2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
(EU/KS Referendum, 11 October 2012 02:55)
I was inadvertently read an old Document titled, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011; and I found the correct Document Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013.
I should copied and pasted the words Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013 using Google, rather than using accelerators like Search with Bing, and that is why I could not find that particular reference, because it was an older Document.
Head of the EU Delegation to Serbia Vincent Degert handed the report to Dačić who said he was “upset” by it and that it was unacceptable to mention “Kosovo’s territorial integrity” in the official EU documents.
-- First- you already accepted it.
Second- you are not in the EU so you it is not up to you to decide what is acceptable to write in EU documents written by EU
Third- Kosova's integrity is defended by UN resolution, NATO forces and kumanovo's agreement.
Fourth- the reason you were bombed is because you thought you could do whatever you wanted with Kosova.
Where is Comm. Parrisson to defend the "unbiased and status-neutral" EU now?
Every right minded Serb knows that the EU not only supports an independent Kosovo but also sponsors it politically and financially. It's clear as day, Serbia will never be admitted into the EU until it recognizes (or as they say 'normalize relations' with) Kosovo. Trust me, not all of us are so naive to believe otherwise.
The choice is clear:
1) Stick to basic principle and defend our territorial integrity and sovereignty by any means necessary.
or
2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
These mixed messages remind me, of an escort that tells you and every one around how great you are wile they fleece you out of your hard work and property...look east my friends ...look east...
I could not find it, and it is the European Union’s way of telling the Albanians that they will be awarded autonomy in their own Assigned Areas, while the Serbian People will be ruled from Belgrade.
The Kumanovo Agreement will be scrapped, and the Serbian army will be back at Serbian Areas, and any other Legitimate Area.
Albania was given European Union Candidate Status to prove these things, and reality is slowly but finally sinking in for the Albanians.
I only found one reference to the Republic of Srpska in relation to the words territorial integrity in that Document.
Euro-America could be interested in Georgia’s territorial integrity, because this is more important to Euro-America, because Abkhazia could have Oil, Gas, Marine Resources, Precious Metals, and Rare Earths.
Russia and Georgia could become a loose Confederation of Countries, where South Ossetia will join Russia, and Abkhazia will have High Autonomy as part of Georgia because of the Marine Resources, where Georgia can join the EU, but will not join NATO, because Russia will protect Georgia, with Military Bases in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
Russia can make those Territories Independent Countries, and Russia can Veto them from becoming Countries, and South Ossetia and Abkhazia have earned the right to become Independent, because Genocide was committed on them by Georgia, whereas, Kosovo was a Bogus Humanitarian Intervention, and so Albanians will have Autonomy in their own Areas.
"Addressing the problems in northern Kosovo, while respecting the territorial integrity of Kosovo and the particular needs of the local population, will be an essential element of this process”.
So, autonomy for the north, Pristina's recognition of what it likes to call "parallel institutions" as the legitimate structures of government in what can only be a separately functioning entity, expanded rights of self administration of already designated and mandated Serb and other non-Albanian municipalities south the Ibar, and the open-ended issue of Serbia's non-required "recognition" followed by an indefinite date for Kosovo's EU membership, which can easily be further conditioned?
I could not find it, and it is the European Union’s way of telling the Albanians that they will be awarded autonomy in their own Assigned Areas, while the Serbian People will be ruled from Belgrade.
The Kumanovo Agreement will be scrapped, and the Serbian army will be back at Serbian Areas, and any other Legitimate Area.
Albania was given European Union Candidate Status to prove these things, and reality is slowly but finally sinking in for the Albanians.
I only found one reference to the Republic of Srpska in relation to the words territorial integrity in that Document.
Euro-America could be interested in Georgia’s territorial integrity, because this is more important to Euro-America, because Abkhazia could have Oil, Gas, Marine Resources, Precious Metals, and Rare Earths.
Russia and Georgia could become a loose Confederation of Countries, where South Ossetia will join Russia, and Abkhazia will have High Autonomy as part of Georgia because of the Marine Resources, where Georgia can join the EU, but will not join NATO, because Russia will protect Georgia, with Military Bases in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
Russia can make those Territories Independent Countries, and Russia can Veto them from becoming Countries, and South Ossetia and Abkhazia have earned the right to become Independent, because Genocide was committed on them by Georgia, whereas, Kosovo was a Bogus Humanitarian Intervention, and so Albanians will have Autonomy in their own Areas.
These mixed messages remind me, of an escort that tells you and every one around how great you are wile they fleece you out of your hard work and property...look east my friends ...look east...
"Addressing the problems in northern Kosovo, while respecting the territorial integrity of Kosovo and the particular needs of the local population, will be an essential element of this process”.
So, autonomy for the north, Pristina's recognition of what it likes to call "parallel institutions" as the legitimate structures of government in what can only be a separately functioning entity, expanded rights of self administration of already designated and mandated Serb and other non-Albanian municipalities south the Ibar, and the open-ended issue of Serbia's non-required "recognition" followed by an indefinite date for Kosovo's EU membership, which can easily be further conditioned?
Where is Comm. Parrisson to defend the "unbiased and status-neutral" EU now?
Every right minded Serb knows that the EU not only supports an independent Kosovo but also sponsors it politically and financially. It's clear as day, Serbia will never be admitted into the EU until it recognizes (or as they say 'normalize relations' with) Kosovo. Trust me, not all of us are so naive to believe otherwise.
The choice is clear:
1) Stick to basic principle and defend our territorial integrity and sovereignty by any means necessary.
or
2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
(EU/KS Referendum, 11 October 2012 02:55)
Head of the EU Delegation to Serbia Vincent Degert handed the report to Dačić who said he was “upset” by it and that it was unacceptable to mention “Kosovo’s territorial integrity” in the official EU documents.
-- First- you already accepted it.
Second- you are not in the EU so you it is not up to you to decide what is acceptable to write in EU documents written by EU
Third- Kosova's integrity is defended by UN resolution, NATO forces and kumanovo's agreement.
Fourth- the reason you were bombed is because you thought you could do whatever you wanted with Kosova.
I was inadvertently read an old Document titled, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011; and I found the correct Document Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013.
I should copied and pasted the words Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013 using Google, rather than using accelerators like Search with Bing, and that is why I could not find that particular reference, because it was an older Document.
I could not find it, and it is the European Union’s way of telling the Albanians that they will be awarded autonomy in their own Assigned Areas, while the Serbian People will be ruled from Belgrade.
The Kumanovo Agreement will be scrapped, and the Serbian army will be back at Serbian Areas, and any other Legitimate Area.
Albania was given European Union Candidate Status to prove these things, and reality is slowly but finally sinking in for the Albanians.
I only found one reference to the Republic of Srpska in relation to the words territorial integrity in that Document.
Euro-America could be interested in Georgia’s territorial integrity, because this is more important to Euro-America, because Abkhazia could have Oil, Gas, Marine Resources, Precious Metals, and Rare Earths.
Russia and Georgia could become a loose Confederation of Countries, where South Ossetia will join Russia, and Abkhazia will have High Autonomy as part of Georgia because of the Marine Resources, where Georgia can join the EU, but will not join NATO, because Russia will protect Georgia, with Military Bases in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
Russia can make those Territories Independent Countries, and Russia can Veto them from becoming Countries, and South Ossetia and Abkhazia have earned the right to become Independent, because Genocide was committed on them by Georgia, whereas, Kosovo was a Bogus Humanitarian Intervention, and so Albanians will have Autonomy in their own Areas.
"Addressing the problems in northern Kosovo, while respecting the territorial integrity of Kosovo and the particular needs of the local population, will be an essential element of this process”.
So, autonomy for the north, Pristina's recognition of what it likes to call "parallel institutions" as the legitimate structures of government in what can only be a separately functioning entity, expanded rights of self administration of already designated and mandated Serb and other non-Albanian municipalities south the Ibar, and the open-ended issue of Serbia's non-required "recognition" followed by an indefinite date for Kosovo's EU membership, which can easily be further conditioned?
These mixed messages remind me, of an escort that tells you and every one around how great you are wile they fleece you out of your hard work and property...look east my friends ...look east...
Where is Comm. Parrisson to defend the "unbiased and status-neutral" EU now?
Every right minded Serb knows that the EU not only supports an independent Kosovo but also sponsors it politically and financially. It's clear as day, Serbia will never be admitted into the EU until it recognizes (or as they say 'normalize relations' with) Kosovo. Trust me, not all of us are so naive to believe otherwise.
The choice is clear:
1) Stick to basic principle and defend our territorial integrity and sovereignty by any means necessary.
or
2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
2) Submit, recognize Kosovo in which case we might join the EU (someday), with about as much respect as a banana republic.
(EU/KS Referendum, 11 October 2012 02:55)
Head of the EU Delegation to Serbia Vincent Degert handed the report to Dačić who said he was “upset” by it and that it was unacceptable to mention “Kosovo’s territorial integrity” in the official EU documents.
-- First- you already accepted it.
Second- you are not in the EU so you it is not up to you to decide what is acceptable to write in EU documents written by EU
Third- Kosova's integrity is defended by UN resolution, NATO forces and kumanovo's agreement.
Fourth- the reason you were bombed is because you thought you could do whatever you wanted with Kosova.
I was inadvertently read an old Document titled, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011; and I found the correct Document Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013.
I should copied and pasted the words Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013 using Google, rather than using accelerators like Search with Bing, and that is why I could not find that particular reference, because it was an older Document.
IMAGE SOURCE
7 Komentari
Sortiraj po: