DSS: Ask NATO whether it supports Albania-Kosovo deal

Get over it already! Kosova is no longer a part of Serbia, this should have been clear to Serbia for the past 13 years now! How in the world do you expect to stop Kosovar Albanian cooperation, in this or any other area? 95% of Kosova's population is and has been Albanian, so why wouldn't they put these agreements in place, because some still believe that Serbian has sovereignty over Kosova? Keep dreaming, those days are forever gone! Welcome to the age of democracy!!!

Stressing that the agreement jeopardizes Serbia's territorial integrity

How is possible to jeopardize Serbia's territory, since Kosova have no intention what so ever to meddle in Serbian territory!?

Kosova was liberated and protected by NATO and Albania as a member continues to follow this.........

Serbia has no business involving itself in these foreign affairs.

I'm sure NATO supports this deal.

If you ask me why I think it's natural (though some may be in disagreement) that a Albania-Kosovo deal is or can be in the "works" so to speak is because these countries can naturally feel a kinship with one another even though it was Serbia(not Albania) that was Kosovo's "parent" country.Think about it the Albanian language is the official language in both of these countries,in the duration of the Kosovo conflict of the late 1990s I believe that numerous amount of ethnic Albanians fled to Albania to escape the conflict and that Albania is one of the nations that recognize Kosovo's sovereignty.

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson, 9 July 2013 16:58)

The conditions for Kosovo set out by UNSCR 1244 only applied whilst Kosovo's final status was yet to be established, however this occurred over five years ago.

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson, 9 July 2013 16:58)
==============================
Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
Res. 1244 is not worth much these days when it comes to NATO.

Serbian government has signed Kosovo away. It's going to take some time to condition Serbs to it, but it has already happened.

During question time in parliament on Tuesday, he he said that the agreement makes it possible for the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija, and asked whether this means that that they will be able to "stay in north Kosovo and finish the job that the Kosovo forces cannot."

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.

I don't think Serbia has the right to demand anything when it comes to the agreement between two other countries.
Neither Kosovo, nor Albania has ever threatened the territorial integrity of any country in the region, including Serbia.
Serbia is free to sign similar agreements with other countries in the region... oh, wait a minute... no Balkan country could trust Serbia when it comes to such matters.

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson )

That's questionable. According to UN1244, Serb parallel institutions in north kosovo are illegal. Serbia was the first country to violate 1244.

Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
Res. 1244 is not worth much these days when it comes to NATO.

Serbian government has signed Kosovo away. It's going to take some time to condition Serbs to it, but it has already happened.
(Peggy, 9 July 2013 23:19)

Where in UNSCR 1244 does it say Kosovo isn't allowed to be a separate country? It says that Kosovo is to be a sovereign part of FRY under UN governance whilst Kosovo's final status is to be established. UNSCR 1244 doesn't say that Kosovo's final status has to be mutually agreed and nowhere does it say that a unilateral decision is forbidden either. Serbia already tried to unilaterally finalise Kosovo's status with their 2006 constitution, look where that got Serbia with Kosovo. And if what Kosovo did wasn't legal, then why doesn't someone do something about it? Not a single world organisation or court will ever rule that what Kosovo did was illegal because it wasn't.

Where you went wrong, is that you considered UNSCR 1244 to be a permanent guarantee and it wasn't/ isn't. Even Serbia realises that now. UNSCR 1244 is so pointless these days, Serbian politicians don't even bother to mention it anymore.

Zzzzzzz...

"the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija"

Is this suppose to scare anyone? Whether its the Kps or a pitchfork equiped albanian army its no match for Kosovo serbs.

"95% of Kosova's population is and has been Albanian....Welcome to the age of democracy!!!"
(Rocky, 9 July 2013 16:29)

Yes, 95% has been Albanian - but only after some 100.000-200.000 Serbs were driven out.

P.S: The unique Kosovarian democracy is when 115% of the voters voted for Thaci :)

"What kind of message is NATO sending to Serbia when it allows this," Palalić asked

Why don't you tell us, Mr. Palacic?

Thanks to the sharps eyes of the DSS for picking this up. We should keep an eye on this relationship between the Kosovo Albanians and the Albanian national military to see if there is a past that goes to the nineties. The Albanian nationals may be complicit in war crimes.

It's only a matter of time before NATO and it's big stick will fall apart and break so all of this is irrelevant, who the hell is scared of the bloody Albanian army anyway, who are they and what have they ever done????? Albanian army, what a joke!!

Everything is permanent until it is supeseded by something else. Now what superseded Res. 1244?
I do agree that the latest agreement is heading in that direction but you cannot say that Res 1244 doesn't matter any longer.
(Peggy, 11 July 2013 01:20)

I suppose I'm going to have to repeat myself again.

Kosovo's independence followed UNSCR 1244.

UNSCR 1244 doesn't say that a unilateral decision is forbidden. In fact it doesn't even say that both parties have to agree on Kosovo's final status, this is why Serbia tried to unilaterally finalise Kosovo's status and failed.

I can say that UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more and I have said it!

I'll repeat it again for you.

UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!

Nobody sould be surprised about this agreement. It is another step to the project called "Great Albania". It is very big DANGEROUS for whole Balcan Peninsula.

Serbs need to be conditioned? LOL 63% of Serbia says Kosovo is an independent nation!

Neither Kosovo, nor Albania has ever threatened the territorial integrity of any country in the region, including Serbia.
=======================================
This is priceless!

The conditions for Kosovo set out by UNSCR 1244 only applied whilst Kosovo's final status was yet to be established, however this occurred over five years ago.
(Ian, UK, 9 July 2013 21:12)
===============================
According to which body that actually matters, UN?
UDI doesn't count unless you have backing and as I see it majority of the world doesn't see it that way?

You can declare whatever you like but it won't necessarily come true unless you get it through legal channels.
Now I agree that the Serbian government is slowly making that happen, but it hasn't happened yet.

Peggy there you go again with your "the majority of the world doesn't see it that way"

Kosova has over 101 worldwide recognitions.

Get yourself a dictionairy and learn the definition of MAJORITY PLEASE.

This way you can stop embarassing yourself.

To the resident of NB Canada...are you 12 years old ???

To resident of Fredericton,New Brunswick,Canada....

I have asked you if you where 12 years old because it seems as if you came out of an egg explaining why you thought it was natural for the same people to unite and live in the same country,this way you have described the all crucial problem and the wars in the Balkans...

@Vlad:

Am I 12 years old?? No I'm not so therefore I'm not sure why you are asking me such a rather unusual question.

Where you went wrong, is that you considered UNSCR 1244 to be a permanent guarantee and it wasn't/ isn't. Even Serbia realises that now. UNSCR 1244 is so pointless these days, Serbian politicians don't even bother to mention it anymore.
(Ian, UK, 10 July 2013 15:39)
==============================
Everything is permanent until it is supeseded by something else. Now what superseded Res. 1244?
I do agree that the latest agreement is heading in that direction but you cannot say that Res 1244 doesn't matter any longer.

UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
(Ian, UK, 11 July 2013 11:06)
==========================
Keep repeating it but don't forget to put your ruby shoes on too.
It matters until it is replaced with another agreement.

"During question time in parliament on Tuesday, he said that the agreement makes it possible for the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija, and asked whether this means that that they will be able to "stay in north Kosovo and finish the job that the Kosovo forces cannot.""

Come on, he should calm down and probably read and be inspired by the comments of the true Serbs patriots in these forums that Serbs are heroic and macho and the coward Albanians are no match for them. So there is nothing for him to worry about.

Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
(Peggy, 9 July 2013 23:19)

Well, Serbia thinks otherwise... And I don't mean the current traitorous government, but Slobodan's very patriotic one which said (on video) that UNSCR 1244 opens up the possibility of the secession of KiM from Serbia and the FRY.

This way you can stop embarassing yourself.
(azir, 11 July 2013 16:26)
======================
I am not talking about those sellout governments who go against their people's wishes. I am talking about the population of those countries.
Stop embarrassing yourself.

Get over it already! Kosova is no longer a part of Serbia, this should have been clear to Serbia for the past 13 years now! How in the world do you expect to stop Kosovar Albanian cooperation, in this or any other area? 95% of Kosova's population is and has been Albanian, so why wouldn't they put these agreements in place, because some still believe that Serbian has sovereignty over Kosova? Keep dreaming, those days are forever gone! Welcome to the age of democracy!!!

Kosova was liberated and protected by NATO and Albania as a member continues to follow this.........

Serbia has no business involving itself in these foreign affairs.

Stressing that the agreement jeopardizes Serbia's territorial integrity

How is possible to jeopardize Serbia's territory, since Kosova have no intention what so ever to meddle in Serbian territory!?

"the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija"

Is this suppose to scare anyone? Whether its the Kps or a pitchfork equiped albanian army its no match for Kosovo serbs.

Zzzzzzz...

If you ask me why I think it's natural (though some may be in disagreement) that a Albania-Kosovo deal is or can be in the "works" so to speak is because these countries can naturally feel a kinship with one another even though it was Serbia(not Albania) that was Kosovo's "parent" country.Think about it the Albanian language is the official language in both of these countries,in the duration of the Kosovo conflict of the late 1990s I believe that numerous amount of ethnic Albanians fled to Albania to escape the conflict and that Albania is one of the nations that recognize Kosovo's sovereignty.

During question time in parliament on Tuesday, he he said that the agreement makes it possible for the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija, and asked whether this means that that they will be able to "stay in north Kosovo and finish the job that the Kosovo forces cannot."

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.

I'm sure NATO supports this deal.

"95% of Kosova's population is and has been Albanian....Welcome to the age of democracy!!!"
(Rocky, 9 July 2013 16:29)

Yes, 95% has been Albanian - but only after some 100.000-200.000 Serbs were driven out.

P.S: The unique Kosovarian democracy is when 115% of the voters voted for Thaci :)

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson )

That's questionable. According to UN1244, Serb parallel institutions in north kosovo are illegal. Serbia was the first country to violate 1244.

I don't think Serbia has the right to demand anything when it comes to the agreement between two other countries.
Neither Kosovo, nor Albania has ever threatened the territorial integrity of any country in the region, including Serbia.
Serbia is free to sign similar agreements with other countries in the region... oh, wait a minute... no Balkan country could trust Serbia when it comes to such matters.

Nobody sould be surprised about this agreement. It is another step to the project called "Great Albania". It is very big DANGEROUS for whole Balcan Peninsula.

Thanks to the sharps eyes of the DSS for picking this up. We should keep an eye on this relationship between the Kosovo Albanians and the Albanian national military to see if there is a past that goes to the nineties. The Albanian nationals may be complicit in war crimes.

Neither Kosovo, nor Albania has ever threatened the territorial integrity of any country in the region, including Serbia.
=======================================
This is priceless!

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson, 9 July 2013 16:58)

The conditions for Kosovo set out by UNSCR 1244 only applied whilst Kosovo's final status was yet to be established, however this occurred over five years ago.

The conditions for Kosovo set out by UNSCR 1244 only applied whilst Kosovo's final status was yet to be established, however this occurred over five years ago.
(Ian, UK, 9 July 2013 21:12)
===============================
According to which body that actually matters, UN?
UDI doesn't count unless you have backing and as I see it majority of the world doesn't see it that way?

You can declare whatever you like but it won't necessarily come true unless you get it through legal channels.
Now I agree that the Serbian government is slowly making that happen, but it hasn't happened yet.

"What kind of message is NATO sending to Serbia when it allows this," Palalić asked

Why don't you tell us, Mr. Palacic?

To the resident of NB Canada...are you 12 years old ???

It's only a matter of time before NATO and it's big stick will fall apart and break so all of this is irrelevant, who the hell is scared of the bloody Albanian army anyway, who are they and what have they ever done????? Albanian army, what a joke!!

UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
(Ian, UK, 11 July 2013 11:06)
==========================
Keep repeating it but don't forget to put your ruby shoes on too.
It matters until it is replaced with another agreement.

That's questionable. According to UN1244, KFOR troops are the only allowed armed forces to be present in the territory of Kosovo.
(Comm. Parrisson, 9 July 2013 16:58)
==============================
Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
Res. 1244 is not worth much these days when it comes to NATO.

Serbian government has signed Kosovo away. It's going to take some time to condition Serbs to it, but it has already happened.

Where you went wrong, is that you considered UNSCR 1244 to be a permanent guarantee and it wasn't/ isn't. Even Serbia realises that now. UNSCR 1244 is so pointless these days, Serbian politicians don't even bother to mention it anymore.
(Ian, UK, 10 July 2013 15:39)
==============================
Everything is permanent until it is supeseded by something else. Now what superseded Res. 1244?
I do agree that the latest agreement is heading in that direction but you cannot say that Res 1244 doesn't matter any longer.

Everything is permanent until it is supeseded by something else. Now what superseded Res. 1244?
I do agree that the latest agreement is heading in that direction but you cannot say that Res 1244 doesn't matter any longer.
(Peggy, 11 July 2013 01:20)

I suppose I'm going to have to repeat myself again.

Kosovo's independence followed UNSCR 1244.

UNSCR 1244 doesn't say that a unilateral decision is forbidden. In fact it doesn't even say that both parties have to agree on Kosovo's final status, this is why Serbia tried to unilaterally finalise Kosovo's status and failed.

I can say that UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more and I have said it!

I'll repeat it again for you.

UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!
UNSCR 1244 doesn't matter any more!

To resident of Fredericton,New Brunswick,Canada....

I have asked you if you where 12 years old because it seems as if you came out of an egg explaining why you thought it was natural for the same people to unite and live in the same country,this way you have described the all crucial problem and the wars in the Balkans...

@Vlad:

Am I 12 years old?? No I'm not so therefore I'm not sure why you are asking me such a rather unusual question.

Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
Res. 1244 is not worth much these days when it comes to NATO.

Serbian government has signed Kosovo away. It's going to take some time to condition Serbs to it, but it has already happened.
(Peggy, 9 July 2013 23:19)

Where in UNSCR 1244 does it say Kosovo isn't allowed to be a separate country? It says that Kosovo is to be a sovereign part of FRY under UN governance whilst Kosovo's final status is to be established. UNSCR 1244 doesn't say that Kosovo's final status has to be mutually agreed and nowhere does it say that a unilateral decision is forbidden either. Serbia already tried to unilaterally finalise Kosovo's status with their 2006 constitution, look where that got Serbia with Kosovo. And if what Kosovo did wasn't legal, then why doesn't someone do something about it? Not a single world organisation or court will ever rule that what Kosovo did was illegal because it wasn't.

Where you went wrong, is that you considered UNSCR 1244 to be a permanent guarantee and it wasn't/ isn't. Even Serbia realises that now. UNSCR 1244 is so pointless these days, Serbian politicians don't even bother to mention it anymore.

Serbs need to be conditioned? LOL 63% of Serbia says Kosovo is an independent nation!

Peggy there you go again with your "the majority of the world doesn't see it that way"

Kosova has over 101 worldwide recognitions.

Get yourself a dictionairy and learn the definition of MAJORITY PLEASE.

This way you can stop embarassing yourself.

This way you can stop embarassing yourself.
(azir, 11 July 2013 16:26)
======================
I am not talking about those sellout governments who go against their people's wishes. I am talking about the population of those countries.
Stop embarrassing yourself.

"During question time in parliament on Tuesday, he said that the agreement makes it possible for the Albanian military to be present in Kosovo and Metohija, and asked whether this means that that they will be able to "stay in north Kosovo and finish the job that the Kosovo forces cannot.""

Come on, he should calm down and probably read and be inspired by the comments of the true Serbs patriots in these forums that Serbs are heroic and macho and the coward Albanians are no match for them. So there is nothing for him to worry about.

Res.1244 also doesn't allow Kosovo to be a separate country and yet here we are, separate and recognised by most NATO member states. Once NATO in who is going to throw them out?
(Peggy, 9 July 2013 23:19)

Well, Serbia thinks otherwise... And I don't mean the current traitorous government, but Slobodan's very patriotic one which said (on video) that UNSCR 1244 opens up the possibility of the secession of KiM from Serbia and the FRY.