When Iran gets nuclear weapons, it will use them, right away, most likely on some neighbor. Probably not Israel, because Israel would turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot.
@guest
i find it more than just a bit disheartening that you so casually play off the potential of nuclear war. to not be scared of what the us might do with its nuclear arsenal is rather foolish and immature. there are no winners in nuclear fallout, no matter what you have been led to believe. the fallout from fukashima is still very live and active in the whole world's environment, as is the fallout from chernobyl. these were accidents and they'll haunt huimainty for generations to come. what we're talking about now is the very real threat of intended nuclear detonations. we have on one had a nation that has openly made claim that it has the "right" (as if there were such a thing to have) to use preemptive nuclear weapons, that it has the right to use them at all on other humans. we have a side that continues props up the mythology that atomic weapons were needed to bring an end to world war 2. we have a side that has inched to the borders of another and then tries to cry-bully their way into convincing everybody else that it is not the side that is moving its forces and arsenal to the others border that is acting in an aggressive provocative manner, but that it is the side that is staying at home, defending its own borders.
to believe that the russians are the only ones afraid of such an event brings about the question if you're wise or old enough to offer any substantial comments or substance to any discussion with adults.
4,000 troops is pure nonsense, try 400,000, but watch the United States of Piss and Wind back peddle if it gets too hot.
As I said before the NATO summit involved 3 Michelin star meals with some of the best wines in Europe and what change was left over went towards deploying the 4,000.
Nuclear detenation, it's not a question of if, it is a matter of who, when and where?
It will happen, sooner than many think! Will it be accidental or on purpose?
Lets suppose one is detonated in any major city of the USA, how would that affect the world economy? How would the rest of the USA react if a amjor catostropic even like this would occure on home ground territory? USA has been pushing the buttons for quite some time now, pretty much no war zones internal to it's territorial boundries but what would happen if? Russia on the other hand has been internally subjected to the horror of devistating war, just look at the period during World War Two when more than twenty million Russian people perished! Russia for centuries has chewed up all the bad time and spit it all back on to Satans face but how about the USA, are they that vigilent? The USA is huffing and puffing but the game is going to catch up sooner or later, probably much sooner that any one imagines!!!
4,000 troops is pure nonsense, try 400,000, but watch the United States of Piss and Wind back peddle if it gets too hot.
As I said before the NATO summit involved 3 Michelin star meals with some of the best wines in Europe and what change was left over went towards deploying the 4,000.
Nuclear detenation, it's not a question of if, it is a matter of who, when and where?
It will happen, sooner than many think! Will it be accidental or on purpose?
Lets suppose one is detonated in any major city of the USA, how would that affect the world economy? How would the rest of the USA react if a amjor catostropic even like this would occure on home ground territory? USA has been pushing the buttons for quite some time now, pretty much no war zones internal to it's territorial boundries but what would happen if? Russia on the other hand has been internally subjected to the horror of devistating war, just look at the period during World War Two when more than twenty million Russian people perished! Russia for centuries has chewed up all the bad time and spit it all back on to Satans face but how about the USA, are they that vigilent? The USA is huffing and puffing but the game is going to catch up sooner or later, probably much sooner that any one imagines!!!
@guest
i find it more than just a bit disheartening that you so casually play off the potential of nuclear war. to not be scared of what the us might do with its nuclear arsenal is rather foolish and immature. there are no winners in nuclear fallout, no matter what you have been led to believe. the fallout from fukashima is still very live and active in the whole world's environment, as is the fallout from chernobyl. these were accidents and they'll haunt huimainty for generations to come. what we're talking about now is the very real threat of intended nuclear detonations. we have on one had a nation that has openly made claim that it has the "right" (as if there were such a thing to have) to use preemptive nuclear weapons, that it has the right to use them at all on other humans. we have a side that continues props up the mythology that atomic weapons were needed to bring an end to world war 2. we have a side that has inched to the borders of another and then tries to cry-bully their way into convincing everybody else that it is not the side that is moving its forces and arsenal to the others border that is acting in an aggressive provocative manner, but that it is the side that is staying at home, defending its own borders.
to believe that the russians are the only ones afraid of such an event brings about the question if you're wise or old enough to offer any substantial comments or substance to any discussion with adults.
When Iran gets nuclear weapons, it will use them, right away, most likely on some neighbor. Probably not Israel, because Israel would turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot.
Nuclear detenation, it's not a question of if, it is a matter of who, when and where?
It will happen, sooner than many think! Will it be accidental or on purpose?
Lets suppose one is detonated in any major city of the USA, how would that affect the world economy? How would the rest of the USA react if a amjor catostropic even like this would occure on home ground territory? USA has been pushing the buttons for quite some time now, pretty much no war zones internal to it's territorial boundries but what would happen if? Russia on the other hand has been internally subjected to the horror of devistating war, just look at the period during World War Two when more than twenty million Russian people perished! Russia for centuries has chewed up all the bad time and spit it all back on to Satans face but how about the USA, are they that vigilent? The USA is huffing and puffing but the game is going to catch up sooner or later, probably much sooner that any one imagines!!!
4,000 troops is pure nonsense, try 400,000, but watch the United States of Piss and Wind back peddle if it gets too hot.
As I said before the NATO summit involved 3 Michelin star meals with some of the best wines in Europe and what change was left over went towards deploying the 4,000.
When Iran gets nuclear weapons, it will use them, right away, most likely on some neighbor. Probably not Israel, because Israel would turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot.
@guest
i find it more than just a bit disheartening that you so casually play off the potential of nuclear war. to not be scared of what the us might do with its nuclear arsenal is rather foolish and immature. there are no winners in nuclear fallout, no matter what you have been led to believe. the fallout from fukashima is still very live and active in the whole world's environment, as is the fallout from chernobyl. these were accidents and they'll haunt huimainty for generations to come. what we're talking about now is the very real threat of intended nuclear detonations. we have on one had a nation that has openly made claim that it has the "right" (as if there were such a thing to have) to use preemptive nuclear weapons, that it has the right to use them at all on other humans. we have a side that continues props up the mythology that atomic weapons were needed to bring an end to world war 2. we have a side that has inched to the borders of another and then tries to cry-bully their way into convincing everybody else that it is not the side that is moving its forces and arsenal to the others border that is acting in an aggressive provocative manner, but that it is the side that is staying at home, defending its own borders.
to believe that the russians are the only ones afraid of such an event brings about the question if you're wise or old enough to offer any substantial comments or substance to any discussion with adults.
IMAGE SOURCE
6 Komentari
Sortiraj po: