Reports: NATO asks Austria to send more troops to Kosovo

But I thought NATO troops will soon withdraw from Kosova, and Serbians were next in line to take back their "holy land" lol. Poor Serbians they have no idea what they're doing, or saying for that matter. Serbians will be miserable in and out of Kosova for their entire life. Too bad so sad lol.

If Austria is not a member of Nato but chooses to send it's troops to Nato operations then why not join Nato???

Nato should ask Serbia to send its trops to kosovo it would be lot more apropirate thing to do.

In view of Austria's aggressive role in the Balkans during the last 120 years I find it highly disturbing that they should be asked to replace the French contingent.
(Tony (from Berlin), 17 January 2014 12:25)

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...

Ja, ja we need some good sturdy German stock to keep the Serbs in line, in the North of Kosovo.

In view of Austria's aggressive role in the Balkans during the last 120 years I find it highly disturbing that they should be asked to replace the French contingent.
Oh, sorry, I forgot, Austria was a "victim" of German agression in 1938 so they are now the "good guys"! They have nothing to do with Germany's attempted domination of Europe... Nothing at all...

"If Austria is not a member of Nato but chooses to send it's troops to Nato operations then why not join Nato???"
(Qunatom, 16 January 2014 14:36)

In case you don't know: KFOR is not a NATO operation, it never was, it works under UN mandate like many other peacekeeping missions in the world

Arrival of additional contingents of Austrian troops as part of NATO troops in Kosovo, is encouraging news for enhancing the protection of the Serbian population in Kosovo.

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...
(icj1, 17 January 2014 19:25)
===…==
No, but the old enemies are current enemies. This has not changed.
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

You are absolutely correct. That was my point. That Serbs refuse to move on :)
----------

NATO bombed Serbia and we should trust them to protect Serbs?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Serbia absolutely shouldn't - that would be the worst that could happen for Kosovo. If Serbia had been a NATO member, Kosovo would not be independent today.
----------

When did NATO become the UN?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Are you having hallucinations, dear? Don't you know that NATO and UN are different organizations?!

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...
(icj1, 17 January 2014 19:25)
================================
No, but the old enemies are current enemies. This has not changed.

NATO bombed Serbia and we should trust them to protect Serbs?
When did NATO become the UN?

When did NATO become the UN?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Are you having hallucinations, dear? Don't you know that NATO and UN are different organizations?!
(icj1, 20 January 2014 19:02)
=========================
Dead set, you're an idiot. If you can't understnad my meaning then don't reply because you are only making an even bigger fool of yourself, if that is even possible.

Do you really think that your answers are smart? They are ridiculous answers coming from a smart arse.

"If Austria is not a member of Nato but chooses to send it's troops to Nato operations then why not join Nato???"
(Qunatom, 16 January 2014 14:36)

In case you don't know: KFOR is not a NATO operation, it never was, it works under UN mandate like many other peacekeeping missions in the world

But I thought NATO troops will soon withdraw from Kosova, and Serbians were next in line to take back their "holy land" lol. Poor Serbians they have no idea what they're doing, or saying for that matter. Serbians will be miserable in and out of Kosova for their entire life. Too bad so sad lol.

Nato should ask Serbia to send its trops to kosovo it would be lot more apropirate thing to do.

Ja, ja we need some good sturdy German stock to keep the Serbs in line, in the North of Kosovo.

If Austria is not a member of Nato but chooses to send it's troops to Nato operations then why not join Nato???

In view of Austria's aggressive role in the Balkans during the last 120 years I find it highly disturbing that they should be asked to replace the French contingent.
Oh, sorry, I forgot, Austria was a "victim" of German agression in 1938 so they are now the "good guys"! They have nothing to do with Germany's attempted domination of Europe... Nothing at all...

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...
(icj1, 17 January 2014 19:25)
================================
No, but the old enemies are current enemies. This has not changed.

NATO bombed Serbia and we should trust them to protect Serbs?
When did NATO become the UN?

In view of Austria's aggressive role in the Balkans during the last 120 years I find it highly disturbing that they should be asked to replace the French contingent.
(Tony (from Berlin), 17 January 2014 12:25)

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...

Arrival of additional contingents of Austrian troops as part of NATO troops in Kosovo, is encouraging news for enhancing the protection of the Serbian population in Kosovo.

The world has moved on, dear, and is no longer in 1389 or 1940s...
(icj1, 17 January 2014 19:25)
===…==
No, but the old enemies are current enemies. This has not changed.
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

You are absolutely correct. That was my point. That Serbs refuse to move on :)
----------

NATO bombed Serbia and we should trust them to protect Serbs?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Serbia absolutely shouldn't - that would be the worst that could happen for Kosovo. If Serbia had been a NATO member, Kosovo would not be independent today.
----------

When did NATO become the UN?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Are you having hallucinations, dear? Don't you know that NATO and UN are different organizations?!

When did NATO become the UN?
(Peggy, 20 January 2014 07:09)

Are you having hallucinations, dear? Don't you know that NATO and UN are different organizations?!
(icj1, 20 January 2014 19:02)
=========================
Dead set, you're an idiot. If you can't understnad my meaning then don't reply because you are only making an even bigger fool of yourself, if that is even possible.

Do you really think that your answers are smart? They are ridiculous answers coming from a smart arse.