lowe
pre 12 godina
“Haven’t you heard about their Kosovo Serbs colleagues hurling pipe bombs at KFOR soldiers ?!”
Well, your fave Merriam Webster defined a colleague as “an associate in a profession or in a civil or ecclesiastical office.” And the synonyms listed include “associate” and “coworker”. How are these K-Serbs considered colleagues of their attackers by definition?
“I did not mention anywhere extraction of human organs. Where did you see that ?!”
Well, I asked whether their body organs were still intact. And you replied ““Exactly because the attackers did not follow the example of their colleagues a few months ago to use more peaceful means like Molotov cocktails, pipe bombs and the like.” So you were basically saying that the organs in this case were not extracted, right? And your reason was that the attackers did not follow their colleagues (whose identities still remained dubious to me so I am looking forward to your clarification as requested). So I thought you meant that since the attackers left the organs intact this time by NOT following their colleagues, then these colleagues must have removed the body organs, right? And furthermore removing the organs using more peaceful means via Molotov cocktails and pipe bombs, right? Which was why I was just so eager to learn more about this fantastic technique of organs removal.
“That’s what we were told in these forums that they were just peaceful protesters…
(icj1, 7 April 2012 23:06)”
I wasn’t asking about peaceful protesting. I was asking about how these protesters are colleagues of the attackers in the current article, and about their method of peaceful removal of body organs using Molotov cocktails, pipe bombs and the like. Can you please provide, as I requested in my previous post, credible evidence to substantiate your claims?
45 Komentari
Sortiraj po: