Vojislav Seselj says a report published by the daily Blic in 2010, alleging that he had ordered the murder of Tomislav Nikolic, was "a complete fabrication."
A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
(John Bosnitch, 4 May 2015 17:02)
Hey genius, just a note to you so called nationalist seekers of truth - Seselj DID not "expose" anything. Had he done so he would have produced evidence such as a jounaislt admitting they lied, or proof an editor fabricated or allowed the publication of false information.
All he has done is DENY the allegations.
If your proof of exposition is someone crying crocodile tears - then you are not sharing the truth but spreading your own propoganda.
Once again, B92 misses the point. This article should be focussed on Seselj pressing charges *against* the yellow-journalism tabloid BLIC.But instead of outlining his charges against the paper, B92 makes Seselj the defendant by saying he "denies" ordering a hit. A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
Once again, B92 misses the point. This article should be focussed on Seselj pressing charges *against* the yellow-journalism tabloid BLIC.But instead of outlining his charges against the paper, B92 makes Seselj the defendant by saying he "denies" ordering a hit. A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
(John Bosnitch, 4 May 2015 17:02)
Hey genius, just a note to you so called nationalist seekers of truth - Seselj DID not "expose" anything. Had he done so he would have produced evidence such as a jounaislt admitting they lied, or proof an editor fabricated or allowed the publication of false information.
All he has done is DENY the allegations.
If your proof of exposition is someone crying crocodile tears - then you are not sharing the truth but spreading your own propoganda.
Once again, B92 misses the point. This article should be focussed on Seselj pressing charges *against* the yellow-journalism tabloid BLIC.But instead of outlining his charges against the paper, B92 makes Seselj the defendant by saying he "denies" ordering a hit. A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
A more professional title would be something like: "Seselj exposes false-reporting by BLIC". Surely the US/NATO demonization of Seselj has lasted more than long enough to satisfy the lie-masters in Washington DC, hasn't it? Or does B92 find it necessary to go even further in support of the US-globalist empire?
(John Bosnitch, 4 May 2015 17:02)
Hey genius, just a note to you so called nationalist seekers of truth - Seselj DID not "expose" anything. Had he done so he would have produced evidence such as a jounaislt admitting they lied, or proof an editor fabricated or allowed the publication of false information.
All he has done is DENY the allegations.
If your proof of exposition is someone crying crocodile tears - then you are not sharing the truth but spreading your own propoganda.
IMAGE SOURCE
6 Komentari
Sortiraj po: