Opposition leader accuses govt. of “stealing EUR 600mn"

Hi Lenard, I have a discovery for you. Check this -> [link]
I think you should start using it. Do they use them in Croatia?
(Zoran, 25 April 2012 18:07) Zoran Serbia stole them what do you advise I use now.

"Serbian Progressive Party (SNS)-led coalition’s presidential candidate Tomislav Nikolic claims the government “has stolen EUR 600mn in the last four years”.

“They paid EUR 2.8mn for videos against Toma and me. Why don’t they make a video about the things they have done so far,” he Ilic stressed.

Because most politicians prefer to critize others instead of saying what they achieved(government)/they want to do(opposition). As we can read in the first sentence, Nicolic shows the same pattern of behaviour.

He added that the EU data showed that the government had stolen EUR 600mn through public procurements. Also is trying to Steal Ex Yugo republics company's man is Serbia digging a big hole for it self http://english.blic.rs/Economy/8032/Croatian-companies-shall-sue-Serbia-if-it-sells-their-property http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/50512/inas-lawsuit-threatens-top-serbian-ranks truly pathetic.

He added that the EU data showed that the government had stolen EUR 600mn through public procurements. Also is trying to Steal Ex Yugo republics company's man is Serbia digging a big hole for it self [link] [link] truly pathetic.
(Lenard, 25 April 2012 17:37)
--
Hi Lenard, I have a discovery for you. Check this -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma
I think you should start using it. Do they use them in Croatia?

Tomislav Nickolic should mention that Tadic and the DS gave the European Union 600 Million Euros because of unnecessarily and unilaterally implementing Free Trade with the European Union before the European Union implemented Free Trade with Serbia.

This is why the Sarajevo Donors could promise, possibly false promise 300 Million Euros to Serbia’ refugees, because they were already paid for their ‘donations’ and they made a very good profit on it, and Tadic can maybe win a few Votes.

"Tomislav Nickolic should mention that Tadic and the DS gave the European Union 600 Million Euros because of unnecessarily and unilaterally implementing Free Trade with the European Union before the European Union implemented Free Trade with Serbia."

Seems like people have no idea what the Free trade agreement is about. it's about import of goods free of import duties. So, when Serbia implemented it, it didn't give anything to the EU! Serbia gets less import taxes, and this might be the 'loss'. But is it really a loss? Less taxes means lower prices for the goods, so the buyers benefit, and no one else (well, maybe the importers, too, but never the EU).

Serbia and the European Union signed the SAA Agreement in April of 2008 to help Tadic and Company win the Election.

Tadic and the DS started implementing the Free Trade part of the Agreement Unilaterally on 1 January 2009, and if this was good for Serbia, then why did Serbia wait for all that time.

It was Holland that wanted Mladic to be surrendered that withheld Free Trade part of the Agreement for one year, and there were no cheaper prices for Serbians, because the Dutch would definitely not have liked that under the circumstances of those times, because they were imposing sanctions on Serbia.

It no secret that massive amounts of money are stolen through public procurements, and whats even worse, most of that money comes from EU fonds which mean we will have to pay it back... If you look at lets say Belgrade today, there is maybe 4 or 5 constructions. Nothing is working. Makes a man wonder where did all that money go...

“I owe it to you to live better,” Nikolić told the citizens

Let's just hope this is a bad translation and not a true reflection of Nikolic's sentiments.

He added that the EU data showed that the government had stolen EUR 600mn through public procurements. Also is trying to Steal Ex Yugo republics company's man is Serbia digging a big hole for it self http://english.blic.rs/Economy/8032/Croatian-companies-shall-sue-Serbia-if-it-sells-their-property http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/50512/inas-lawsuit-threatens-top-serbian-ranks truly pathetic.

Hi Lenard, I have a discovery for you. Check this -> [link]
I think you should start using it. Do they use them in Croatia?
(Zoran, 25 April 2012 18:07) Zoran Serbia stole them what do you advise I use now.

"Serbian Progressive Party (SNS)-led coalition’s presidential candidate Tomislav Nikolic claims the government “has stolen EUR 600mn in the last four years”.

“They paid EUR 2.8mn for videos against Toma and me. Why don’t they make a video about the things they have done so far,” he Ilic stressed.

Because most politicians prefer to critize others instead of saying what they achieved(government)/they want to do(opposition). As we can read in the first sentence, Nicolic shows the same pattern of behaviour.

He added that the EU data showed that the government had stolen EUR 600mn through public procurements. Also is trying to Steal Ex Yugo republics company's man is Serbia digging a big hole for it self [link] [link] truly pathetic.
(Lenard, 25 April 2012 17:37)
--
Hi Lenard, I have a discovery for you. Check this -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma
I think you should start using it. Do they use them in Croatia?

“I owe it to you to live better,” Nikolić told the citizens

Let's just hope this is a bad translation and not a true reflection of Nikolic's sentiments.

Tomislav Nickolic should mention that Tadic and the DS gave the European Union 600 Million Euros because of unnecessarily and unilaterally implementing Free Trade with the European Union before the European Union implemented Free Trade with Serbia.

This is why the Sarajevo Donors could promise, possibly false promise 300 Million Euros to Serbia’ refugees, because they were already paid for their ‘donations’ and they made a very good profit on it, and Tadic can maybe win a few Votes.

"Tomislav Nickolic should mention that Tadic and the DS gave the European Union 600 Million Euros because of unnecessarily and unilaterally implementing Free Trade with the European Union before the European Union implemented Free Trade with Serbia."

Seems like people have no idea what the Free trade agreement is about. it's about import of goods free of import duties. So, when Serbia implemented it, it didn't give anything to the EU! Serbia gets less import taxes, and this might be the 'loss'. But is it really a loss? Less taxes means lower prices for the goods, so the buyers benefit, and no one else (well, maybe the importers, too, but never the EU).

Serbia and the European Union signed the SAA Agreement in April of 2008 to help Tadic and Company win the Election.

Tadic and the DS started implementing the Free Trade part of the Agreement Unilaterally on 1 January 2009, and if this was good for Serbia, then why did Serbia wait for all that time.

It was Holland that wanted Mladic to be surrendered that withheld Free Trade part of the Agreement for one year, and there were no cheaper prices for Serbians, because the Dutch would definitely not have liked that under the circumstances of those times, because they were imposing sanctions on Serbia.

It no secret that massive amounts of money are stolen through public procurements, and whats even worse, most of that money comes from EU fonds which mean we will have to pay it back... If you look at lets say Belgrade today, there is maybe 4 or 5 constructions. Nothing is working. Makes a man wonder where did all that money go...