Amnesty Yugoslavia
pre 9 godina
(Anon, 1 April 2015 10:51) There you go: [link]
---
Merci pour l'information. I read both the French and English versions upon publication.
Note: "ATTENDU qu'en application de l'article 65 (B) du Règlement, la Chambre a recueille du gouvernement de la République de Serbie, qui a donné son accord à ce que l'Accusé soit libéré dans son territoire à condition que celui-ci se soumette aux conditions fixé par la Chambre"
ICTY translated to:
CONSIDERING that pursuant to Rule 65(B) of the Rules, the Chamber obtained observations from the Government of the Republic of Serbia, which agreed to the Accused being released to its territory on condition that he adheres to the conditions set by the Chamber.
No conditions were presented to the accused and you may read further Judge Niang's dissenting opinion on the same date: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/seselj/tord/en/141111.pdf
"The Chamber sought the opinion of Serbia. It provided one, specifying that its cooperation was conditional on the Accused confirming that he will adhere to the Chamber's conditions. By choosing not to consult the Accused, the majority remains vague and this may in the future make Serbia's cooperation unfeasible.""
I know these are not words of the NYT or BIRN, and are "only" the words of a Judge from the trial chamber, but they may be important to your evaluation of the facts and claims about "failing media".
8 Komentari
Sortiraj po: