"Bosniaks are repeating mistake Serbs made in Yugoslavia"

If Scotland can have aRedferndum on independence, and maybe even another, then why can't republika Srpska?

The Vikings were Slavs and in the mediaeval times Scotland was called Scotia or Scythia because it was part of the Great Horde also known as the Great Roman Empire and Mongol Tartaria. The Scottish flag is still the Andreevski Flag that you can see on all the Russian warships.
(rote, 21 October 2016 18:53)

OKEE DOKEE, rote can claim Scotland as integral part of Serbia!?

Some of these commentators’ talk is absolute nonsense when it comes to history. The Bosnian Serb Kingdom existed prior to Islam invading the 14th century Serbian Empire and 15th century Bosnian Serb Kingdom. The Bosnian Serb kingdom bordered Kosovo and Metohija. Some Serbs converted to Islam to make a living in the Islamic empire and to prevent having their young Christian boys kidnapped by the Islamic empire (Ottoman Turkish empire). Those Serbs have intermingled with the Turkish gene pool. That new mixed ethnicity is called Bosniak. The Bosniak population can be found in Raska area of Serbian and Montenegro (aka Sandzak to Bosniaks) that mainly border Kosovo and Metohija. The Bosnian border that existed in 15th century can be traced to the remaining Bosniak population in Serbia and Montenegro of today, which proves Bosnia bordered Kosovo and Metohija. Therefore, Serbia and Montenegro don’t border each other. However, all these Serb lands and ruling districts have always changed in the past 1.5 millenniums. Bosnian Serbs were once a part of Serbia. To say a Bosnian Serb state only existed for the past 20 years is not true. Serbs arrived in the 6th century in Bosnia. They most likely crossed into Bosnia over the two rivers bare foot (the U.S. military would fully understand why, after they got stuck in the muddy river banks of the Sava in 1996. They were sitting and stuck ducks.) Bosnian Serbs are the indigenous population.

"If Scotland can have aRedferndum on independence, and maybe even another, then why can't republika Srpska?
(Hypocrites !, 21 October 2016 15:47) "

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years, RS has a history of barely 20 years and has never been independent. It's only claim to fame is being born on the back of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Also Scotland can only have a referendum if GB allows them to. So sure, if the rest of BiH allows it, then they can. But that won't happen.

Everyone in the Balkans is making the same mistakes that they did in the past. From an outsider's view, I often just have to laugh when I hear one ethnic group trying to act better than another. You're all making mistakes of the past and don't seem to have learned from it. Everywhere in the Balkans, war criminals are celebrated as heroes, people keep voting for the same corrupt and criminal politicians(most of whom are from the past), and there's never been any kind of true reconciliation.

What he said means Serbia is to blame for the destruction of Yugoslavia. I think all republics, plus republic of Kosovo should sue Serbia based on what Dodik said.

Islam is a terrible, terrible thing.

And Again Serbs Destabilizes the Balkans

lk...
ok so bih needs to allow to referendum
gb needed to allow the referendum
yugo wasn't given that same respect was it. did it allow the bih referendum, in the way you say is required?
yet you continue to show respect for that, by your own view point, illegal referendum's results -- by the way, if you recall, that referendum had a very significant portion of bosnians (yes those that live in that country) who abstained from voting -- yet again you hold its results as fair.
not sure any longer whether or not your opinion is without obvious bias.

so give me a reason that doesn't imply some form of bosnian uniquness, some one-off case that cannot be found anywhere else. give us something that is balanced.

Even Dodik speaks like a traitor now?
Serbs` mistake during `90ies? We all thought it were those nazi-S;ovenes, Ustashi-Croats, terrorist-Bosniaks and harvest-organs-drug-trafficers-Albanians backed by the United Satans. Now it`s Serbs` mistake?

Anyway, killing tens of thousands of innocent people all over ex-Yugoslavia is a "mistake" according to Dodik. Good boy.

READ the Dayton accords..Dodic can't leave without US blessings and other country's who signed as well.
(Nikola, 23 October 2016 23:19)
The sands are shifting and unless you have been sleeping up until now RS recently held a referendum without the approval blessing or anything else from the US despite the Washington windbags blowing hot air over the issue.
The Dayton accord is only a means to an end to Bosnia.
Note not a peep following that referendum from the Washington windbags or EU.
That referendum was mostly aimed at declaring no confidence at the BiH judicial system, which is a devastating blow to BiH. Now the Bosniaks, who control the judiciary, are investigating the public prosecutor on the ground that he stopped an investigation into Dodik – its laughable.
The power of supporters of a failed state like Bosnia are dwindling and thus it will be torn apart. Why even the Croats are running to Dodik and Belgrade. Personally I’d push them into the Neretva and let them drown.

A clever argument indeed.

Arn.Sweden.

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years, RS has a history of barely 20 years and has never been independent.
(LK, 21 October 2016 16:06)

Read some history before flapping your mouth, start with thh Kotromanic dynasty and then King Tvrtko which was a mix of Serbian and Croatian nobles.

The solvency of the US can only be proven when using an Albanian calculator, which our resident AI has plenty LOL. Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

No sj, you did not understand what icj1 is saying! Let me try to simplify it for you: he is pointing out the contradictions in your posts. The fact that what you say today, you deny tomorrow, by saying something completely different. He does this thing by quoting your earlier posts and comparing them to show the absurdities.

The other thing that he does is by often taking your metaphors, like "Euro Trees" and giving them a literal meaning. I agree that is not correct but, truth be told, a lot of you Serb posters here use metaphors. Whether you do this because you think you are great poets, or because you can change the meaning later (it is easy to do this with metaphors), it just keeps your discourses vague and confused. So, I think icj1 is trying, in his own way, to influence you to not use metaphors but solid unambiguous language. Alas, I am afraid it is a lost battle :).

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years …
(LK, 21 October 2016 16:06)

The Vikings were Slavs and in the mediaeval times Scotland was called Scotia or Scythia because it was part of the Great Horde also known as the Great Roman Empire and Mongol Tartaria. The Scottish flag is still the Andreevski Flag that you can see on all the Russian warships.

@The Truth:

Not that I'm defending Rote but why do you advise him or her (even if you're being sarcastic) to claim Scotland as a part of Serbia?? I don't follow you or I don't understand what you are getting at.

truth : rote can claim Scotland as integral part of Serbia!?

Balkans and Britain were provinces of the Great Mongol-Tartar-Roman Horde before the 17 century. More than that after 1613 when the P-russian Sobakini-Yurievi later known as the Romanovs arranged a coup in the newly built capitol of Moscow all peoples of the Balkans were lucky to find shelter in the Ottoman Empire called the Great P-Orda. It saved you all from the Catholic terror, the Inquisition, the Reformation the Renaissance, the multiple wars and other horrors of Europe. Scottish and Ireland Slavs were less happy you know. Besides the Irish were the only white skin slaves sold to America and Europe and shown in the zoos …

First nations on the earth appeared in Europe in 17 century and those were artificially made nations the German tribes, the Halles, the Austrians, the Swiss, the Italians, the Swedes … while many (Spain, Goth-Alanians aka Catalan, Portuguese, Medici House …) were against dividing peoples. That’s why kings like Phillip II of Spain is called bad in the western history. That’s why the Cathar Bogoniles were massacred all over Europe in 17 century - not in 13 as they persuade us.

Serbs and all other Slavs of the Balkans were called BULGARS while the province was called ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО БУЛГАРСКОЕ = ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО ВОЛЖСКОЕ. Meanwhile the British islands were marked in the titles of the Tsars as ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО КЕНТИЙСКОЕ.

Indigenous Serb

No state had ever existed before 17 century. You will not find a document disaproving it. Maximum you can find is a copy of a copy. The original ones were either destroyed or had never existed at all. Thus there’s no evidence of a state on the Balkans including Romania, Greece, Moldova or Hungary or any other. All your histories are just fake stories of the 19 century or adopted episodes of the history of the single state that ruled the whole world. It was headed by the Rurikovici Dynasty that only formally was Rus dynasty. In fact they took roots from the Byzantine Aeneas or emperor August as they called him. He was brother in law of Andronicus I Komnin whom after his death the Greeks called Crucified (Christ) Prophet (Jesus).

https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%98%D0%B0

From the very beginning in Christianity there existed several directions that in 16-17 centuries formed Orthodox (original), Catholic (autonomus), Islam (Kazan-Ryazan version of the Orthodox Christianity), Buddhism (version of the first aka Pagan Christianity), Judaism (Christianity without Christ). Then further division happened in Each branch. The Catholics who broke away first (late 16 century) were divided for the Protestants and the Catholics. Islam that broke away in 17 century was divided for the Sunni (Ottomans) and the Shiia (Iran). The pagans were divided for the Buddhists, Hinduists and the Krishna (= Christ). Several sects appeared among the Judaists.

Why would the approval, blessing or anything else from the US matter?! According to the CE of B92 forums sj the US has collapsed long ago and what matters is the approval of China :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist
(icj1, 24 October 2016 16:08)

The solvency of the US can only be proven when using an Albanian calculator, which our resident AI has plenty LOL. Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.

(Reader, 25 October 2016 19:56)

Using metaphors is how you try and get a point across to simple people who actually think that somewhere out there is a limitless supply of money. It much like the question of a Kosovo army. Since an army is very expensive the first question I ask is how is it being funded? You should have read some of the posts; they were laughable. It simply got down to planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees to fund this army.
So far the Albanians that have posted on B92 have no idea about finance. The closest they have come to that is an auto teller machine. How many would know about the International Settlement Bank? Or perhaps someone that works there? Not one.

RS recently held a referendum without the approval blessing or anything else from the US
(sj, 24 October 2016 10:29)

Why would the approval, blessing or anything else from the US matter?! According to the CE of B92 forums sj the US has collapsed long ago and what matters is the approval of China :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

Give Dodik credit, he is a sly fox.

After 20 years, admitting Serbs made "mistakes" in the 90's, wow you think?
This statement after the controversial referendum in RS, what a coincidence!
Another stunt to undermine Bosnia as an independent state; he is a Bosnia troll.
The "west" underestimates him.

Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

Of course, since the CE of B92 forums sj commands that Euros can grow on trees, it is the duty of every living organism (whether he, she or it) to make that a reality :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

Of course, since the CE of B92 forums sj commands that Euros can grow on trees, it is the duty of every living organism (whether he, she or it) to make that a reality :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

You should have read some of the posts; they were laughable. It simply got down to planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees to fund this army.
(sj, 26 October 2016 11:06)

You must be referring to the posts of the CE of B92 forums sj because they are the only posts written in these forums to propose planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees :)

That said, I disagree that those posts by the CE of B92 forums sj are laughable since no other economist has come up before with this revolutionary idea of planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees. Only a brilliant economist like the CE of B92 forums sj can come up with such innovations.

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

READ the Dayton accords..Dodic can't leave without US blessings and other country's who signed as well.

"If Scotland can have aRedferndum on independence, and maybe even another, then why can't republika Srpska?
(Hypocrites !, 21 October 2016 15:47) "

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years, RS has a history of barely 20 years and has never been independent. It's only claim to fame is being born on the back of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Also Scotland can only have a referendum if GB allows them to. So sure, if the rest of BiH allows it, then they can. But that won't happen.

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years …
(LK, 21 October 2016 16:06)

The Vikings were Slavs and in the mediaeval times Scotland was called Scotia or Scythia because it was part of the Great Horde also known as the Great Roman Empire and Mongol Tartaria. The Scottish flag is still the Andreevski Flag that you can see on all the Russian warships.

Some of these commentators’ talk is absolute nonsense when it comes to history. The Bosnian Serb Kingdom existed prior to Islam invading the 14th century Serbian Empire and 15th century Bosnian Serb Kingdom. The Bosnian Serb kingdom bordered Kosovo and Metohija. Some Serbs converted to Islam to make a living in the Islamic empire and to prevent having their young Christian boys kidnapped by the Islamic empire (Ottoman Turkish empire). Those Serbs have intermingled with the Turkish gene pool. That new mixed ethnicity is called Bosniak. The Bosniak population can be found in Raska area of Serbian and Montenegro (aka Sandzak to Bosniaks) that mainly border Kosovo and Metohija. The Bosnian border that existed in 15th century can be traced to the remaining Bosniak population in Serbia and Montenegro of today, which proves Bosnia bordered Kosovo and Metohija. Therefore, Serbia and Montenegro don’t border each other. However, all these Serb lands and ruling districts have always changed in the past 1.5 millenniums. Bosnian Serbs were once a part of Serbia. To say a Bosnian Serb state only existed for the past 20 years is not true. Serbs arrived in the 6th century in Bosnia. They most likely crossed into Bosnia over the two rivers bare foot (the U.S. military would fully understand why, after they got stuck in the muddy river banks of the Sava in 1996. They were sitting and stuck ducks.) Bosnian Serbs are the indigenous population.

And Again Serbs Destabilizes the Balkans

If Scotland can have aRedferndum on independence, and maybe even another, then why can't republika Srpska?

Indigenous Serb

No state had ever existed before 17 century. You will not find a document disaproving it. Maximum you can find is a copy of a copy. The original ones were either destroyed or had never existed at all. Thus there’s no evidence of a state on the Balkans including Romania, Greece, Moldova or Hungary or any other. All your histories are just fake stories of the 19 century or adopted episodes of the history of the single state that ruled the whole world. It was headed by the Rurikovici Dynasty that only formally was Rus dynasty. In fact they took roots from the Byzantine Aeneas or emperor August as they called him. He was brother in law of Andronicus I Komnin whom after his death the Greeks called Crucified (Christ) Prophet (Jesus).

https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%98%D0%B0

From the very beginning in Christianity there existed several directions that in 16-17 centuries formed Orthodox (original), Catholic (autonomus), Islam (Kazan-Ryazan version of the Orthodox Christianity), Buddhism (version of the first aka Pagan Christianity), Judaism (Christianity without Christ). Then further division happened in Each branch. The Catholics who broke away first (late 16 century) were divided for the Protestants and the Catholics. Islam that broke away in 17 century was divided for the Sunni (Ottomans) and the Shiia (Iran). The pagans were divided for the Buddhists, Hinduists and the Krishna (= Christ). Several sects appeared among the Judaists.

What he said means Serbia is to blame for the destruction of Yugoslavia. I think all republics, plus republic of Kosovo should sue Serbia based on what Dodik said.

Islam is a terrible, terrible thing.

The Vikings were Slavs and in the mediaeval times Scotland was called Scotia or Scythia because it was part of the Great Horde also known as the Great Roman Empire and Mongol Tartaria. The Scottish flag is still the Andreevski Flag that you can see on all the Russian warships.
(rote, 21 October 2016 18:53)

OKEE DOKEE, rote can claim Scotland as integral part of Serbia!?

truth : rote can claim Scotland as integral part of Serbia!?

Balkans and Britain were provinces of the Great Mongol-Tartar-Roman Horde before the 17 century. More than that after 1613 when the P-russian Sobakini-Yurievi later known as the Romanovs arranged a coup in the newly built capitol of Moscow all peoples of the Balkans were lucky to find shelter in the Ottoman Empire called the Great P-Orda. It saved you all from the Catholic terror, the Inquisition, the Reformation the Renaissance, the multiple wars and other horrors of Europe. Scottish and Ireland Slavs were less happy you know. Besides the Irish were the only white skin slaves sold to America and Europe and shown in the zoos …

First nations on the earth appeared in Europe in 17 century and those were artificially made nations the German tribes, the Halles, the Austrians, the Swiss, the Italians, the Swedes … while many (Spain, Goth-Alanians aka Catalan, Portuguese, Medici House …) were against dividing peoples. That’s why kings like Phillip II of Spain is called bad in the western history. That’s why the Cathar Bogoniles were massacred all over Europe in 17 century - not in 13 as they persuade us.

Serbs and all other Slavs of the Balkans were called BULGARS while the province was called ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО БУЛГАРСКОЕ = ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО ВОЛЖСКОЕ. Meanwhile the British islands were marked in the titles of the Tsars as ВЕЛИКОЕ КНЯЖЕСТВО КЕНТИЙСКОЕ.

Everyone in the Balkans is making the same mistakes that they did in the past. From an outsider's view, I often just have to laugh when I hear one ethnic group trying to act better than another. You're all making mistakes of the past and don't seem to have learned from it. Everywhere in the Balkans, war criminals are celebrated as heroes, people keep voting for the same corrupt and criminal politicians(most of whom are from the past), and there's never been any kind of true reconciliation.

READ the Dayton accords..Dodic can't leave without US blessings and other country's who signed as well.

READ the Dayton accords..Dodic can't leave without US blessings and other country's who signed as well.
(Nikola, 23 October 2016 23:19)
The sands are shifting and unless you have been sleeping up until now RS recently held a referendum without the approval blessing or anything else from the US despite the Washington windbags blowing hot air over the issue.
The Dayton accord is only a means to an end to Bosnia.
Note not a peep following that referendum from the Washington windbags or EU.
That referendum was mostly aimed at declaring no confidence at the BiH judicial system, which is a devastating blow to BiH. Now the Bosniaks, who control the judiciary, are investigating the public prosecutor on the ground that he stopped an investigation into Dodik – its laughable.
The power of supporters of a failed state like Bosnia are dwindling and thus it will be torn apart. Why even the Croats are running to Dodik and Belgrade. Personally I’d push them into the Neretva and let them drown.

