British stave off Russian transport planes' "aggression"

Russian Aggression.....3 cargo planes....There must be something seriously wrong with Britain if 3 cargo planes constitute aggression. Hate to see if it was a warplane then it would be considered an act of war.....The west is really in a dilemma and a sad state of affairs

Great reporting and professional journalism, B92.

Headline: "Russian transport planes"
Title: "... three Russian transport aircraft"
Article itself: "...the Russian military transport aircraft..."

No more to say

(Comm. Parrisson, 13 May 2016 12:00)
Great reporting and professional journalism, B92.

Headline: "Russian transport planes"
Title: "... three Russian transport aircraft"
Article itself: "...the Russian military transport aircraft..."

No more to say

---

The only mistake was B92 ambiguous wording. Reuter's original wording is: ."...the Russian military aircraft were not responsive..." aircraft may be used for the singular or plural.

The more apparent issue is that Reuters consider IL76 and An26 aircraft as "aggressive" and simply regurgitates propaganda.

The question is why should B92 choose to parrot such rubbish?

"The only mistake was B92 ambiguous wording. Reuter's original wording is: ."...the Russian military aircraft were not responsive..." aircraft may be used for the singular or plural. "

(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 13 May 2016 14:41)

You didn't get my point. Deliberately? If not, then I have to say more: Why does the headline talks about 'transport planes' (== i.e. suggesting that it have been some (civil) freight planes) when it was clear that it was some military transport aircrafts? And more interesting to read would have been what these aircraft were heading for, when the article quotes they were 'approaching' Baltic countries?

Great reporting and professional journalism, B92.

Headline: "Russian transport planes"
Title: "... three Russian transport aircraft"
Article itself: "...the Russian military transport aircraft..."

No more to say

Russian Aggression.....3 cargo planes....There must be something seriously wrong with Britain if 3 cargo planes constitute aggression. Hate to see if it was a warplane then it would be considered an act of war.....The west is really in a dilemma and a sad state of affairs

(Comm. Parrisson, 13 May 2016 12:00)
Great reporting and professional journalism, B92.

Headline: "Russian transport planes"
Title: "... three Russian transport aircraft"
Article itself: "...the Russian military transport aircraft..."

No more to say

---

The only mistake was B92 ambiguous wording. Reuter's original wording is: ."...the Russian military aircraft were not responsive..." aircraft may be used for the singular or plural.

The more apparent issue is that Reuters consider IL76 and An26 aircraft as "aggressive" and simply regurgitates propaganda.

The question is why should B92 choose to parrot such rubbish?

"The only mistake was B92 ambiguous wording. Reuter's original wording is: ."...the Russian military aircraft were not responsive..." aircraft may be used for the singular or plural. "

(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 13 May 2016 14:41)

You didn't get my point. Deliberately? If not, then I have to say more: Why does the headline talks about 'transport planes' (== i.e. suggesting that it have been some (civil) freight planes) when it was clear that it was some military transport aircrafts? And more interesting to read would have been what these aircraft were heading for, when the article quotes they were 'approaching' Baltic countries?