Kosovo office head "confident" Serbs will "prove innocence"

In normal societies, you do not have to prove innocence but rather one has to prove you are guilty. Of course in the Albanian occupied kosovastan, Serbs are guilty just for being Serbian. The presence of Serbs and Serbian Orthodox Churches in Kosovo-Metohija still enrages rabid Albanian ultra nationalists.

@Ari

You really sound stupid when you try to defend Serbian criminals. Of course you have to prove your innocence if you claim to be innocent. That's really simple what part of proving your innocence do you not understand? Secondly, we have Albanian orthodox churches and catholic churches, nothing about a church would upset an Albanian. Serbian criminals on the other hand yes, and so we will get every Serb that has taken part in war crimes. You're upset because we will not let go of your Serbian criminal brothers. Nice try as usual.

Ari Gold, 26 August 2014 17:37
Do you really believe the crap you write??? Do you really believe such sayings as "innocent until proven guilty" Why do your group call Thaci a war criminal, he has never been indicted much less "proven" guilty of any crimes.
Was the millionaire business owner in Serbia that supported the DS party in Serbia treated as an innocent person when he was detained for months without even an indictment??
Do you believe anyone goes into a court without the goal of PROVING their innocence?
Of course in this case he was arrested on information fed to EULEX by those who had reasons to get him out of the elections, not to mention Belgrade officials by name. So it would not be surprising if that information eventually proved to be false.
A person is arrested for any crime and they must either remain in jail or post enormous amounts of money to be freed until a trial where they can be proven guilty or not guilty. This is consistent throughout the world but can that really be shown as an example of a person being innocent UNTIL proven guilty??
Also no one is ever proven innocent. The verdict is either guilty, or not guilty(meaning the prosecution was unable to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt) but no one is ever ruled "innocent", there will always be someone who believes their guilty simply because they were accused.

(Really?, 27 August 2014 00:36)

I don't know what millionaire who financed the DS you are referring to. Nor do I understand how that is relevant to anything. Thaci has not been indited because the courts that handle ex-YU wars are the Hague and this new Pristina based EULEX court. Both of these kangaroo courts are managed by the same governments that aided and armed the terrorist KLA which Thaci led after Serbia took out their first terrorist leader Adem Jashiri.

There is more than enough evidence to AT LEAST indict Thaci, and it has existed for over 10 years now. The nations that are managing this whole thing do not have it in their interests for his conviction.

The rest of your dribble I don't find relevant to anything really.

In normal societies, you do not have to prove innocence but rather one has to prove you are guilty. Of course in the Albanian occupied kosovastan, Serbs are guilty just for being Serbian. The presence of Serbs and Serbian Orthodox Churches in Kosovo-Metohija still enrages rabid Albanian ultra nationalists.

@Ari

You really sound stupid when you try to defend Serbian criminals. Of course you have to prove your innocence if you claim to be innocent. That's really simple what part of proving your innocence do you not understand? Secondly, we have Albanian orthodox churches and catholic churches, nothing about a church would upset an Albanian. Serbian criminals on the other hand yes, and so we will get every Serb that has taken part in war crimes. You're upset because we will not let go of your Serbian criminal brothers. Nice try as usual.

(Really?, 27 August 2014 00:36)

I don't know what millionaire who financed the DS you are referring to. Nor do I understand how that is relevant to anything. Thaci has not been indited because the courts that handle ex-YU wars are the Hague and this new Pristina based EULEX court. Both of these kangaroo courts are managed by the same governments that aided and armed the terrorist KLA which Thaci led after Serbia took out their first terrorist leader Adem Jashiri.

There is more than enough evidence to AT LEAST indict Thaci, and it has existed for over 10 years now. The nations that are managing this whole thing do not have it in their interests for his conviction.

The rest of your dribble I don't find relevant to anything really.

Ari Gold, 26 August 2014 17:37
Do you really believe the crap you write??? Do you really believe such sayings as "innocent until proven guilty" Why do your group call Thaci a war criminal, he has never been indicted much less "proven" guilty of any crimes.
Was the millionaire business owner in Serbia that supported the DS party in Serbia treated as an innocent person when he was detained for months without even an indictment??
Do you believe anyone goes into a court without the goal of PROVING their innocence?
Of course in this case he was arrested on information fed to EULEX by those who had reasons to get him out of the elections, not to mention Belgrade officials by name. So it would not be surprising if that information eventually proved to be false.
A person is arrested for any crime and they must either remain in jail or post enormous amounts of money to be freed until a trial where they can be proven guilty or not guilty. This is consistent throughout the world but can that really be shown as an example of a person being innocent UNTIL proven guilty??
Also no one is ever proven innocent. The verdict is either guilty, or not guilty(meaning the prosecution was unable to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt) but no one is ever ruled "innocent", there will always be someone who believes their guilty simply because they were accused.