Šešelj's wife enters presidential race

Will she be kidnapped and extradited to the NATO show tribunal before or after the election?

Anyway let me digress, Serbia is f*cked. By the western imposed quisling regime and 1.800 western funded NGOs firmly entrenched in our society (and minds), no less.

If Serbs really wants freedom, and are able to see through the thick mind raping propaganda fog, it should follow Egypt´s suit and crack and arrest these trojan horses. From top to bottom. True, Serbia will never be the same again but if the quisling get their way there will be no Serbia to talk about either. We are a successful neo-liberal NATO experiment, "regime changed" guinea pigs, a role model for every r2p onslaught imperial genocide since. Serbia is where it started and here it´s where it will be defeated.

I wouldn't bother with that troll Danilo, really. I doubt 10 people have read this news and yet wtf still continues with his multiple voting trick.
======================================
What makes you think that 25 ticks means multiple voting?
Many people will tick this or that but might not comment themselves. Now it the number was really high like in 2 digits like it is at times then you may have a point.
Bganon, I am surprised you would support Danilo in any statement. Maybe I won't be in the future.

@Danilo & bganon

Yeah, right, because Serbia's 'democracy' is just so fair and honest! God you two are either extremely naive or extremely stupid. I am not suggesting that the Radicals would truthfully outright win an election at all, but come on, if you are suggesting that these so called elections are a fair race, then please don't waste people's time, it is just plainly false.

Doesn't Seslj has a son? In Kingdoms, its usual that the offspring takes over the office ;)
(Comm. Parrisson, 7 April 2012 09:01)
===========================
Silly remark. It's all happened before. What kingdom?
Anyway, it was the party who wanted her and she is the next best thing.
This is a very smart move by the party.

Yes Bganon i have been abroad for a while,(try it yourself, might give you and team Otpor™/CANVAS™ other perspectives, heck. It might evenbring you out of that "forever 90´s" rock your under, but i digress..) but your usual hysterical rantings and spews goes on as usual, i see, since his forum was created by and for you and your ilks in the first place.

Now, as before, since you´r still so obsessed with not only me but your daily dose of B92 ratings. How about some proof to your accusations? Sure you can ask your friends among the staff. You never did contact me to sort this tiresome obsession of yours out, did you?

Of course not you need someone like me just in case things dont go they way you intended, how very Otpor™ of you. Still, im here if you do dare to come clean...

I wouldn't bother with that troll Danilo, really. I doubt 10 people have read this news and yet wtf still continues with his multiple voting trick.

He is one sad individual that is probably best left ignored. I'll be thinking of his anguish when his political option is trounced at the ballot box though...

That's very nice of you, wtf, to suggest that Serbs, other than yourself of course, start an armed rebellion against their democratically elected government.

Why don't you come here and take up arms yourself?

This isn't rooting for your favourite sports team, you know.

What a honorable and democratic party where the leader can make all decisions and nominate his wife for presidential candidacy. Amazing.

Doesn't Seslj has a son? In Kingdoms, its usual that the offspring takes over the office ;)

Come on Peggy, sometimes talking with you is like going round in circles, you not only forget what I've said in the past, but what you yourself have said.

I distinctly remember you pooh poohing the idea that this character was up to these tricks saying I just wasn't happy with the numbers, only months later for you to bitterly complain about somebody trolling the figures yourself. Did I whine on about how you were just upset about the numbers? No, I believed you. You ask how do I know - well if its the same character always having high numbers within say an hour of posting and he is the only one to have posted, then it doesn't take a great amount of intelligence to fill in the gaps.
He has a long, long record of doing this and creating other characters. Happily we have been spared his polluting presence from this forum for some months. He will probably finally lose interest now that he realises that his views are not shared by most, no matter how many votes he awards himself

If Danilo says something sensible Peggy I will support it. Do you think principles or the person saying something are more important?

SCPUK I don't know what you are droning on about. I didn't say anything about Serbian democracy. But yeah I know you have far right political views and see the world through that prism.

Anyway, it was the party who wanted her and she is the next best thing.
This is a very smart move by the party.
(Peggy, 7 April 2012 12:54)

As we can read in the article:

"After the announcement that the presidential elections will be held on May 6, the SRS said that their candidate would be Martinovic but Šešelj changed the decision in the meantime."

Hmm, bearing in mind Seselj's attitude 'the party is me', it's exactly like you wrote: The party wanted her. LOL

wtf that was a witty post, was there a point? It must be galling for you to come on here to use this forum when it was created by the very people who you hate so much. Very principled of you by the way. It must be infuriating to know that they afford you rights that you yourself would never allow were you in charge.

Care to provide some proof to your contention that you don't boost your ratings? Certainly circumstantial evidence supports my claim, more than it does yours, I know its a pathological problem for you to stop. I suppose you might claim that for some reason only your posts and the posts of your ghost monickers are popular among B92 posters, that even posts with identical viewpoints to yours are ignored by B92 posters, because your personal opinion is most popular!

But how is it from your own admission for example that I can recognise that you had not been on this forum? First I recognise your language, second I recognise your multiple monickers, third I know the topics that you are interested (obsessed with more like) in and whether ratings have been boosted in that thread. I don't have to be a detective to know this. Of course you don't believe yourself to be so easy to identify, or that anybody could be intelligent enough to notice, so you have concluded that either I work at B92, or know / have access to IT stats / IP addresses which is the reason you believe that I know you troll this site.

By the way were it up to me your IP would have been banned because of your sock puppet tendencies and rating boosting activities. And don't kid yourself its because of your views. I respect anybody who honourably advocates a viewpoint, what is disgusting are underhand and pitiful tactics of pretending to be popular and creation of multiple identities. In forums where one must log in these trolls are banned.

But please do tell everybody here how would it be possible to sort out the fact that you feel the need to troll this site. How would talking to me make a difference? Its simple, stop trolling and behave like the large majority of other posters. You are not special.

Anyway as I say, your political option will again lose at the coming election. Keep sucking on those lemons, at least for another 5 years!

Peggy, are you serious? Smart move by the Party? If the party wants to be serious, let them redraw the candidacy...That would be serious decision...First announced candidate was Mr.Martinovic then they changed their mind and announce the second candidate Ms. Seselj. And you think that was a smart move? Do you really think think that Ms. Seselj will won enough votes to enter the second round...c'Mon, be serious. Everybody knowt this move was enforced by Seselj himself just to take some of SNS votes and to sabotage Mr. Nikolic's first roung victory.

8

Bganon, when I said something about the numbers, the numbers were in the hundreds. Maybe remembering that doesn't help your comment but the numbers were around three hundred or so.
The number here was only 25, huge difference. It is possible that people have read it, commented and moved on. If I saw a number in three digits like I complained about previously then I would admit there was something to discuss.

Every comment Danilo has ever made was anti Serb so no I don't see how I could ever agree with him. I know that he would never make a comment which was not intended in his usual way.

Bganon, let's keep things in perspective here and compare apples with apples. Positive or negative ticks in hundreds are suspicious but not double digits.
You and I agree and disagree on regular basis so there is nothing personal here, as you know, but please don't compare when I complain about hundreds to disagreeing with you on tens.

Hmm, bearing in mind Seselj's attitude 'the party is me', it's exactly like you wrote: The party wanted her. LOL
(Comm. Parrisson, 7 April 2012 14:08)
=====================================
Yes they did and if you think this was stupid then you are free not to vote that way.
I can't see how you have a problem with who the party puts forward. It is their decision. I was merely stating an opinion and not an endorsement. I don't have the right to vote in Serbia but neither do many people and definitely many foreign government and they all have an opinion which sometimes they enforce with weapons.
How many times has this sort of thing happened around the world and you still have a problem with it? This is nothing new.

So if you are registered to vote in Serbia show your disapproval at the ballot but I think what the Radicals did here will help them.

"Care to provide some proof to your contention that you don't boost your ratings?"
---------------------------

Bganon, when you accuse someone of something then it is you who has the responsibility to provide proof.
You can say that you suspect but unless you can prove to us you cannot say that he/she does.
I don't know this person nor do I care what his/her opinion is. We all have our own individual ones but you are going after this person as if you had a personal vendetta. Show us proof of what you claim not just suspicion or ask B92 to provide proof. Again, I don't think that 25 positive ticks proves anything.

Peggy,

I'm not anti-Serb. I'm consistently anti-stupidity.
Hope this helps.

Peggy just forget about it, you just don't get it - I'm not going to waste any more time on voting numbers. The fact that only one person posts on a uninteresting subject and has say 40 votes seems normal to you for example. Thats ok, he and I both know that what I'm saying is true, you don't, end of story.

If you want to see an example of wtf's multiple identities though, even you might be able to recognise that at least once I was talking to the same person even though the troll was claiming to be different people (please also note the timing of the last 2 postings):

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/comments.php?nav_id=70437

I do disagree with the idea of disagreeing with the person, rather than what they are saying. Even the most deluded character such as wtf/Go East etc gets it right every once in a while. If I can agree with a troll, surely you can find it in your heart to consider a non troll's opinion, even if you disagree with almost everything he writes?

Peggy just forget about it, you just don't get it - I'm not going to waste any more time on voting numbers. The fact that only one person posts on a uninteresting subject and has say 40 votes seems normal to you for example
=============================

Bganon, it was ONLY 25 at the time and not forty. That number of 25 is not too high. I don't understand why you are now changing it to 40. Sure it is 39 at present but at the time it wasn't.
No, it doesn't seem odd to me that a person would get that many ticks for a comment.
I am not obsessed with numbers but only with facts and the fact are not as you state and actually you have just tried to change them.
Again, the onus is on the accuser to prove not the other way around but you don't want to do that. You want to drop it now.
Fine, no problem I will drop it, just know that you were not convincing at all.

That's very nice of you, wtf, to suggest that Serbs, other than yourself of course, start an armed rebellion against their democratically elected government.

Why don't you come here and take up arms yourself?

This isn't rooting for your favourite sports team, you know.

I wouldn't bother with that troll Danilo, really. I doubt 10 people have read this news and yet wtf still continues with his multiple voting trick.

He is one sad individual that is probably best left ignored. I'll be thinking of his anguish when his political option is trounced at the ballot box though...

Come on Peggy, sometimes talking with you is like going round in circles, you not only forget what I've said in the past, but what you yourself have said.

I distinctly remember you pooh poohing the idea that this character was up to these tricks saying I just wasn't happy with the numbers, only months later for you to bitterly complain about somebody trolling the figures yourself. Did I whine on about how you were just upset about the numbers? No, I believed you. You ask how do I know - well if its the same character always having high numbers within say an hour of posting and he is the only one to have posted, then it doesn't take a great amount of intelligence to fill in the gaps.
He has a long, long record of doing this and creating other characters. Happily we have been spared his polluting presence from this forum for some months. He will probably finally lose interest now that he realises that his views are not shared by most, no matter how many votes he awards himself

If Danilo says something sensible Peggy I will support it. Do you think principles or the person saying something are more important?

SCPUK I don't know what you are droning on about. I didn't say anything about Serbian democracy. But yeah I know you have far right political views and see the world through that prism.

Will she be kidnapped and extradited to the NATO show tribunal before or after the election?

Anyway let me digress, Serbia is f*cked. By the western imposed quisling regime and 1.800 western funded NGOs firmly entrenched in our society (and minds), no less.

If Serbs really wants freedom, and are able to see through the thick mind raping propaganda fog, it should follow Egypt´s suit and crack and arrest these trojan horses. From top to bottom. True, Serbia will never be the same again but if the quisling get their way there will be no Serbia to talk about either. We are a successful neo-liberal NATO experiment, "regime changed" guinea pigs, a role model for every r2p onslaught imperial genocide since. Serbia is where it started and here it´s where it will be defeated.

Anyway, it was the party who wanted her and she is the next best thing.
This is a very smart move by the party.
(Peggy, 7 April 2012 12:54)

As we can read in the article:

"After the announcement that the presidential elections will be held on May 6, the SRS said that their candidate would be Martinovic but Šešelj changed the decision in the meantime."

Hmm, bearing in mind Seselj's attitude 'the party is me', it's exactly like you wrote: The party wanted her. LOL

Peggy, are you serious? Smart move by the Party? If the party wants to be serious, let them redraw the candidacy...That would be serious decision...First announced candidate was Mr.Martinovic then they changed their mind and announce the second candidate Ms. Seselj. And you think that was a smart move? Do you really think think that Ms. Seselj will won enough votes to enter the second round...c'Mon, be serious. Everybody knowt this move was enforced by Seselj himself just to take some of SNS votes and to sabotage Mr. Nikolic's first roung victory.

8

What a honorable and democratic party where the leader can make all decisions and nominate his wife for presidential candidacy. Amazing.

Doesn't Seslj has a son? In Kingdoms, its usual that the offspring takes over the office ;)

Yes Bganon i have been abroad for a while,(try it yourself, might give you and team Otpor™/CANVAS™ other perspectives, heck. It might evenbring you out of that "forever 90´s" rock your under, but i digress..) but your usual hysterical rantings and spews goes on as usual, i see, since his forum was created by and for you and your ilks in the first place.

Now, as before, since you´r still so obsessed with not only me but your daily dose of B92 ratings. How about some proof to your accusations? Sure you can ask your friends among the staff. You never did contact me to sort this tiresome obsession of yours out, did you?

Of course not you need someone like me just in case things dont go they way you intended, how very Otpor™ of you. Still, im here if you do dare to come clean...

wtf that was a witty post, was there a point? It must be galling for you to come on here to use this forum when it was created by the very people who you hate so much. Very principled of you by the way. It must be infuriating to know that they afford you rights that you yourself would never allow were you in charge.

Care to provide some proof to your contention that you don't boost your ratings? Certainly circumstantial evidence supports my claim, more than it does yours, I know its a pathological problem for you to stop. I suppose you might claim that for some reason only your posts and the posts of your ghost monickers are popular among B92 posters, that even posts with identical viewpoints to yours are ignored by B92 posters, because your personal opinion is most popular!

But how is it from your own admission for example that I can recognise that you had not been on this forum? First I recognise your language, second I recognise your multiple monickers, third I know the topics that you are interested (obsessed with more like) in and whether ratings have been boosted in that thread. I don't have to be a detective to know this. Of course you don't believe yourself to be so easy to identify, or that anybody could be intelligent enough to notice, so you have concluded that either I work at B92, or know / have access to IT stats / IP addresses which is the reason you believe that I know you troll this site.

By the way were it up to me your IP would have been banned because of your sock puppet tendencies and rating boosting activities. And don't kid yourself its because of your views. I respect anybody who honourably advocates a viewpoint, what is disgusting are underhand and pitiful tactics of pretending to be popular and creation of multiple identities. In forums where one must log in these trolls are banned.

But please do tell everybody here how would it be possible to sort out the fact that you feel the need to troll this site. How would talking to me make a difference? Its simple, stop trolling and behave like the large majority of other posters. You are not special.

Anyway as I say, your political option will again lose at the coming election. Keep sucking on those lemons, at least for another 5 years!

Doesn't Seslj has a son? In Kingdoms, its usual that the offspring takes over the office ;)
(Comm. Parrisson, 7 April 2012 09:01)
===========================
Silly remark. It's all happened before. What kingdom?
Anyway, it was the party who wanted her and she is the next best thing.
This is a very smart move by the party.

Peggy,

I'm not anti-Serb. I'm consistently anti-stupidity.
Hope this helps.

I wouldn't bother with that troll Danilo, really. I doubt 10 people have read this news and yet wtf still continues with his multiple voting trick.
======================================
What makes you think that 25 ticks means multiple voting?
Many people will tick this or that but might not comment themselves. Now it the number was really high like in 2 digits like it is at times then you may have a point.
Bganon, I am surprised you would support Danilo in any statement. Maybe I won't be in the future.

@Danilo & bganon

Yeah, right, because Serbia's 'democracy' is just so fair and honest! God you two are either extremely naive or extremely stupid. I am not suggesting that the Radicals would truthfully outright win an election at all, but come on, if you are suggesting that these so called elections are a fair race, then please don't waste people's time, it is just plainly false.

Hmm, bearing in mind Seselj's attitude 'the party is me', it's exactly like you wrote: The party wanted her. LOL
(Comm. Parrisson, 7 April 2012 14:08)
=====================================
Yes they did and if you think this was stupid then you are free not to vote that way.
I can't see how you have a problem with who the party puts forward. It is their decision. I was merely stating an opinion and not an endorsement. I don't have the right to vote in Serbia but neither do many people and definitely many foreign government and they all have an opinion which sometimes they enforce with weapons.
How many times has this sort of thing happened around the world and you still have a problem with it? This is nothing new.

So if you are registered to vote in Serbia show your disapproval at the ballot but I think what the Radicals did here will help them.

Peggy just forget about it, you just don't get it - I'm not going to waste any more time on voting numbers. The fact that only one person posts on a uninteresting subject and has say 40 votes seems normal to you for example. Thats ok, he and I both know that what I'm saying is true, you don't, end of story.

If you want to see an example of wtf's multiple identities though, even you might be able to recognise that at least once I was talking to the same person even though the troll was claiming to be different people (please also note the timing of the last 2 postings):

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/comments.php?nav_id=70437

I do disagree with the idea of disagreeing with the person, rather than what they are saying. Even the most deluded character such as wtf/Go East etc gets it right every once in a while. If I can agree with a troll, surely you can find it in your heart to consider a non troll's opinion, even if you disagree with almost everything he writes?

Bganon, when I said something about the numbers, the numbers were in the hundreds. Maybe remembering that doesn't help your comment but the numbers were around three hundred or so.
The number here was only 25, huge difference. It is possible that people have read it, commented and moved on. If I saw a number in three digits like I complained about previously then I would admit there was something to discuss.

Every comment Danilo has ever made was anti Serb so no I don't see how I could ever agree with him. I know that he would never make a comment which was not intended in his usual way.

Bganon, let's keep things in perspective here and compare apples with apples. Positive or negative ticks in hundreds are suspicious but not double digits.
You and I agree and disagree on regular basis so there is nothing personal here, as you know, but please don't compare when I complain about hundreds to disagreeing with you on tens.

"Care to provide some proof to your contention that you don't boost your ratings?"
---------------------------

Bganon, when you accuse someone of something then it is you who has the responsibility to provide proof.
You can say that you suspect but unless you can prove to us you cannot say that he/she does.
I don't know this person nor do I care what his/her opinion is. We all have our own individual ones but you are going after this person as if you had a personal vendetta. Show us proof of what you claim not just suspicion or ask B92 to provide proof. Again, I don't think that 25 positive ticks proves anything.

Peggy just forget about it, you just don't get it - I'm not going to waste any more time on voting numbers. The fact that only one person posts on a uninteresting subject and has say 40 votes seems normal to you for example
=============================

Bganon, it was ONLY 25 at the time and not forty. That number of 25 is not too high. I don't understand why you are now changing it to 40. Sure it is 39 at present but at the time it wasn't.
No, it doesn't seem odd to me that a person would get that many ticks for a comment.
I am not obsessed with numbers but only with facts and the fact are not as you state and actually you have just tried to change them.
Again, the onus is on the accuser to prove not the other way around but you don't want to do that. You want to drop it now.
Fine, no problem I will drop it, just know that you were not convincing at all.