icj1
pre 8 godina
it looks like we are finally in agreement on everything, from the fact that the map you provided was not "evidence that the UN officially endorses or accepts your assertion that KiM is a "territory" or "jurisdiction" within Serbia's borders" to Serbia's position that the UN is status-neutral in regards to KiM and Serbia's position in support of UNSCR 124 and Helsinki Final Act.
(icj1, 27 January 2016 14:28)
Dude, Serbia's position is that the UN and its member states reaffirm its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Read paragraph 10 and annex 2 sections 6 and 8 of UNSCR 1244. No other status, neutral or otherwise, with regard to territorial integrity appear in UNSCR 1244. The UN map is consistent with UNSCR 1244. Yes I am glad we finally agree.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 27 January 2016 15:35)
Of course, UNSCR 1244 reaffirms the commitment of all UN member states to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Serbia - I did not say UNSCR 1244 is status-neutral with regard to Serbia. I said that I agree with Serbia's position http://www.kim.gov.rs/eng/v305.php that UNSCR 1244 is status-neutral in regards to KiM.
As for the map, of course it is consistent with UNSCR 1244 (otherwise it would be an illegal map) and, according to the UN, the map is not evidence that the UN officially endorses or accepts your assertion that KiM is a territory or jurisdiction within Serbia's borders.
54 Komentari
Sortiraj po: