2

Wednesday, 21.08.2013.

12:10

Foreign investments "exceed EUR 500 million"

Foreign investors put in over EUR 500 million in various projects in Serbia in the first half of the year, Serbian officials said.

Izvor: Tanjug

Foreign investments "exceed EUR 500 million" IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

2 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

ida

pre 10 godina

What Serbia can do to help its budget is to repeal the unilateral implementation of the SAA agreement from 2008. Even the EU politicians mentioned it was only done to help Boris Tadic's party at the elections. After it got what it wanted through the maneuver, it immediately cancelled/froze the agreement on its side, and Serbia is left without custom revenue for imported EU goods.
Nebojsa Malic says in his latest piece on antiwar.com: "The decision to unilaterally implement the SAA – signed then immediately suspended by the EU in March 2008 – to allow customs-free imports from the EU, has not only laid waste to Serbia’s budget, but devastated domestic industry and agriculture."

There is no reason for Serbia to keep up its unilateral part which is harming it. Serbia fell for a tactic ruse only meant to boost voter support to a political party it preferred.

Serbia needs to collect customs on imported EU goods again. Only if and when it's an EU member should it drop it if it has to.

If Serbia's desperate for revenue why does it keep up the lopsided agreement? Cancel it like the EU did on its behalf. Serbia's already lost almost 5 1/2 years of customs revenue and many jobs in the meantime due to EU imports.

luciano

pre 10 godina

I can share my plan with the Serbian government on how to make Serbia the number one country in Europe in attracting foreign capital and would gladly do so.

luciano

pre 10 godina

I can share my plan with the Serbian government on how to make Serbia the number one country in Europe in attracting foreign capital and would gladly do so.

ida

pre 10 godina

What Serbia can do to help its budget is to repeal the unilateral implementation of the SAA agreement from 2008. Even the EU politicians mentioned it was only done to help Boris Tadic's party at the elections. After it got what it wanted through the maneuver, it immediately cancelled/froze the agreement on its side, and Serbia is left without custom revenue for imported EU goods.
Nebojsa Malic says in his latest piece on antiwar.com: "The decision to unilaterally implement the SAA – signed then immediately suspended by the EU in March 2008 – to allow customs-free imports from the EU, has not only laid waste to Serbia’s budget, but devastated domestic industry and agriculture."

There is no reason for Serbia to keep up its unilateral part which is harming it. Serbia fell for a tactic ruse only meant to boost voter support to a political party it preferred.

Serbia needs to collect customs on imported EU goods again. Only if and when it's an EU member should it drop it if it has to.

If Serbia's desperate for revenue why does it keep up the lopsided agreement? Cancel it like the EU did on its behalf. Serbia's already lost almost 5 1/2 years of customs revenue and many jobs in the meantime due to EU imports.

luciano

pre 10 godina

I can share my plan with the Serbian government on how to make Serbia the number one country in Europe in attracting foreign capital and would gladly do so.

ida

pre 10 godina

What Serbia can do to help its budget is to repeal the unilateral implementation of the SAA agreement from 2008. Even the EU politicians mentioned it was only done to help Boris Tadic's party at the elections. After it got what it wanted through the maneuver, it immediately cancelled/froze the agreement on its side, and Serbia is left without custom revenue for imported EU goods.
Nebojsa Malic says in his latest piece on antiwar.com: "The decision to unilaterally implement the SAA – signed then immediately suspended by the EU in March 2008 – to allow customs-free imports from the EU, has not only laid waste to Serbia’s budget, but devastated domestic industry and agriculture."

There is no reason for Serbia to keep up its unilateral part which is harming it. Serbia fell for a tactic ruse only meant to boost voter support to a political party it preferred.

Serbia needs to collect customs on imported EU goods again. Only if and when it's an EU member should it drop it if it has to.

If Serbia's desperate for revenue why does it keep up the lopsided agreement? Cancel it like the EU did on its behalf. Serbia's already lost almost 5 1/2 years of customs revenue and many jobs in the meantime due to EU imports.