5

Tuesday, 13.01.2015.

16:40

Chinese media: West facing "payback for colonialism"

The religious and cultural tensions the West faces are “payback” for slavery and colonialism, a Chinese state-run newspaper said on Tuesday.

Izvor: AFP

Chinese media: West facing "payback for colonialism" IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

5 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

j

pre 9 godina

Spoken like a dictator. So if some idiot feels offended then we change our way of life? I guess it make sense in the Chinese society because you have one person on top and if he feels offended then their way of life changes. Either that or they will run you over with their tanks. You are not allowed to post this on the internet either, because some Chinese idiot on the top felt offended.

Goran.

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.
(Joe A, 13 January 2015 20:58)

Freedom today is nothing but a farce.

Both the staff of Charlie Hedbo and the extremists are slaves to their own ignorance and stupidity.

Who the hell gives them the right to attack someone for their religious beliefs? Is that not the polar opposite of freedom?

And to kill someone because of a cartoon?

Humans will never know freedom because to truly let go of their hate, ignorance and fears, their shackles, would mean forfeiting their individuality; without individuality we are all exactly the same - terrifying.

Joe A

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.

Nikolle

pre 9 godina

What stupid conclusions. i really would like to know what expert came up with this analysis. payback? this implies that the West was owed one for sins of the past, but then how far back to we wish to go? nobody is free from karma if we take this garbage narrative

Nikolle

pre 9 godina

What stupid conclusions. i really would like to know what expert came up with this analysis. payback? this implies that the West was owed one for sins of the past, but then how far back to we wish to go? nobody is free from karma if we take this garbage narrative

Joe A

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.

Goran.

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.
(Joe A, 13 January 2015 20:58)

Freedom today is nothing but a farce.

Both the staff of Charlie Hedbo and the extremists are slaves to their own ignorance and stupidity.

Who the hell gives them the right to attack someone for their religious beliefs? Is that not the polar opposite of freedom?

And to kill someone because of a cartoon?

Humans will never know freedom because to truly let go of their hate, ignorance and fears, their shackles, would mean forfeiting their individuality; without individuality we are all exactly the same - terrifying.

j

pre 9 godina

Spoken like a dictator. So if some idiot feels offended then we change our way of life? I guess it make sense in the Chinese society because you have one person on top and if he feels offended then their way of life changes. Either that or they will run you over with their tanks. You are not allowed to post this on the internet either, because some Chinese idiot on the top felt offended.

Nikolle

pre 9 godina

What stupid conclusions. i really would like to know what expert came up with this analysis. payback? this implies that the West was owed one for sins of the past, but then how far back to we wish to go? nobody is free from karma if we take this garbage narrative

Joe A

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.

j

pre 9 godina

Spoken like a dictator. So if some idiot feels offended then we change our way of life? I guess it make sense in the Chinese society because you have one person on top and if he feels offended then their way of life changes. Either that or they will run you over with their tanks. You are not allowed to post this on the internet either, because some Chinese idiot on the top felt offended.

Goran.

pre 9 godina

"The official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary on Monday that the incident “should not be simplified as attacks on press freedom, for even the freedom itself has its limits, which does not include insulting, sneering or taunting other people’s religion or beliefs,""

If freedom itself has limits then it is not freedom. I don't think China can lecture anybody on freedom.
Is it ok for religions to insult whole other groups such as 'infidels', other religions, gays, etc. and actually call for violende against them? Charlie Hebdo does not call for violence, some religions do.
(Joe A, 13 January 2015 20:58)

Freedom today is nothing but a farce.

Both the staff of Charlie Hedbo and the extremists are slaves to their own ignorance and stupidity.

Who the hell gives them the right to attack someone for their religious beliefs? Is that not the polar opposite of freedom?

And to kill someone because of a cartoon?

Humans will never know freedom because to truly let go of their hate, ignorance and fears, their shackles, would mean forfeiting their individuality; without individuality we are all exactly the same - terrifying.