So the US has given up on removing Assad eh? or is it more like one of Aesop's fables about the fox and the grapes? http://www.aesopfables.com/cgi/aesop1.cgi?sel&TheFoxandtheGrapes2
Making Syrian President Bashar al-Assad leave power is not longer a priority of US foreign policy
BECAUSE ,they can not do it ,and failed )))
Had he not had Putin as a ally ,but USA/NATO ,he would have been gone ,like poor Saddam Hussein who had USA as ally against Iran in the 1980's found out the hard way.
How thinks has changed in world power strengths countries .
Soon the Red Dragon and the Big Bear will be ruling .
"against a stable, moderate government"
(Andy UK, 31 March 2017 11:18)
LOL, Stable possibly, moderate no.
Under Hafez, Syria invaded Lebabon and during the 100day war he killed 100,000 (mostly Christians) and created another 300.000 refugees.
Under Bashar the government used machine guns on on unarmed and peaceful protestors and Syria had training camps and safehouses for terrorists including ISIS. The could travel to Iraq to set off car bombs, then return for R&R in Syria.
Since the war started? Mass executions and torture of prisoners, attacking civilian areas and enemies with sarin and chlorine, just last week all evidence points to the use of Chlorine gas on civilians by Assad.
It's not great yet.It will be soon with Kosovo as part of Serbia as it's been for hundreds of years.Time is fast aporoaching and you should fasten your belts.
Thank goodness that 27 years of failed American presidencies and poor foreign policy choices have come to an end (Bush 1, Clinton 1-2, Bush 1-2, Obama 1-2). Great again.
So the USA has changed its mind. Shame it didn't think about it more when they decided to get involved against a stable, moderate government and back a load of stone age fundamentalists, resulting in hundreds of thousands dead, refugees swamping Europe and parts of the middle east being ruled by brutal Jihadi nutcases.
So the USA has changed its mind. Shame it didn't think about it more when they decided to get involved against a stable, moderate government and back a load of stone age fundamentalists, resulting in hundreds of thousands dead, refugees swamping Europe and parts of the middle east being ruled by brutal Jihadi nutcases.
Thank goodness that 27 years of failed American presidencies and poor foreign policy choices have come to an end (Bush 1, Clinton 1-2, Bush 1-2, Obama 1-2). Great again.
It's not great yet.It will be soon with Kosovo as part of Serbia as it's been for hundreds of years.Time is fast aporoaching and you should fasten your belts.
"against a stable, moderate government"
(Andy UK, 31 March 2017 11:18)
LOL, Stable possibly, moderate no.
Under Hafez, Syria invaded Lebabon and during the 100day war he killed 100,000 (mostly Christians) and created another 300.000 refugees.
Under Bashar the government used machine guns on on unarmed and peaceful protestors and Syria had training camps and safehouses for terrorists including ISIS. The could travel to Iraq to set off car bombs, then return for R&R in Syria.
Since the war started? Mass executions and torture of prisoners, attacking civilian areas and enemies with sarin and chlorine, just last week all evidence points to the use of Chlorine gas on civilians by Assad.
Making Syrian President Bashar al-Assad leave power is not longer a priority of US foreign policy
BECAUSE ,they can not do it ,and failed )))
Had he not had Putin as a ally ,but USA/NATO ,he would have been gone ,like poor Saddam Hussein who had USA as ally against Iran in the 1980's found out the hard way.
How thinks has changed in world power strengths countries .
Soon the Red Dragon and the Big Bear will be ruling .
So the US has given up on removing Assad eh? or is it more like one of Aesop's fables about the fox and the grapes? http://www.aesopfables.com/cgi/aesop1.cgi?sel&TheFoxandtheGrapes2
So the USA has changed its mind. Shame it didn't think about it more when they decided to get involved against a stable, moderate government and back a load of stone age fundamentalists, resulting in hundreds of thousands dead, refugees swamping Europe and parts of the middle east being ruled by brutal Jihadi nutcases.
"against a stable, moderate government"
(Andy UK, 31 March 2017 11:18)
LOL, Stable possibly, moderate no.
Under Hafez, Syria invaded Lebabon and during the 100day war he killed 100,000 (mostly Christians) and created another 300.000 refugees.
Under Bashar the government used machine guns on on unarmed and peaceful protestors and Syria had training camps and safehouses for terrorists including ISIS. The could travel to Iraq to set off car bombs, then return for R&R in Syria.
Since the war started? Mass executions and torture of prisoners, attacking civilian areas and enemies with sarin and chlorine, just last week all evidence points to the use of Chlorine gas on civilians by Assad.
It's not great yet.It will be soon with Kosovo as part of Serbia as it's been for hundreds of years.Time is fast aporoaching and you should fasten your belts.
Thank goodness that 27 years of failed American presidencies and poor foreign policy choices have come to an end (Bush 1, Clinton 1-2, Bush 1-2, Obama 1-2). Great again.
Making Syrian President Bashar al-Assad leave power is not longer a priority of US foreign policy
BECAUSE ,they can not do it ,and failed )))
Had he not had Putin as a ally ,but USA/NATO ,he would have been gone ,like poor Saddam Hussein who had USA as ally against Iran in the 1980's found out the hard way.
How thinks has changed in world power strengths countries .
Soon the Red Dragon and the Big Bear will be ruling .
So the US has given up on removing Assad eh? or is it more like one of Aesop's fables about the fox and the grapes? http://www.aesopfables.com/cgi/aesop1.cgi?sel&TheFoxandtheGrapes2
IMAGE SOURCE
9 Komentari
Sortiraj po: