the escape from Srebrenica - the Bosnian Muslim army was ordered to walk out the day/night before the fall and they had to go through many miles of Serb-held territory.

The Serbs became alarmed at these large columns of Muslim soldiers and men moving through their territory and there were fights.

Joe A

pre 8 godina

(Edwin, 30 June 2015 11:52)

Actually, documentation pointing to this supposed secret agreement has been found in the Clinton library by Dutch journalists. I did not see the documentary myself so I only quote the Dutch news sites. Here is one link. Scroll down for English:
http://www.vpro.nl/lees/nieuws/2015/Srebrenica---Amerikanen-hielden-luchtsteun-tegen.html

Here link to documentary: http://www.npo.nl/2doc/29-06-2015/VPWON_1234537
(I think you need Silverlight for that. I can't get it to work)

According to the journalist, there was a secret agreement between the US, the UK and FR about withholding air support. That information was not shared with the Dutch Government.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

This isnt new news. This is old news in fact. I hear this first from my father but USA and Britain had nothing to do with it. It was a french commander who controlled the airforce who said they should not venture out but to stay put. The french have always supported serbs in some way. The same group made deals with the serbs during the war aswell.

This all might be conspiracy or not beacuse there isnt any factual evidence, only talks.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

I'm still waiting for russia to recognize that all sides are guilty for the massacres in russia after the nazi invasion, oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.

factman

pre 8 godina

Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. Genocide.

Everywhere genocide. Its a wonder that anyone is still alive?!?! You have so cheapened the word genocide in Bosnia that you should be imprisoned for a crime against humanity.

Christian pastor named abdullah

pre 8 godina

This is why the british draft must be adopted, serbs massacred civilians and claim they killed enemy soldiers without any casualties on their side. But hey at least they didn't kill women, they were sent to slave camps and raped, but hey rapists are among the most noble serb heroes.

Edwin

pre 8 godina

Joe

Again there is no evidence eve if i believe it might have happened. If journalists have evidence then why arent they showing it? Or send it to wikileaks? Dutch goverment has gotten the blame for Srebrenica and it isnt shocking that theyd want that blame to go to someone else aswell.

gwiz

pre 8 godina

nenad, this one statement alone renders your comment moot:
Even if true, would anyone from Britain, France, Holland or the US agreed to turn a blind eye to mass slaughter of unarmed civilians? This defies common sense
officials from those countries routinely turn a blind eye to the mass slaughter of unarmed civilians. these countries are also responsible for the mass extinction of a significant number of unarmed civilians all over the world. so, yes they will turn a blind eye if it fits their political pictures.
it is estimated that in the United war (that is United States and United Kingdom) against iraq has left in its wake 500,000 dead, or seriously injured unarmed civilians. this is on their heads, like it or not. They invaded iraq, bombed iraq, forcibly removed the government or iraq and yet somehow there are still people who believe that are a bringers of peace.
russia ain't no angel, but to think any other internationally powerful country is, is just fooling yourself into complacency.

rote kapelle

pre 8 godina

"Christian pastor named abdullah"

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”

factman

pre 8 godina

Answer to Nenad and Bob:

Because 3500 Bosniak soldiers were retreating through the forest to escape to Tuzla. The Serbs ambushed them and trapped them in the forest. That's why you don't hear of Serb casualties. There were none. It was very one-sided.

Grizzly scene and ugly? Yes. Very much so. The word inhumane comes to mind.

Genocide? No.

Robert

pre 8 godina

You people are forgetting that Srebrenica is not the only genocide that happened in Bosnia. The genocide and war crime occurred in Prijedor, Sanski Most, Bijeljina, Sarajevo, Zvornik, BanjaLuka, Kljuc, etc. So for you who deny that genocide ever happened in Stebrenica, cannot deny the scale of atrocities elsewhere in Bosnia.

j

pre 8 godina

Mladic allowed women and children to get on the busses and leave. There is footage of it so don't come here saying he killed all the children.

-- Peggy, Hitler allowed women and children to get on trains and leave. There's footage of that as well. The problem is to find out what happened after the footage ends and what happened on the way and in the final station.

point of clarification

pre 8 godina

I have to disappoint you about your nickname. If you mean a joke religion is a bad field for that. Yet there’s no contradiction between “Christian pastor” and “Abdullah” because the English for Abdullah if Slave (abd) to God (Allah).

PS “oh wait I forgot russians are hypocrites.”
(rote kapelle, 1 July 2015 15:56)
You are not quite accurate, Jews, Christians and Muslims believe in the same God but only those who believe Jesus is the Son of God are Christians and they are considered 3 distinct religions. So while there may be no contradiction, a point of clarification is totally appropriate.
Don't know if the person is really who he says he is but then again is anyone on this site REAL?