Constitution must be respected, president says

Strange, what goes around comes around. You took the independence of Kosovo to ICJ and when they tolld you that the independence of Kosovo was totally lawfull then you tried to be more clever than anyone and tried to changed the meaning of the outcome as to '' ICJ decision was only advise'' well if it was an advise only than why bother asking in the first place. You have given lessons to your people how to ignore court outcomes so now live with it. For the past few decades serbia has made 1 step forward and 3 backwards everytime politicians tried to make stupit decisions.

"You took the independence of Kosovo to ICJ and when they tolld you that the independence of Kosovo was totally lawfull then you tried to be more clever than anyone and tried to changed the meaning of the outcome as to '' ICJ decision was only advise'' "
(Arben, 21 July 2012 13:54)

Once again: The ICJ rulung was not about the legality of the independence or statehood of Kosovo, but about the legality of the DECLARATION of independence. Two different things, understand? And yes, the ICJ ruling is only advisory and not legally binding to anyone.

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.

(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

"122. The Court has concluded above that the adoption of the declaration of independence of 17 February 2008 did not violate general international law, Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) or the Constitutional Framework. Consequently the adoption of that declaration did not violate any applicable rule of international law."

If it didn't violate 1244 it should be fine with you since you Serbs are such fans of 1244. 1244 is upheld, Kosovo is independent and your point is?

Comm,

It was well understood that belgrade was asking the highest court of law to chime in on Kosovo's independence, full stop.

Stop back paddling.

What you're saying is the equivalent of, "we asked the court about the legality of the murderer to shoot in public -- not the subsequent murder that followed."

Sincerely,

"If someone say to recognise independence of Kosovo.....".....shoot them that is what Nikolic is trying to say....He also need a long rest.....

Comm,

Why diden't you serbs ask the "right" question then?

The declaration wich made Kosova independent was legal. It clearly means that Kosova independence is legal. You serbs just try to twist it up because you failed with you attemp at the ICJ.

You asked an question and the ICJ answered it. Why diden't you ask if Kosova statehood is legal Then ?

Once again: The ICJ rulung was not about the legality of the independence or statehood of Kosovo, but about the legality of the DECLARATION of independence. Two different things, understand? And yes, the ICJ ruling is only advisory and not legally binding to anyone.

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.
(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

Once again: ICJ ruling was about what SERBIA ASKED FOR, and not Kosovo! Quote: "Is the declaration of independence of Kosovo in line with international law?" And the answer was: "Yes!" If, and this is a very big if, you think that this answer was not enough then you have to address this to those who formulated the question. Kosovo fought against what Serbia was throwing and won unquestionably. Simple as that. Your eternal spinning regarding that is not changing anything..

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.
(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

it depends on the applicable law

You asked an question and the ICJ answered it. Why diden't you ask if Kosova statehood is legal Then ?
(Demi, 21 July 2012 19:31)

They may pretend stupid as long as they want. In reality they know that ICJ does not have mandate to determine anyone's statehood. If that was the case then any new country's membership would have to go through ICJ's verification.
Also, the UN membership is not necessary for a territory to be a country, because countries have established the UN, not UN the countries.

Do not spear in the air, the smell of the old ways in Kosovo!
The distinction is only in the new millennium!

The constitution of Serbia must be respected in the same way as the other countries respect the constitution of their own country. The Serbian president is right. Vojvodina can not be a state within a state. It can have autonomy and that's all. Decisions of the Constitutional Court must be respected and these decisions should not be commented.

Strange, what goes around comes around. You took the independence of Kosovo to ICJ and when they tolld you that the independence of Kosovo was totally lawfull then you tried to be more clever than anyone and tried to changed the meaning of the outcome as to '' ICJ decision was only advise'' well if it was an advise only than why bother asking in the first place. You have given lessons to your people how to ignore court outcomes so now live with it. For the past few decades serbia has made 1 step forward and 3 backwards everytime politicians tried to make stupit decisions.

"You took the independence of Kosovo to ICJ and when they tolld you that the independence of Kosovo was totally lawfull then you tried to be more clever than anyone and tried to changed the meaning of the outcome as to '' ICJ decision was only advise'' "
(Arben, 21 July 2012 13:54)

Once again: The ICJ rulung was not about the legality of the independence or statehood of Kosovo, but about the legality of the DECLARATION of independence. Two different things, understand? And yes, the ICJ ruling is only advisory and not legally binding to anyone.

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.

(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

"122. The Court has concluded above that the adoption of the declaration of independence of 17 February 2008 did not violate general international law, Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) or the Constitutional Framework. Consequently the adoption of that declaration did not violate any applicable rule of international law."

If it didn't violate 1244 it should be fine with you since you Serbs are such fans of 1244. 1244 is upheld, Kosovo is independent and your point is?

Comm,

It was well understood that belgrade was asking the highest court of law to chime in on Kosovo's independence, full stop.

Stop back paddling.

What you're saying is the equivalent of, "we asked the court about the legality of the murderer to shoot in public -- not the subsequent murder that followed."

Sincerely,

"If someone say to recognise independence of Kosovo.....".....shoot them that is what Nikolic is trying to say....He also need a long rest.....

Comm,

Why diden't you serbs ask the "right" question then?

The declaration wich made Kosova independent was legal. It clearly means that Kosova independence is legal. You serbs just try to twist it up because you failed with you attemp at the ICJ.

You asked an question and the ICJ answered it. Why diden't you ask if Kosova statehood is legal Then ?

Once again: The ICJ rulung was not about the legality of the independence or statehood of Kosovo, but about the legality of the DECLARATION of independence. Two different things, understand? And yes, the ICJ ruling is only advisory and not legally binding to anyone.

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.
(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

Once again: ICJ ruling was about what SERBIA ASKED FOR, and not Kosovo! Quote: "Is the declaration of independence of Kosovo in line with international law?" And the answer was: "Yes!" If, and this is a very big if, you think that this answer was not enough then you have to address this to those who formulated the question. Kosovo fought against what Serbia was throwing and won unquestionably. Simple as that. Your eternal spinning regarding that is not changing anything..

If you declare 'Arben is independent', this is perfectly legal, too.
(Comm. Parrisson, 21 July 2012 14:20)

it depends on the applicable law

Do not spear in the air, the smell of the old ways in Kosovo!
The distinction is only in the new millennium!

You asked an question and the ICJ answered it. Why diden't you ask if Kosova statehood is legal Then ?
(Demi, 21 July 2012 19:31)

They may pretend stupid as long as they want. In reality they know that ICJ does not have mandate to determine anyone's statehood. If that was the case then any new country's membership would have to go through ICJ's verification.
Also, the UN membership is not necessary for a territory to be a country, because countries have established the UN, not UN the countries.

The constitution of Serbia must be respected in the same way as the other countries respect the constitution of their own country. The Serbian president is right. Vojvodina can not be a state within a state. It can have autonomy and that's all. Decisions of the Constitutional Court must be respected and these decisions should not be commented.