"Russian media influence risks making Serbia Moscow bureau"

No doubt that 99% of press in in hands of Russia and its satelites.

Take 92 as an example - each da there were at least 4-5 headlines from Putin's private life. On just B92 Putin was as twice more represented as President and Prime minister of Serbia together.

Take look at terrorist actions in Montenegro - virtually ALL Serbian media accused Montenegrin government. Even Prime minister Vucic is mute to speak about KGB and its role in organizing terror in Serbia and Montenegro.

It is sad - and some action has to be taken against Russian presence in the region.

Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation 
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 16:53) 



I did no such thing, but perhaps you could let me know what lies that the pentagon is telling about the incident
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 19:06)

---

The pentagon's most blatantly recognized false statement is that they were targeting hostile combatants. The truth is that no hostile actions ever emanated from that building, which was a protected civilian site. As soon as the gunship started bombing, the hospital contacted the US forces pleading for an immediate stop; in spite of the knowledge of these pleas, the US forces refused to cease fire, and the gunship knowingly continued the mass murder for a total of 30 minutes. The hospital was a treatment center for Taliban; the motive for the US premeditated, criminal attack was the liquidation of the Taliban and their treatment center. 


The biggest problem with any media influence is not when it is Russian or American, it is when it is lies and propoganda.
Sputnik and RT are both propoganda and could be called Kremlin TV 1 and Kremlin TV 2.
It has been obvious for a number of years how media works in this country, with large advertising spending and favourable tax decisions given to pro-government media.
Informer is the worst of them all, its employees could not be considered journalists.
B92 also obviously suffers from lack of money too, with many articles on the English site being 3rd hand articles with no fact-checking. B92 quotes an article from Tanjug that quoted a Reuters article that copied a Sputnik article

"The complete and utter failure of western media ....has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. "
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 10:32)

That's like not being entirely happy with your dentist, but instead of going to a different dentist, you ask a blind retarded monkey to fix your teeth.
If you are not happy with New York Times, perhaps you could lookup Insajder, krik, bellingcat, noodleremover etc. There are dozens of non-mainstream news sources that do good journalism without resorting to RT/Sputnik regurgitation of Kremlin press releases and nwo conspiracy theories.

"pre-meditated mass murder, whitewash, uncritical media, crime, mass murder... your choice of words leave no doubt that by "independent investigation" you mean one that finds US guilty of a war crime.

Recently the US govenment bombed a MSF hospital in Afghanistan, it was reported on and discussed and criticised in every western newspaper. Compare this to the recent Russian/Syrian attack on a UN convoy, there was no rational discussion of this in main Russian media.
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 09:57)

---

I've discussed this war crime on numerous occaissions. Not one western mainstream media outlet has called for an independent investigation of this pre-meditated mass murder. The pentagon's whitewash of this crime was parroted by an uncritical media. There was no critical, independent investigation or discussion of this crime in the west. Mass murder of innocent civilians this past week in Mosul by US bombs similarly has remain unreported in Western media.

"pre-meditated mass murder, whitewash, uncritical media, crime, mass murder... your choice of words leave no doubt that by "independent investigation" you mean one that finds US guilty of a war crime.
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 14:26)

---

My words describe the actions of the US military in the mass murder of defenceless doctors, nurses and unarmed patients. I have asked for an independent war crimes court to investigate this crime. Dwight, on the other hand, defends the western media that regurgitates the pentagon's lies and narrratives. Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation just like his darling western media and their pentagon parroting propagandists.

The complete and utter failure of western media to criticize US death and destruction in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and other condemned corners of the world, has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. Marija Sajkas probably still believes the New York Times published propaganda of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 06:51)


It is quite obvious that you do not read any of the "western media" that you harp on about. They are full of criticism for their own government both for actions and non-actions.
Recently the US govenment bombed a MSF hospital in Afghanistan, it was reported on and discussed and criticised in every western newspaper. Compare this to the recent Russian/Syrian attack on a UN convoy, there was no rational discussion of this in main Russian media.

The complete and utter failure of western media to criticize US death and destruction in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and other condemned corners of the world, has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. Marija Sajkas probably still believes the New York Times published propaganda of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 16:53)

I did no such thing, but perhaps you could let me know what lies that the pentagon is telling about the incident

"The hospital was a treatment center for Taliban; the motive for the US premeditated, criminal attack was the liquidation of the Taliban and their treatment center."
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 26 October 2016 15:38)

So you consider a treatment center for wounded Taliban terorists a 'civilian site'?

Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation 
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 16:53) 



I did no such thing, but perhaps you could let me know what lies that the pentagon is telling about the incident
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 19:06)

---

The pentagon's most blatantly recognized false statement is that they were targeting hostile combatants. The truth is that no hostile actions ever emanated from that building, which was a protected civilian site. As soon as the gunship started bombing, the hospital contacted the US forces pleading for an immediate stop; in spite of the knowledge of these pleas, the US forces refused to cease fire, and the gunship knowingly continued the mass murder for a total of 30 minutes. The hospital was a treatment center for Taliban; the motive for the US premeditated, criminal attack was the liquidation of the Taliban and their treatment center. 


"pre-meditated mass murder, whitewash, uncritical media, crime, mass murder... your choice of words leave no doubt that by "independent investigation" you mean one that finds US guilty of a war crime.
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 14:26)

---

My words describe the actions of the US military in the mass murder of defenceless doctors, nurses and unarmed patients. I have asked for an independent war crimes court to investigate this crime. Dwight, on the other hand, defends the western media that regurgitates the pentagon's lies and narrratives. Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation just like his darling western media and their pentagon parroting propagandists.

Recently the US govenment bombed a MSF hospital in Afghanistan, it was reported on and discussed and criticised in every western newspaper. Compare this to the recent Russian/Syrian attack on a UN convoy, there was no rational discussion of this in main Russian media.
(Dwight, 25 October 2016 09:57)

---

I've discussed this war crime on numerous occaissions. Not one western mainstream media outlet has called for an independent investigation of this pre-meditated mass murder. The pentagon's whitewash of this crime was parroted by an uncritical media. There was no critical, independent investigation or discussion of this crime in the west. Mass murder of innocent civilians this past week in Mosul by US bombs similarly has remain unreported in Western media.

No doubt that 99% of press in in hands of Russia and its satelites.

Take 92 as an example - each da there were at least 4-5 headlines from Putin's private life. On just B92 Putin was as twice more represented as President and Prime minister of Serbia together.

Take look at terrorist actions in Montenegro - virtually ALL Serbian media accused Montenegrin government. Even Prime minister Vucic is mute to speak about KGB and its role in organizing terror in Serbia and Montenegro.

It is sad - and some action has to be taken against Russian presence in the region.

The complete and utter failure of western media to criticize US death and destruction in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and other condemned corners of the world, has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. Marija Sajkas probably still believes the New York Times published propaganda of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The biggest problem with any media influence is not when it is Russian or American, it is when it is lies and propoganda.
Sputnik and RT are both propoganda and could be called Kremlin TV 1 and Kremlin TV 2.
It has been obvious for a number of years how media works in this country, with large advertising spending and favourable tax decisions given to pro-government media.
Informer is the worst of them all, its employees could not be considered journalists.
B92 also obviously suffers from lack of money too, with many articles on the English site being 3rd hand articles with no fact-checking. B92 quotes an article from Tanjug that quoted a Reuters article that copied a Sputnik article

The complete and utter failure of western media to criticize US death and destruction in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and other condemned corners of the world, has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. Marija Sajkas probably still believes the New York Times published propaganda of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 06:51)


It is quite obvious that you do not read any of the "western media" that you harp on about. They are full of criticism for their own government both for actions and non-actions.
Recently the US govenment bombed a MSF hospital in Afghanistan, it was reported on and discussed and criticised in every western newspaper. Compare this to the recent Russian/Syrian attack on a UN convoy, there was no rational discussion of this in main Russian media.

"The complete and utter failure of western media ....has forced people to seek more reliable sources of information. "
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 10:32)

That's like not being entirely happy with your dentist, but instead of going to a different dentist, you ask a blind retarded monkey to fix your teeth.
If you are not happy with New York Times, perhaps you could lookup Insajder, krik, bellingcat, noodleremover etc. There are dozens of non-mainstream news sources that do good journalism without resorting to RT/Sputnik regurgitation of Kremlin press releases and nwo conspiracy theories.

"pre-meditated mass murder, whitewash, uncritical media, crime, mass murder... your choice of words leave no doubt that by "independent investigation" you mean one that finds US guilty of a war crime.

Dwight dismisses calls for an independent war crime investigation
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 25 October 2016 16:53)

I did no such thing, but perhaps you could let me know what lies that the pentagon is telling about the incident

"The hospital was a treatment center for Taliban; the motive for the US premeditated, criminal attack was the liquidation of the Taliban and their treatment center."
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 26 October 2016 15:38)

So you consider a treatment center for wounded Taliban terorists a 'civilian site'?