RS recently held a referendum without the approval blessing or anything else from the US
(sj, 24 October 2016 10:29)

Why would the approval, blessing or anything else from the US matter?! According to the CE of B92 forums sj the US has collapsed long ago and what matters is the approval of China :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

Scotland has a long history of being an independent state going back hundreds of years, RS has a history of barely 20 years and has never been independent.
(LK, 21 October 2016 16:06)

Read some history before flapping your mouth, start with thh Kotromanic dynasty and then King Tvrtko which was a mix of Serbian and Croatian nobles.

Give Dodik credit, he is a sly fox.

After 20 years, admitting Serbs made "mistakes" in the 90's, wow you think?
This statement after the controversial referendum in RS, what a coincidence!
Another stunt to undermine Bosnia as an independent state; he is a Bosnia troll.
The "west" underestimates him.

@The Truth:

Not that I'm defending Rote but why do you advise him or her (even if you're being sarcastic) to claim Scotland as a part of Serbia?? I don't follow you or I don't understand what you are getting at.

A clever argument indeed.

Arn.Sweden.

Even Dodik speaks like a traitor now?
Serbs` mistake during `90ies? We all thought it were those nazi-S;ovenes, Ustashi-Croats, terrorist-Bosniaks and harvest-organs-drug-trafficers-Albanians backed by the United Satans. Now it`s Serbs` mistake?

Anyway, killing tens of thousands of innocent people all over ex-Yugoslavia is a "mistake" according to Dodik. Good boy.

Why would the approval, blessing or anything else from the US matter?! According to the CE of B92 forums sj the US has collapsed long ago and what matters is the approval of China :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist
(icj1, 24 October 2016 16:08)

The solvency of the US can only be proven when using an Albanian calculator, which our resident AI has plenty LOL. Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.

You should have read some of the posts; they were laughable. It simply got down to planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees to fund this army.
(sj, 26 October 2016 11:06)

You must be referring to the posts of the CE of B92 forums sj because they are the only posts written in these forums to propose planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees :)

That said, I disagree that those posts by the CE of B92 forums sj are laughable since no other economist has come up before with this revolutionary idea of planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees. Only a brilliant economist like the CE of B92 forums sj can come up with such innovations.

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

lk...
ok so bih needs to allow to referendum
gb needed to allow the referendum
yugo wasn't given that same respect was it. did it allow the bih referendum, in the way you say is required?
yet you continue to show respect for that, by your own view point, illegal referendum's results -- by the way, if you recall, that referendum had a very significant portion of bosnians (yes those that live in that country) who abstained from voting -- yet again you hold its results as fair.
not sure any longer whether or not your opinion is without obvious bias.

so give me a reason that doesn't imply some form of bosnian uniquness, some one-off case that cannot be found anywhere else. give us something that is balanced.

Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

Of course, since the CE of B92 forums sj commands that Euros can grow on trees, it is the duty of every living organism (whether he, she or it) to make that a reality :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

Of course, since the CE of B92 forums sj commands that Euros can grow on trees, it is the duty of every living organism (whether he, she or it) to make that a reality :)

P.S. CE = Chief Economist

(Reader, 25 October 2016 19:56)

Using metaphors is how you try and get a point across to simple people who actually think that somewhere out there is a limitless supply of money. It much like the question of a Kosovo army. Since an army is very expensive the first question I ask is how is it being funded? You should have read some of the posts; they were laughable. It simply got down to planting, nurturing and harvesting money trees to fund this army.
So far the Albanians that have posted on B92 have no idea about finance. The closest they have come to that is an auto teller machine. How many would know about the International Settlement Bank? Or perhaps someone that works there? Not one.

The solvency of the US can only be proven when using an Albanian calculator, which our resident AI has plenty LOL. Perhas he/she/it can show Thaci how to grow those Euros trees LOL.
(sj, 25 October 2016 07:50)

No sj, you did not understand what icj1 is saying! Let me try to simplify it for you: he is pointing out the contradictions in your posts. The fact that what you say today, you deny tomorrow, by saying something completely different. He does this thing by quoting your earlier posts and comparing them to show the absurdities.

The other thing that he does is by often taking your metaphors, like "Euro Trees" and giving them a literal meaning. I agree that is not correct but, truth be told, a lot of you Serb posters here use metaphors. Whether you do this because you think you are great poets, or because you can change the meaning later (it is easy to do this with metaphors), it just keeps your discourses vague and confused. So, I think icj1 is trying, in his own way, to influence you to not use metaphors but solid unambiguous language. Alas, I am afraid it is a lost battle :).