icj1
pre 12 godina
Actually if you double that number you just might get a better picture of the number of US deaths in Iraq up to so called cessation of combat operation in Iraq. Since that time the US has continued to lose troops due to sniper, road side bombs etc not on the scale as before.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
Even if you triple it (I’m even accepting your wrong numbers), it still remains one of the most successful wars in history given that hundreds of thousands of soldiers were deployed and only the number that you say was killed.
Fallujah was street to street fighting so I suggest that you ask anyone in the armed services what that means. I know for a fact that it’s the worst form of combat – this is where you are so close to the enemy that artillery and helicopters or aircraft are useless because you would bomb your own troops.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
That’s why I agreed with you that this was my preferred one, too :)
As I have said on numerous occasions you have to go well beyond the internet to find out the truth and that is the reason why I keep reminding people that government’s tell big lies in the “national interests” and the US government is the worst as its combined losses in Iraq and Afghanistan now exceeds 20 000. This fact HAS NEVER BEEN MENTIONED on any US government website.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
It does not matter… You are mentioning it :) That’s why we are all here to hear the true and exclusive news that only you have access to… You must open a news agency my friend. You'd make a lot of money, even more than CNN.
And no the 1200 is not part of the of any official death statistics. In all honesty I really don’t give a hoot whether you believe me or not as I am not here to prove to you or any of your Albanians a thing.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
Of course I believe you, so that you may feel happy :) Why deny you the happiness ?!
I literally campaigned for well over six months on the issue of the real unemployment figures in the US and I was hounded down as lies and unthruths, but now I have even some of the die hearts accepting that its closer to 22% as the government covers up these figures. Now if they lie about something like this why would they not hide something even worse as deaths in combat expacially since the US has lost it battle for Iarq.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
Well, if it makes you happy, I say that the unemployment figure in the US is 44%. This fact HAS NEVER BEEN MENTIONED on any US government website. Trust me… I asked a friend of mine in Malaysia who said so.
On the BBC issue, they uphol;d the national interest. Initially most of the media did report US losses but its how numbers were later manipulated in that interest. I don’t trust RTS either as it’s a government organization.
(sj, 5 September 2011 09:51)
As I said, BBC reported the US high casualties before, and the low casualties now. If I trusted it for the high ones, I don’t see why I should not trust it for the low ones. I don’t base trust on whether I like or not a particular news from BBC. I base the trust on whether their reporting is balanced and free of bias.
62 Komentari
Sortiraj po: