12

Thursday, 12.05.2016.

16:03

Kremlin considers NATO's missile shield "direct threat"

NATO's missile defense shield that went online in Romania represents a direct threat to Russia's security, the Kremlin has announced.

Izvor: B92

Kremlin considers NATO's missile shield "direct threat" IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

12 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

icj1

pre 7 godina

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

You are so ignorant, mate. These missiles don't carry warheads so there is nothing for Russia to respond too. So, that you understand, they don't carry anything that explodes :) They work by hitting another missile and destroying it because of the speed of the impact. That's it. You are listening too much of Kremlin's propaganda mate - that's intended for internal consumption in Russia, not for you lol
----------

That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

The Soviet Union put offensive missiles in Cuba that carried nuclear warheads which could destroy any American city within minutes. Again you are just showing how ignorant you are by not understanding the difference between a missile that carries a nuclear warhead and a missile that does not carry any warhead at all (not even a warhead with conventional explosives). You don't need to be a four-star general to understand such a simple thing!

rote

pre 7 godina

Observer : Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history.

Most often I do not have intension to leave a comment here but always there are idiot apes wHo spoil everything. What planet are you living on? What downward spiral are you talking about? Is it an open door day in your mad house? МУДАК ТАКАЯ!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIbNk_GnPvg

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.
(observer, 13 May 2016 00:23) # Co

I think,you will find that USA is going broke right now!.The result(18 Trillion dollar debt) of involvement in too many countries, and not worrying,or fix their economy!

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond,compared to before,when missiles where in France,Germany and Britian.Now the missiles shield will be 500 km away ,compared to 3000 km.
That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.

sj

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:25)
It’s a play on words since an AK 47 or M16 can also be said to be “defensive”. However, let’s look at this scenario; the Russians bring in their jamming equipment into that part of Moldovia they control and switch it on and it can cover up to 600 kilometres – result no communications, airflights or anything electronic working in nearly ½ of Europe.
What are the United States of Piss and Wind going to do then?
Its ruse or PR exercise for people in the US, nothing more. You may recall late last year the US sent in the USS Lassen into the disputed waters near the man-made islands in the South China Sea?
Yes it went close to 12 mile zone, but its helicopters (two Blackhawks) were non-operational and on deck and the main radar system was switched off. This is standard international procedure when entering another nation’s territorial waters.

observer

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.

Paul

pre 7 godina

What is the harm of "defensive weapons"? Defensive weapons also let you launch aggression with impunity. Bullet proof vests can be used in terrorist attacks.

And of course a missile launcher can be used to launch missiles for any reason, defensive or aggressive.

Questioner

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?

rote

pre 7 godina

Azir : Kosova, Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!


Only such people still do not get that the Americans are turning Europe into a battlefield. Air defense systems are the first targets in a modern war. So best for you is to sit quiet on your tree while the elephants quarrel below. Just do not attract attention to survive. Never forget that Russian missiles of all types are much better than the US made ones so the America will not save you. To say nothing that Russia is not an enemy to the Shqiptars. We have only a territorial issue to be solved but it does not mean wiping you off the surface.

LK

pre 7 godina

Kosova,Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!
(Azir, 12 May 2016 16:21)

Russian terrorism. Most Slavs don't want to be associated with Russians. Only some Serb nationalists and radicals who live in the past do. That's why Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Croatia, Slovenia, and Bulgaria are part of NATO and want very little to do with Russia.

rote

pre 7 godina

Azir : Kosova, Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!


Only such people still do not get that the Americans are turning Europe into a battlefield. Air defense systems are the first targets in a modern war. So best for you is to sit quiet on your tree while the elephants quarrel below. Just do not attract attention to survive. Never forget that Russian missiles of all types are much better than the US made ones so the America will not save you. To say nothing that Russia is not an enemy to the Shqiptars. We have only a territorial issue to be solved but it does not mean wiping you off the surface.

LK

pre 7 godina

Kosova,Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!
(Azir, 12 May 2016 16:21)

Russian terrorism. Most Slavs don't want to be associated with Russians. Only some Serb nationalists and radicals who live in the past do. That's why Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Croatia, Slovenia, and Bulgaria are part of NATO and want very little to do with Russia.

Questioner

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?

Paul

pre 7 godina

What is the harm of "defensive weapons"? Defensive weapons also let you launch aggression with impunity. Bullet proof vests can be used in terrorist attacks.

And of course a missile launcher can be used to launch missiles for any reason, defensive or aggressive.

observer

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.

sj

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:25)
It’s a play on words since an AK 47 or M16 can also be said to be “defensive”. However, let’s look at this scenario; the Russians bring in their jamming equipment into that part of Moldovia they control and switch it on and it can cover up to 600 kilometres – result no communications, airflights or anything electronic working in nearly ½ of Europe.
What are the United States of Piss and Wind going to do then?
Its ruse or PR exercise for people in the US, nothing more. You may recall late last year the US sent in the USS Lassen into the disputed waters near the man-made islands in the South China Sea?
Yes it went close to 12 mile zone, but its helicopters (two Blackhawks) were non-operational and on deck and the main radar system was switched off. This is standard international procedure when entering another nation’s territorial waters.

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond,compared to before,when missiles where in France,Germany and Britian.Now the missiles shield will be 500 km away ,compared to 3000 km.
That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.
(observer, 13 May 2016 00:23) # Co

I think,you will find that USA is going broke right now!.The result(18 Trillion dollar debt) of involvement in too many countries, and not worrying,or fix their economy!

rote

pre 7 godina

Observer : Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history.

Most often I do not have intension to leave a comment here but always there are idiot apes wHo spoil everything. What planet are you living on? What downward spiral are you talking about? Is it an open door day in your mad house? МУДАК ТАКАЯ!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIbNk_GnPvg

icj1

pre 7 godina

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

You are so ignorant, mate. These missiles don't carry warheads so there is nothing for Russia to respond too. So, that you understand, they don't carry anything that explodes :) They work by hitting another missile and destroying it because of the speed of the impact. That's it. You are listening too much of Kremlin's propaganda mate - that's intended for internal consumption in Russia, not for you lol
----------

That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

The Soviet Union put offensive missiles in Cuba that carried nuclear warheads which could destroy any American city within minutes. Again you are just showing how ignorant you are by not understanding the difference between a missile that carries a nuclear warhead and a missile that does not carry any warhead at all (not even a warhead with conventional explosives). You don't need to be a four-star general to understand such a simple thing!

rote

pre 7 godina

Azir : Kosova, Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!


Only such people still do not get that the Americans are turning Europe into a battlefield. Air defense systems are the first targets in a modern war. So best for you is to sit quiet on your tree while the elephants quarrel below. Just do not attract attention to survive. Never forget that Russian missiles of all types are much better than the US made ones so the America will not save you. To say nothing that Russia is not an enemy to the Shqiptars. We have only a territorial issue to be solved but it does not mean wiping you off the surface.

LK

pre 7 godina

Kosova,Albania is next to warmly and dutifully accept America's Missile Defense Shield against Slav Terrorism!
(Azir, 12 May 2016 16:21)

Russian terrorism. Most Slavs don't want to be associated with Russians. Only some Serb nationalists and radicals who live in the past do. That's why Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Croatia, Slovenia, and Bulgaria are part of NATO and want very little to do with Russia.

sj

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:25)
It’s a play on words since an AK 47 or M16 can also be said to be “defensive”. However, let’s look at this scenario; the Russians bring in their jamming equipment into that part of Moldovia they control and switch it on and it can cover up to 600 kilometres – result no communications, airflights or anything electronic working in nearly ½ of Europe.
What are the United States of Piss and Wind going to do then?
Its ruse or PR exercise for people in the US, nothing more. You may recall late last year the US sent in the USS Lassen into the disputed waters near the man-made islands in the South China Sea?
Yes it went close to 12 mile zone, but its helicopters (two Blackhawks) were non-operational and on deck and the main radar system was switched off. This is standard international procedure when entering another nation’s territorial waters.

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.
(observer, 13 May 2016 00:23) # Co

I think,you will find that USA is going broke right now!.The result(18 Trillion dollar debt) of involvement in too many countries, and not worrying,or fix their economy!

Questioner

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?

Paul

pre 7 godina

What is the harm of "defensive weapons"? Defensive weapons also let you launch aggression with impunity. Bullet proof vests can be used in terrorist attacks.

And of course a missile launcher can be used to launch missiles for any reason, defensive or aggressive.

rote

pre 7 godina

Observer : Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history.

Most often I do not have intension to leave a comment here but always there are idiot apes wHo spoil everything. What planet are you living on? What downward spiral are you talking about? Is it an open door day in your mad house? МУДАК ТАКАЯ!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIbNk_GnPvg

observer

pre 7 godina

Russia just got what it asked for, and that is only the beginning. Remember how the Soviet Union lost the arms race and fell apart. The same will happen again. Russia is broke, the economy falling apart, and everything is in a downward spiral. The situation will even get worse, and at a certain point public mood will turn against their fascist leader Putin. Bloodthirsty dictators like him never survived in history. Serbia should know that from it's current history as well. A dictatorship like Russia has no future.

sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia

pre 7 godina

Can anybody explain to me this interesting idea. that a 'missile defense shield', i.e. anti-missile weapons which are inherently defense weapons can be seen as a 'threat'?
(Questioner, 12 May 2016 17:

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond,compared to before,when missiles where in France,Germany and Britian.Now the missiles shield will be 500 km away ,compared to 3000 km.
That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.

icj1

pre 7 godina

They are for protection,but have aggressive launch missiles to counter attack.But can attack ,as well and are position now very close to the border of Russia,so Russian has shorter time to respond
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

You are so ignorant, mate. These missiles don't carry warheads so there is nothing for Russia to respond too. So, that you understand, they don't carry anything that explodes :) They work by hitting another missile and destroying it because of the speed of the impact. That's it. You are listening too much of Kremlin's propaganda mate - that's intended for internal consumption in Russia, not for you lol
----------

That's why Soviet Union,wanted to put missiles in Cuba(1969's),and if attacked can quickly respond.
(sasa.p from near Jagodina, Serbia, 13 May 2016 14:54)

The Soviet Union put offensive missiles in Cuba that carried nuclear warheads which could destroy any American city within minutes. Again you are just showing how ignorant you are by not understanding the difference between a missile that carries a nuclear warhead and a missile that does not carry any warhead at all (not even a warhead with conventional explosives). You don't need to be a four-star general to understand such a simple thing!