"EU could give its interpretation of Brussels agreement"

"EU could give its interpretation"
Really??

Is this the same EU that supported the bombing of Serbia?
Is this the same EU that supports the illegal succession and theft of Kosovo?
Is this the same EU that destroyed evidence with regards to organ trafficking?

Yeah, getting the EU interpretation would be a great idea...i wonder they would side with?

Thee DSS is, of course, correct in its assumption that the EU and Albanians see the treacherous agreement signed by Dacic as de facto recognition of Kosovo independence. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, simply, foolish. The ruling government has sold out Serbs and Serbian Heritage in KiM for hoped for "crumbs" caste out by the failed or failing European Union.

Drecun, an MP of the ruling SNS party, sees the cause for such announcements "in the behavior of Priština."


It is not Prishtina, rather is Belgrade trying to twist things around to its liking. When will you guys learn to be honest once in your lifetime?

Took 135 years but Serbia is back under the heel of an empire again when it has to look to supranational entities for the application of law within its own territory. 99 years ago Serbia rejected the Austrian ultimatum on the grounds of sovereign application of law but now seems ready to sign that away at the behest of a few German bankers.

So Drecun negotiates an agreement with Albanians and 2 weeks later they don't agree on what they agreed to? Was that the intent from the beginning to have EU decide so Nikolic and Dacic can say "not our fault"? Or just a sheer incompetence of this regime?
If they don't agree what the agreement says then they need to start from scratch, not ask EU to tell them what to do. This government is behaving like a bunch of kids.

If the Albanians and Serbians dont agree,
what Possibly could EU do ?

Arn.

The agreement was made in English language, why would they interpret differently.

It's you that is interpreting differently.

With this agreement Serbia is pulling off the parallel system and they are incorporating under constitution of Kosovo.

(So sad, Too bad, 14 May 2013 17:26)
# Comment link

You are incorrect... Carla Del Ponte, a prosecutor of ICTY, destroyed this "evidence". This court of law is not part of EU but part of the UN institution.

Next time you make a heart-felt message at least be correct half-way.


Tung,

EU could give its interpretation"
Really??

Is this the same EU that supported the bombing of Serbia?
Is this the same EU that supports the illegal succession and theft of Kosovo?
Is this the same EU that destroyed evidence with regards to organ trafficking?

Yeah, getting the EU interpretation would be a great idea...i wonder they would side with?
(So sad, Too bad, 14 May 2013 17:26)
Maybe, I can explain it on terms you can understand.
Most EU countries did agree to the bombing of Serbia to end the senseless and horrific violence inflicted by Serbia on the Albanian people, probably saving hundreds of thousands of lives.
It is the same EU that is following UNSC 1244 that stripped Serbia of all control of Kosovo and allowed for a determination of a future status of Kosovo.
EU had nothing to do with the UN court that catalogued and photographed evidence for any future reference and then destroyed materials that would have been difficult to store from an investigation that yielded nothing.
It is the same EU that Serbia desperately wants to join, and the third party at the negotiations, so in the matter of disagreement to what was agreed the only real source to settle the matter.

This is truly comical. The Serbs failed at negotiating with themselves when Vucic was not able to convince N-Kosova Serbs that the agreement made with Prishtina gave control of ALL of Kosova to the Albanians. Now the Serbs are trying to get the EU into an argument about what the agreement actually says. I guess the Serbs think they can interpret the English version (only version) better than Baroness Ashton.

I guess the Serbs think they can interpret the English version (only version) better than Baroness Ashton.
(The Count of Kosova, 14 May 2013 21:25)
================================

Do you think that Kate gets more credibility because there is a Baroness in front of her name? That title somehow makes her smarter or more important?
How about Serbia drags her royals out and gets them to say that Kosovo is not independent, would you think that because someome with a title siad it it must be so?

The EU can interpret the artistic lines of WCs if it wants. It still doesn't make it either fair or impartial. In the case of Kosovo, expect neither according to their interpretation so far of 'good neighbourly relations', stretched to the limit, wrapped around a viennese pretzel and coated in chocolate being licked by a baby eating rottweiler. You would have thought they had learned a basic lesson with Bg and Ro, but they still refuse to.

If Serbia ever gets a date to start talks with the EU, they will then be presented with other conditions before they can be an EU member. One of those conditions will be to join NATO. This will set back Serbia for another ten years. It seems that the Serbs are so desperate to enter the EU that they fail to see they are being played for fools. We all remember being told as children: "If you eat your spinach you will grow up to be as strong as Popeye".

For those that have had little association with governments let me tell you this. The EU’s interpretation is meaningless even though I can hazard a guess which way it will go. I have my interpretation as others have on this forum and what will it mean for the EU to have its interpretation? NOTHING AT ALL.

This is only the westerns showing their utter frustration at this “done deal” sailing south into nothingness. Remember what Serbia’s EU Minister said to the school kids “don’t expect money from Brussels upon joining the EU as it has none left, we have to work hard to achieve a good standard of living”.

This is not the end game of the agreement yet, but it’s not too far away either. Remember this was to be packaged up in a week or two at the most and delivered to Brussels. It is now dragging on and on and their little servants in Belgrade are not delivering, nor can they deliver, LOL.

Why not, if it will speed up the whole process of implementation of the agreement

For those that have had little association with governments let me tell you this. The EU’s interpretation is meaningless even though I can hazard a guess which way it will go. I have my interpretation as others have on this forum and what will it mean for the EU to have its interpretation? NOTHING AT ALL.
(sj, 15 May 2013 04:00)

Thanks sj. It’s great to see that beside being the CE of B92 forums you’ll quickly become the Chief Government Expert, as well.
----------

This is only the westerns showing their utter frustration at this “done deal” sailing south into nothingness. Remember what Serbia’s EU Minister said to the school kids “don’t expect money from Brussels upon joining the EU as it has none left, we have to work hard to achieve a good standard of living”.

This is not the end game of the agreement yet, but it’s not too far away either. Remember this was to be packaged up in a week or two at the most and delivered to Brussels. It is now dragging on and on and their little servants in Belgrade are not delivering, nor can they deliver, LOL.
(sj, 15 May 2013 04:00)

I agree. Kosovo is sabotaging it without exposing itself as the deal breaker. Serbia not joining the EU is probably the only thing where you and Kosovo converge, albeit for different reasons.

Drecun, an MP of the ruling SNS party, sees the cause for such announcements "in the behavior of Priština."


It is not Prishtina, rather is Belgrade trying to twist things around to its liking. When will you guys learn to be honest once in your lifetime?

This is truly comical. The Serbs failed at negotiating with themselves when Vucic was not able to convince N-Kosova Serbs that the agreement made with Prishtina gave control of ALL of Kosova to the Albanians. Now the Serbs are trying to get the EU into an argument about what the agreement actually says. I guess the Serbs think they can interpret the English version (only version) better than Baroness Ashton.

"EU could give its interpretation"
Really??

Is this the same EU that supported the bombing of Serbia?
Is this the same EU that supports the illegal succession and theft of Kosovo?
Is this the same EU that destroyed evidence with regards to organ trafficking?

Yeah, getting the EU interpretation would be a great idea...i wonder they would side with?

The agreement was made in English language, why would they interpret differently.

It's you that is interpreting differently.

With this agreement Serbia is pulling off the parallel system and they are incorporating under constitution of Kosovo.

(So sad, Too bad, 14 May 2013 17:26)
# Comment link

You are incorrect... Carla Del Ponte, a prosecutor of ICTY, destroyed this "evidence". This court of law is not part of EU but part of the UN institution.

Next time you make a heart-felt message at least be correct half-way.


Tung,

EU could give its interpretation"
Really??

Is this the same EU that supported the bombing of Serbia?
Is this the same EU that supports the illegal succession and theft of Kosovo?
Is this the same EU that destroyed evidence with regards to organ trafficking?

Yeah, getting the EU interpretation would be a great idea...i wonder they would side with?
(So sad, Too bad, 14 May 2013 17:26)
Maybe, I can explain it on terms you can understand.
Most EU countries did agree to the bombing of Serbia to end the senseless and horrific violence inflicted by Serbia on the Albanian people, probably saving hundreds of thousands of lives.
It is the same EU that is following UNSC 1244 that stripped Serbia of all control of Kosovo and allowed for a determination of a future status of Kosovo.
EU had nothing to do with the UN court that catalogued and photographed evidence for any future reference and then destroyed materials that would have been difficult to store from an investigation that yielded nothing.
It is the same EU that Serbia desperately wants to join, and the third party at the negotiations, so in the matter of disagreement to what was agreed the only real source to settle the matter.

If the Albanians and Serbians dont agree,
what Possibly could EU do ?

Arn.

Thee DSS is, of course, correct in its assumption that the EU and Albanians see the treacherous agreement signed by Dacic as de facto recognition of Kosovo independence. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, simply, foolish. The ruling government has sold out Serbs and Serbian Heritage in KiM for hoped for "crumbs" caste out by the failed or failing European Union.

For those that have had little association with governments let me tell you this. The EU’s interpretation is meaningless even though I can hazard a guess which way it will go. I have my interpretation as others have on this forum and what will it mean for the EU to have its interpretation? NOTHING AT ALL.

This is only the westerns showing their utter frustration at this “done deal” sailing south into nothingness. Remember what Serbia’s EU Minister said to the school kids “don’t expect money from Brussels upon joining the EU as it has none left, we have to work hard to achieve a good standard of living”.

This is not the end game of the agreement yet, but it’s not too far away either. Remember this was to be packaged up in a week or two at the most and delivered to Brussels. It is now dragging on and on and their little servants in Belgrade are not delivering, nor can they deliver, LOL.

So Drecun negotiates an agreement with Albanians and 2 weeks later they don't agree on what they agreed to? Was that the intent from the beginning to have EU decide so Nikolic and Dacic can say "not our fault"? Or just a sheer incompetence of this regime?
If they don't agree what the agreement says then they need to start from scratch, not ask EU to tell them what to do. This government is behaving like a bunch of kids.

I guess the Serbs think they can interpret the English version (only version) better than Baroness Ashton.
(The Count of Kosova, 14 May 2013 21:25)
================================

Do you think that Kate gets more credibility because there is a Baroness in front of her name? That title somehow makes her smarter or more important?
How about Serbia drags her royals out and gets them to say that Kosovo is not independent, would you think that because someome with a title siad it it must be so?

Took 135 years but Serbia is back under the heel of an empire again when it has to look to supranational entities for the application of law within its own territory. 99 years ago Serbia rejected the Austrian ultimatum on the grounds of sovereign application of law but now seems ready to sign that away at the behest of a few German bankers.

Why not, if it will speed up the whole process of implementation of the agreement

If Serbia ever gets a date to start talks with the EU, they will then be presented with other conditions before they can be an EU member. One of those conditions will be to join NATO. This will set back Serbia for another ten years. It seems that the Serbs are so desperate to enter the EU that they fail to see they are being played for fools. We all remember being told as children: "If you eat your spinach you will grow up to be as strong as Popeye".

The EU can interpret the artistic lines of WCs if it wants. It still doesn't make it either fair or impartial. In the case of Kosovo, expect neither according to their interpretation so far of 'good neighbourly relations', stretched to the limit, wrapped around a viennese pretzel and coated in chocolate being licked by a baby eating rottweiler. You would have thought they had learned a basic lesson with Bg and Ro, but they still refuse to.

For those that have had little association with governments let me tell you this. The EU’s interpretation is meaningless even though I can hazard a guess which way it will go. I have my interpretation as others have on this forum and what will it mean for the EU to have its interpretation? NOTHING AT ALL.
(sj, 15 May 2013 04:00)

Thanks sj. It’s great to see that beside being the CE of B92 forums you’ll quickly become the Chief Government Expert, as well.
----------

This is only the westerns showing their utter frustration at this “done deal” sailing south into nothingness. Remember what Serbia’s EU Minister said to the school kids “don’t expect money from Brussels upon joining the EU as it has none left, we have to work hard to achieve a good standard of living”.

This is not the end game of the agreement yet, but it’s not too far away either. Remember this was to be packaged up in a week or two at the most and delivered to Brussels. It is now dragging on and on and their little servants in Belgrade are not delivering, nor can they deliver, LOL.
(sj, 15 May 2013 04:00)

I agree. Kosovo is sabotaging it without exposing itself as the deal breaker. Serbia not joining the EU is probably the only thing where you and Kosovo converge, albeit for different reasons.