A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Ok... then what?!
----------
According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Please provide the evidence where Judge Harhoff stated that "the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat."
(heyhey, 10 April 2015 19:30) One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
---
The Judge was an inside whistleblower, not an internet commentator. Edward Snowden was only one out of 30000 employees, that blew the whistle on the NSA, so, yes one out of 50 or one out of 30000 can serve as sufficient proof if it is authoritative.
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27) \
mate, not sure what the raving above means!!! Sounds like the writing of somebody who had fever - there are no logical connections between sentences and words :)
. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
---
A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
----------
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
So the future of the government of Serbia (according to Vulin and his theory about Seselj's release) now depends on a doctor's notice. This new excuse for not acting is hilarious. Vucic has great advisors. Wait, maybe it was Tony Blair's advice?
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Comment -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
OK so they claim that he was released to throw down the government, he obviously failed since no one gave him any attention and radicalism is dead in Serbia...... now sending him back will not cause any issues because again no one cares about him, so send him back, it's very simple.
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
(the truth, 6 April 2015 17:58)
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
comment - a Trial is not dependent on a participation of an accused one !.
You are not the truth only a selfdeceived one.
Arn.Sweden.
(Arn.Sweden., 6 April 2015 19:59)
True if he sat there at the table and never filed a thing nor feigned sick the trial would have been over in less than 2 years. It is not dependent on his participating but if he does which he DID then the timing does! And remember he filed suit to be able to defend himself and won, which means that he did not have an attorney to continue in his absences.
in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
(Branko, 6 April 2015 12:41)
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
Makes sense, if the man was released due to bad medical status, the reason why to take him back to detention could be only positive progress in his medical status.....in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
Makes sense, if the man was released due to bad medical status, the reason why to take him back to detention could be only positive progress in his medical status.....in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
(Branko, 6 April 2015 12:41)
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
comment - a Trial is not dependent on a participation of an accused one !.
You are not the truth only a selfdeceived one.
Arn.Sweden.
(Arn.Sweden., 6 April 2015 19:59)
True if he sat there at the table and never filed a thing nor feigned sick the trial would have been over in less than 2 years. It is not dependent on his participating but if he does which he DID then the timing does! And remember he filed suit to be able to defend himself and won, which means that he did not have an attorney to continue in his absences.
. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
(the truth, 6 April 2015 17:58)
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
OK so they claim that he was released to throw down the government, he obviously failed since no one gave him any attention and radicalism is dead in Serbia...... now sending him back will not cause any issues because again no one cares about him, so send him back, it's very simple.
So the future of the government of Serbia (according to Vulin and his theory about Seselj's release) now depends on a doctor's notice. This new excuse for not acting is hilarious. Vucic has great advisors. Wait, maybe it was Tony Blair's advice?
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
----------
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
---
A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Comment -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27) \
mate, not sure what the raving above means!!! Sounds like the writing of somebody who had fever - there are no logical connections between sentences and words :)
A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Ok... then what?!
----------
According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Please provide the evidence where Judge Harhoff stated that "the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat."
(heyhey, 10 April 2015 19:30) One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
---
The Judge was an inside whistleblower, not an internet commentator. Edward Snowden was only one out of 30000 employees, that blew the whistle on the NSA, so, yes one out of 50 or one out of 30000 can serve as sufficient proof if it is authoritative.
Makes sense, if the man was released due to bad medical status, the reason why to take him back to detention could be only positive progress in his medical status.....in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
in addition to that I don't know any European country where someone could be kept in detention for 11y without any conviction. ..
(Branko, 6 April 2015 12:41)
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Comment -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
comment - a Trial is not dependent on a participation of an accused one !.
You are not the truth only a selfdeceived one.
Arn.Sweden.
(Arn.Sweden., 6 April 2015 19:59)
True if he sat there at the table and never filed a thing nor feigned sick the trial would have been over in less than 2 years. It is not dependent on his participating but if he does which he DID then the timing does! And remember he filed suit to be able to defend himself and won, which means that he did not have an attorney to continue in his absences.
OK so they claim that he was released to throw down the government, he obviously failed since no one gave him any attention and radicalism is dead in Serbia...... now sending him back will not cause any issues because again no one cares about him, so send him back, it's very simple.
No one till now played, sick,stupid and intentionally interrupted the trial, over and over again.Think about it.
(the truth, 6 April 2015 17:58)
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
So the future of the government of Serbia (according to Vulin and his theory about Seselj's release) now depends on a doctor's notice. This new excuse for not acting is hilarious. Vucic has great advisors. Wait, maybe it was Tony Blair's advice?
For some posters here, a "fair" trial for Seselj would have been one where his many motions were summarily dismissed by the judges without due process just to make the trial faster.
(icj1, 7 April 2015 02:25)
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
The prosecution says there is; Seselj says there's not. The Court is settling the matter. It's not going to be me or you to settle it.
----------
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
---
A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
. According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
What Seselj or any accused says or not says doesnt matter !
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27)
In kangaroo court, yes, you are correct. But at the ICTY the accused has rights to say things in the form of motions that the judges must deliberate and deliver a decision on.
(icj1, 8 April 2015 04:17)
Comment - Dont You know the Juridical Systems ?
If Seselj says He is not Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He must be Proven Guilty beyond any Reasable Doubt.
Further .
If Seselj admit He is Guilty,
For a Guilty Verdict He mus Still be Proven Guilty Beyond any Reasonable doubt.
The Judges cant beyond any reasonable doubt know,
what has taken place withind the chain of command under Seseljs rule.
That is why Seselj contradicts them.
Further -
Is there proof Seselj is guilty or not ?
(Arn.Sweden., 7 April 2015 10:27) \
mate, not sure what the raving above means!!! Sounds like the writing of somebody who had fever - there are no logical connections between sentences and words :)
A kangaroo court actually permits the filing of motions to provide for a deceiving appearance of a fair and just trial, even though verdicts in reality are not based on evidence or law.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Ok... then what?!
----------
According to the ICTY's own Judge Harhoff, the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 10 April 2015 16:36)
Please provide the evidence where Judge Harhoff stated that "the ICTY qualifies as such an organization since its decisions and judgments are based on external political diktat."
(heyhey, 10 April 2015 19:30) One judge out of what 50 is critical of the ICTY and of course HE is the honest one! And in your mind that is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. What a true jurist you are.
---
The Judge was an inside whistleblower, not an internet commentator. Edward Snowden was only one out of 30000 employees, that blew the whistle on the NSA, so, yes one out of 50 or one out of 30000 can serve as sufficient proof if it is authoritative.
IMAGE SOURCE
18 Komentari
Sortiraj po: