“Downgraded ties with Hague Tribunal won’t hurt Serbia”

We have the Evidence that Britain, America, France, and Germany has committed Genocide against Serbia in the past, and Britain, France, and Germany continues to commit Genocide, by blackmailing and pressuring Serbia with Economic Genocide if Serbia will not submit to Physical and Cultural Genocide, by giving away Serbia’s Province of Kosovo.

I favour slapping a Genocide Lawsuit on Germany, with other Countries like Britain, France, and America as Always Easily next for a Genocide Lawsuit Filed against them.

When the Hague refused to find NATO guilty of war crimes against humanity for using depl. Uran. missiles, Serbia should have end association with the Hague right there.

"He said that Serbia, despite the great injustice it suffered, could not completely cut its ties with the Tribunal.

“The state is not in a position to make such a radical move. That is why we will just continue to submit the necessary documents to the prosecution and to defense teams of our indictees,” Ljajić was quoted as saying."

Perhaps Ljajić could develop on this topic and explain us WHY !
WHY could Serbia not completely cut its ties with the Tribunal?
What does he mean by: “The state is not in a position to make such a radical move."?

What is the matter with these Serb Politicians?co-operation with that obcenity of a tribunal should never have been on their agenda,after all that has been done to the Serbs by the Imperialists they still persist with the EU and the Hague nonsense,also they should have had nothing to do with KFOR and Eulex who are nothing but an occupation force.

"I favour slapping a Genocide Lawsuit on Germany, with other Countries like Britain, France, and America as Always Easily next for a Genocide Lawsuit Filed against them."
(Yet Another J S, 24 November 2012 13:15)

Some people seem to have not the slightest idea of what genocide is. I recommend Wikipedia, for a start!

When the Hague refused to find NATO guilty of war crimes against humanity for using depl. Uran. missiles, Serbia should have end association with the Hague right there.
(Ryan M, 24 November 2012 14:01)

Interesting because it was the Serb heroe of international justice Del Ponte who reviewed the NATO acts and decided not to issue an indictement.
http://www.icty.org/sid/7846

Rasim Ljajić has informed us that Serbia will reduce cooperation with The Hague Tribunal to the lowest possible technical level because 3 out of 5 judges have acquitted Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač.
All very well but don't you think that his (and Serbia's) frustration should be directed at judges Theodor Meron (US), Patrick Robinson (Jamaica) and Mehmet Guney (Turkey) rather than the at the tribunal.
The tribunal itself is an institution set up to deal with bringing those, who have committed crimes against humanity to face justice. The institution is not to blame, just as Serbia's courts, laws and constitution can not be blamed for the sometimes corrupt practices which go on within its boundaries.
Just as Serbia is fighting corruption within its own borders Serbia should embrace this opportunity to be more involved with the tribunal rather than less. Seeking more involvement as a result of this incidental, and in Serbia's eyes unfortunate, ruling will show a grown-up and legitimate approach to making the tribunal better, stronger and more legitimate. Rasim Ljajić response is childish and inappropriate and does little to further promote the good that this tribunal has so far managed to achieve.

We have the Evidence that Britain, America, France, and Germany has committed Genocide against Serbia in the past, and Britain, France, and Germany continues to commit Genocide, by blackmailing and pressuring Serbia with Economic Genocide if Serbia will not submit to Physical and Cultural Genocide, by giving away Serbia’s Province of Kosovo.

I favour slapping a Genocide Lawsuit on Germany, with other Countries like Britain, France, and America as Always Easily next for a Genocide Lawsuit Filed against them.

When the Hague refused to find NATO guilty of war crimes against humanity for using depl. Uran. missiles, Serbia should have end association with the Hague right there.

"I favour slapping a Genocide Lawsuit on Germany, with other Countries like Britain, France, and America as Always Easily next for a Genocide Lawsuit Filed against them."
(Yet Another J S, 24 November 2012 13:15)

Some people seem to have not the slightest idea of what genocide is. I recommend Wikipedia, for a start!

What is the matter with these Serb Politicians?co-operation with that obcenity of a tribunal should never have been on their agenda,after all that has been done to the Serbs by the Imperialists they still persist with the EU and the Hague nonsense,also they should have had nothing to do with KFOR and Eulex who are nothing but an occupation force.

Rasim Ljajić has informed us that Serbia will reduce cooperation with The Hague Tribunal to the lowest possible technical level because 3 out of 5 judges have acquitted Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač.
All very well but don't you think that his (and Serbia's) frustration should be directed at judges Theodor Meron (US), Patrick Robinson (Jamaica) and Mehmet Guney (Turkey) rather than the at the tribunal.
The tribunal itself is an institution set up to deal with bringing those, who have committed crimes against humanity to face justice. The institution is not to blame, just as Serbia's courts, laws and constitution can not be blamed for the sometimes corrupt practices which go on within its boundaries.
Just as Serbia is fighting corruption within its own borders Serbia should embrace this opportunity to be more involved with the tribunal rather than less. Seeking more involvement as a result of this incidental, and in Serbia's eyes unfortunate, ruling will show a grown-up and legitimate approach to making the tribunal better, stronger and more legitimate. Rasim Ljajić response is childish and inappropriate and does little to further promote the good that this tribunal has so far managed to achieve.

"He said that Serbia, despite the great injustice it suffered, could not completely cut its ties with the Tribunal.

“The state is not in a position to make such a radical move. That is why we will just continue to submit the necessary documents to the prosecution and to defense teams of our indictees,” Ljajić was quoted as saying."

Perhaps Ljajić could develop on this topic and explain us WHY !
WHY could Serbia not completely cut its ties with the Tribunal?
What does he mean by: “The state is not in a position to make such a radical move."?

When the Hague refused to find NATO guilty of war crimes against humanity for using depl. Uran. missiles, Serbia should have end association with the Hague right there.
(Ryan M, 24 November 2012 14:01)

Interesting because it was the Serb heroe of international justice Del Ponte who reviewed the NATO acts and decided not to issue an indictement.
http://www.icty.org/sid/7846