LK : “He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria... villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so”
It is the first time that a Russian or a Soviet leader openly hinted at using the nukes. I personally take it very serious and to be true do not understand why. Yet I trust Putin and hope that it was needed. We never had an idea using such arms on our lands inhabited by our people. So you lie about Ukraine. Putin enjoys support of 87-89% of the Russians while 78% of the people live in towns and cities. So it was your second lie. Your third lie was about other nuclear countries that blackmailed with these arms. Those were N.Korea, India, Pakistan and the USA … Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not blackmailed or even warned.
Nikola Novakovic : “What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but … we are not Spartans, but... “
The statement had nothing to do with IS and was addressed to the US and Turkey only. Spartans were middle age Cossacks deployed in the region called Greece since early 19 century. In between the wars they trained and drilled and led ascetic life. Sometimes they arranged game that were later called Olympics. Greeks had nothing to do to all that though some of their ancestors could quite be among the Cossacks. Greek nation was first formed in 19 century and it has never been one nation but rather 4 separate Greek peoples. They are absolutely loyal to the Russians and the Serbs “but the truth is a better friend”
i hope Russia dont use nuces because it will start a news nuclear race around the world. Then every little country that want to be free should get a nuclear bomb
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
(LK, 9 December 2015 18:58)
=============================
At least he's sending out a warning, unlike the others who just use dirty bombs by surprise.
'Ataman...nukes are ok"...where were you born and educated, in a cave?? Nukes in the wrong hands can lead to mass destruction.
(Zoran..Sydney Australia, 9 December 2015 13:33)
=============================
You're right. In the wrong hands nukes are too horrible to imagine but they are already out there. If Russians used them agains IS they would be in the right hands and could save thousands of Russian lives and others' lives who might send ground troops.
Why do something the hard way if not necessary? We are not dealing with innocent people here. We are dealing with a Cancer which is spreading to us.
Notice how little fear Putin's suggestion generates in the public. The idea of Putin applying nuclear weapons to ISIS, I think, has a calming effect on most people, me included.
They certainly would like to apply them to us. If Israel hadn't taken out Iraq's Osirak reactor in '81, they would have them too.
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
I.S. cannot be defeated until their state sponsors relent or are themselves defeated.
The swamp must be drained; it is the swamp that gives the mosquito life.
We don't need nukes... Send in mladic and karazic and ISIS will run away...
What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but a full United force of ground troops to inflict a trauma on ISIS Which will make the allied invasion of Germany in WWII look like child's play... We can not have tweedle dee and tweedle dumb (NATO) fight ISIS, their soldiers have no idea how to fight a real war, the children in NATO countries and America are not skilled enough, they are easily traumatised by war and many suffer from PTSD after battle and commit suicide...!
What we need is Russian and Serbian ground troops, a United slavic army which will get this job done properly... While American and NATO troops played video games as children, many slavic children were taught survival skills, they are taken into mountains and rural areas and taught skills on how to survive... Many NATO troops grew up in suburbia, urban ares and spent the majority of their lives in peacful neighbour hoods...
The yugoslavs have constantly been through war since the ottomans, we know how to survive and how to crush an enemy, Russia has also proven that their people do not mess around during war, they go in and get the job done... NATO boys will never and can never match the real men, slavic men, we are not Spartans, but one can say, the Spartans were the children of the slavs, not literally speaking, theoretically speaking...
Sending in a slavic army is more powerful then a nuclear bomb..
Putin's actions in Syria may have managed to degrade the operational capabilities of the ISIS terrorists and their Saudi and Turkish supporters but it will take more than bombing to defeat them.It must defeat the ideology behind ISIS which i find very difficult even for Russia and its military might.Islamic fundamentalism created ISIS. It's been around for over 1300 years in various shapes and forms. The intent and actions of ISIS are no different to those of the Islamic armies of the 7th century, only the weapons differ.ISIS already has soldiers in every European country posing as local citizens. The war that Islam has been waging for centuries is now apparent to even the stupidest observer. The likes of Obama,Cameron,Merkel should be sent to the tower for continually claiming this has nothing to do with Islam. It is about nothing else!
The shorter the fight, the better. I disagree with Putin. Nukes are OK and they are relatively cheap. For the environment Russian nukes tend to be the cleanest ones, see Tsar bomb.
Wahabbittes shold be on the bottom of a radioactive crater. Just be careful of civilians and the historic landmarks and use the cleanest and most powerful ones.
Putin's actions in Syria may have managed to degrade the operational capabilities of the ISIS terrorists and their Saudi and Turkish supporters but it will take more than bombing to defeat them.It must defeat the ideology behind ISIS which i find very difficult even for Russia and its military might.Islamic fundamentalism created ISIS. It's been around for over 1300 years in various shapes and forms. The intent and actions of ISIS are no different to those of the Islamic armies of the 7th century, only the weapons differ.ISIS already has soldiers in every European country posing as local citizens. The war that Islam has been waging for centuries is now apparent to even the stupidest observer. The likes of Obama,Cameron,Merkel should be sent to the tower for continually claiming this has nothing to do with Islam. It is about nothing else!
We don't need nukes... Send in mladic and karazic and ISIS will run away...
What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but a full United force of ground troops to inflict a trauma on ISIS Which will make the allied invasion of Germany in WWII look like child's play... We can not have tweedle dee and tweedle dumb (NATO) fight ISIS, their soldiers have no idea how to fight a real war, the children in NATO countries and America are not skilled enough, they are easily traumatised by war and many suffer from PTSD after battle and commit suicide...!
What we need is Russian and Serbian ground troops, a United slavic army which will get this job done properly... While American and NATO troops played video games as children, many slavic children were taught survival skills, they are taken into mountains and rural areas and taught skills on how to survive... Many NATO troops grew up in suburbia, urban ares and spent the majority of their lives in peacful neighbour hoods...
The yugoslavs have constantly been through war since the ottomans, we know how to survive and how to crush an enemy, Russia has also proven that their people do not mess around during war, they go in and get the job done... NATO boys will never and can never match the real men, slavic men, we are not Spartans, but one can say, the Spartans were the children of the slavs, not literally speaking, theoretically speaking...
Sending in a slavic army is more powerful then a nuclear bomb..
I.S. cannot be defeated until their state sponsors relent or are themselves defeated.
The swamp must be drained; it is the swamp that gives the mosquito life.
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
(LK, 9 December 2015 18:58)
=============================
At least he's sending out a warning, unlike the others who just use dirty bombs by surprise.
Notice how little fear Putin's suggestion generates in the public. The idea of Putin applying nuclear weapons to ISIS, I think, has a calming effect on most people, me included.
They certainly would like to apply them to us. If Israel hadn't taken out Iraq's Osirak reactor in '81, they would have them too.
'Ataman...nukes are ok"...where were you born and educated, in a cave?? Nukes in the wrong hands can lead to mass destruction.
(Zoran..Sydney Australia, 9 December 2015 13:33)
=============================
You're right. In the wrong hands nukes are too horrible to imagine but they are already out there. If Russians used them agains IS they would be in the right hands and could save thousands of Russian lives and others' lives who might send ground troops.
Why do something the hard way if not necessary? We are not dealing with innocent people here. We are dealing with a Cancer which is spreading to us.
i hope Russia dont use nuces because it will start a news nuclear race around the world. Then every little country that want to be free should get a nuclear bomb
The shorter the fight, the better. I disagree with Putin. Nukes are OK and they are relatively cheap. For the environment Russian nukes tend to be the cleanest ones, see Tsar bomb.
Wahabbittes shold be on the bottom of a radioactive crater. Just be careful of civilians and the historic landmarks and use the cleanest and most powerful ones.
LK : “He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria... villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so”
It is the first time that a Russian or a Soviet leader openly hinted at using the nukes. I personally take it very serious and to be true do not understand why. Yet I trust Putin and hope that it was needed. We never had an idea using such arms on our lands inhabited by our people. So you lie about Ukraine. Putin enjoys support of 87-89% of the Russians while 78% of the people live in towns and cities. So it was your second lie. Your third lie was about other nuclear countries that blackmailed with these arms. Those were N.Korea, India, Pakistan and the USA … Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not blackmailed or even warned.
Nikola Novakovic : “What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but … we are not Spartans, but... “
The statement had nothing to do with IS and was addressed to the US and Turkey only. Spartans were middle age Cossacks deployed in the region called Greece since early 19 century. In between the wars they trained and drilled and led ascetic life. Sometimes they arranged game that were later called Olympics. Greeks had nothing to do to all that though some of their ancestors could quite be among the Cossacks. Greek nation was first formed in 19 century and it has never been one nation but rather 4 separate Greek peoples. They are absolutely loyal to the Russians and the Serbs “but the truth is a better friend”
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
The shorter the fight, the better. I disagree with Putin. Nukes are OK and they are relatively cheap. For the environment Russian nukes tend to be the cleanest ones, see Tsar bomb.
Wahabbittes shold be on the bottom of a radioactive crater. Just be careful of civilians and the historic landmarks and use the cleanest and most powerful ones.
We don't need nukes... Send in mladic and karazic and ISIS will run away...
What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but a full United force of ground troops to inflict a trauma on ISIS Which will make the allied invasion of Germany in WWII look like child's play... We can not have tweedle dee and tweedle dumb (NATO) fight ISIS, their soldiers have no idea how to fight a real war, the children in NATO countries and America are not skilled enough, they are easily traumatised by war and many suffer from PTSD after battle and commit suicide...!
What we need is Russian and Serbian ground troops, a United slavic army which will get this job done properly... While American and NATO troops played video games as children, many slavic children were taught survival skills, they are taken into mountains and rural areas and taught skills on how to survive... Many NATO troops grew up in suburbia, urban ares and spent the majority of their lives in peacful neighbour hoods...
The yugoslavs have constantly been through war since the ottomans, we know how to survive and how to crush an enemy, Russia has also proven that their people do not mess around during war, they go in and get the job done... NATO boys will never and can never match the real men, slavic men, we are not Spartans, but one can say, the Spartans were the children of the slavs, not literally speaking, theoretically speaking...
Sending in a slavic army is more powerful then a nuclear bomb..
LK : “He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria... villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so”
It is the first time that a Russian or a Soviet leader openly hinted at using the nukes. I personally take it very serious and to be true do not understand why. Yet I trust Putin and hope that it was needed. We never had an idea using such arms on our lands inhabited by our people. So you lie about Ukraine. Putin enjoys support of 87-89% of the Russians while 78% of the people live in towns and cities. So it was your second lie. Your third lie was about other nuclear countries that blackmailed with these arms. Those were N.Korea, India, Pakistan and the USA … Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not blackmailed or even warned.
Nikola Novakovic : “What we need is to defeat ISIS Is not bombs, but … we are not Spartans, but... “
The statement had nothing to do with IS and was addressed to the US and Turkey only. Spartans were middle age Cossacks deployed in the region called Greece since early 19 century. In between the wars they trained and drilled and led ascetic life. Sometimes they arranged game that were later called Olympics. Greeks had nothing to do to all that though some of their ancestors could quite be among the Cossacks. Greek nation was first formed in 19 century and it has never been one nation but rather 4 separate Greek peoples. They are absolutely loyal to the Russians and the Serbs “but the truth is a better friend”
Putin's actions in Syria may have managed to degrade the operational capabilities of the ISIS terrorists and their Saudi and Turkish supporters but it will take more than bombing to defeat them.It must defeat the ideology behind ISIS which i find very difficult even for Russia and its military might.Islamic fundamentalism created ISIS. It's been around for over 1300 years in various shapes and forms. The intent and actions of ISIS are no different to those of the Islamic armies of the 7th century, only the weapons differ.ISIS already has soldiers in every European country posing as local citizens. The war that Islam has been waging for centuries is now apparent to even the stupidest observer. The likes of Obama,Cameron,Merkel should be sent to the tower for continually claiming this has nothing to do with Islam. It is about nothing else!
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
I.S. cannot be defeated until their state sponsors relent or are themselves defeated.
The swamp must be drained; it is the swamp that gives the mosquito life.
i hope Russia dont use nuces because it will start a news nuclear race around the world. Then every little country that want to be free should get a nuclear bomb
Notice how little fear Putin's suggestion generates in the public. The idea of Putin applying nuclear weapons to ISIS, I think, has a calming effect on most people, me included.
They certainly would like to apply them to us. If Israel hadn't taken out Iraq's Osirak reactor in '81, they would have them too.
'Ataman...nukes are ok"...where were you born and educated, in a cave?? Nukes in the wrong hands can lead to mass destruction.
(Zoran..Sydney Australia, 9 December 2015 13:33)
=============================
You're right. In the wrong hands nukes are too horrible to imagine but they are already out there. If Russians used them agains IS they would be in the right hands and could save thousands of Russian lives and others' lives who might send ground troops.
Why do something the hard way if not necessary? We are not dealing with innocent people here. We are dealing with a Cancer which is spreading to us.
Really irresponsible for Putin to keep casually bringing up nuclear weapons. He did it with Ukraine and now in Syria. I guess it makes him look tough to Russian villagers who support him. You don't see any other nuclear countries talking so casually about nuclear weapons, only Russia.
(LK, 9 December 2015 18:58)
=============================
At least he's sending out a warning, unlike the others who just use dirty bombs by surprise.
IMAGE SOURCE
14 Komentari
Sortiraj po: