icj1
pre 8 godina
So, now that we know that this guy is the leader of an Austrian party, his opinion can obviously be ignored since he is not speaking for a court and did not provide any arguments other than because he says so!
(icj1, 19 October 2015 03:38
===…==
You really do like to look like a dill don't you. No, he is not speaking for the court but I'm pretty sure he is familiar with Resolution 1244 and capable of expressing an informed opinion.
(Peggy, 20 October 2015 00:37)
Well, I did not say he cannot express an opinion... He is free to repeat it three times a day before meals. I said that his opinion can obviously be ignored since he is not speaking for a court and he did not provide any arguments. People usually are not sheep to just believe something because somebody says so.
Being an homo sapiens and using the brain just a bit, I checked UNSCR 1244 and it says nowhere that a "Kosovo's request for membership in UNESCO/international organizations shall not be considered". So why should we believe this guy since (1) he is not a court, (2) he does not speak for the UNSC and (3) he did not provide (or B92 ommitted) any arguments to support his position?!!!
----------
I am not speaking for the court when I say that I can't sell my neighbour's vegetable garden but I am pretty sure I know what I'm talking about.
(Peggy, 20 October 2015 00:37)
Of course, I'm sure you know yourself better than anybody else to be able to say what you are not able to do :)
16 Komentari
Sortiraj po: