bganon
pre 11 godina
Until you cut in Peggy I was talking about how I find it unacceptable that some people believe that elected Serbian officials should take orders from leaders of other countries. That IS what I am talking about, you have come in and keep adding questions. I thought you cared about sovereignty, obviously not.
You asked me about the Serbian interest, I answered, you spoke about cosying up to Russia / China etc. Now you want to discuss NATO and shaking bloody hands. My problem is that you haven't told me what the alternative to shaking bloody hands is. What does your rhetoric mean? Firstly what is a bloody hand, is any business from a NATO country a bloody hand? How do we sanction a bloody hand? Do we have preferential treatment to non bloody hands? Do we refuse aid from bloody hands them? Flesh out your argument. And what is your definition of a helping hand? Non NATO countries? Countries that have not recognised Kosovo? And how practically do we give them priority? I would appreciate an answer to these questions.
Really I find your last question utterly ridiculous, you are asking me why it was in Serbia's interest to get bombed. When did I ever say it was in Serbia's interest to be bombed. I could ask you when it was in Serbia's interest to have Milosevic as leader, but not only is it a moot question, its also irrelevant and doesn't apply to you. Same reply for Kosovo, I don't support Kosovo being taken away.
69 Komentari
Sortiraj po: